Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12624000622505
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
26/04/2024
Date registered
14/05/2024
Date last updated
14/07/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
14/05/2024
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The influence of a knee osteoarthritis diagnosis on people’s beliefs about the condition
Query!
Scientific title
Effects of a radiographic diagnosis and explanation of knee osteoarthritis on consumer beliefs about knee pain management: an online randomised controlled trial in adults aged 45 and over who have and have not experienced activity-related knee joint pain
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
311543
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Knee Osteoarthritis
332897
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
329615
329615
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The entire trial will be administered in one single online survey.
Eligible participants will be asked to imagine a hypothetical scenario where they have made an appointment with a General Practitioner (GP) to find out what is wrong with their painful knee. Participants will then be automatically randomised into one of three groups, all of which will be asked to watch a pre-recorded video on their screen where they receive a hypothetical knee osteoarthritis (OA) diagnosis from their GP.
The three groups will be:
i) Clinical diagnosis and explanation without being sent for x-ray: the video will show the GP providing a clinical diagnosis of knee OA based on their age and symptoms, including an explanation of why x-rays are not necessary for OA diagnosis. The GP will then explain what OA is. This will include the how it is diagnosed, basic pathogenesis, natural history and treatment options.
ii) Diagnosis and explanation based on x-ray findings (but without showing the x-ray images): the video will show the GP ordering an x-ray for the participant, summarising the x-ray report (but not showing the participant the x-ray images), and providing a diagnosis of knee OA. The GP will then explain what OA is. This will include the how it is diagnosed, basic pathogenesis, natural history and treatment options.
iii) Diagnosis and explanation based on x-ray (and showing the x-ray images): the video will show the GP ordering an x-ray for the participant, then summarising the x-ray report and Showing them the x-ray images, and providing a diagnosis of knee OA. The GP will then explain what OA is. This will include the how it is diagnosed, basic pathogenesis, natural history and treatment options.
The video for all groups will be scripted in a way that intends to reflect what typical language and communication style may look like in a real-world general practice setting. The video in each group is anticipated to last for 2-3 minutes.
With regards to fidelity, we will collect data on whether watched allocated video or not
time spent watching video.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
327999
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
This is a three arm study, with the three groups described above. The reference comparator will be group 3, which will receive a diagnosis based on xray and will be shown the images.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
337404
0
Belief about joint replacement surgery
Query!
Assessment method [1]
337404
0
11-point NRS ranging from 0=definitely unnecessary to 10=definitely necessary
Query!
Timepoint [1]
337404
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
338165
0
Belief about exercise and physical activity.
Note: this is being is being asked as a single question. It is not a composite measure.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
338165
0
This will be assessed as a 11-point NRS ranging from 0=definitely not helpful to 10=definitely helpful
Note: this is being is being asked as a single question. It is not a composite measure.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
338165
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
433084
0
Belief about safety of exercise
Query!
Assessment method [1]
433084
0
11-point NRS ranging from 0=definitely would not damage it to 10=definitely would damage it
Query!
Timepoint [1]
433084
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
433085
0
Belief about medication
Query!
Assessment method [2]
433085
0
11-point NRS ranging from 0=definitely not helpful to 10=definitely helpful
Query!
Timepoint [2]
433085
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
433086
0
Level of concern
Query!
Assessment method [3]
433086
0
11-point NRS ranging from 0=not at all concerned to 10=extremely concerned
Query!
Timepoint [3]
433086
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
433087
0
Fear of movement
Query!
Assessment method [4]
433087
0
Brief Fear of Movement Scale {Shelby, 2012}. A 4-point scale ranging “strongly disagree” (1), “disagree” (2), “agree” (3), and “strongly agree” .
Query!
Timepoint [4]
433087
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
433088
0
Belief about orthopaedic surgeon
Query!
Assessment method [5]
433088
0
11-point NRS ranging from 0=definitely could not help to 10=definitely could help
Query!
Timepoint [5]
433088
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
433089
0
Belief about rheumatologist
Query!
Assessment method [6]
433089
0
11-point NRS ranging from 0=definitely could not help to 10=definitely could help
Query!
Timepoint [6]
433089
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
433090
0
Belief about physiotherapist
Query!
Assessment method [7]
433090
0
11-point NRS ranging from 0=definitely could not help to 10=definitely could help
Query!
Timepoint [7]
433090
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
433091
0
Overall satisfaction
Query!
Assessment method [8]
433091
0
11-point NRS ranging from 0=definitely not satisfied to 10=definitely satisfied
Query!
Timepoint [8]
433091
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
433092
0
Satisfaction with information
Query!
Assessment method [9]
433092
0
11-point NRS ranging from 0=definitely not satisfied to 10=definitely satisfied
Query!
Timepoint [9]
433092
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
433093
0
Confidence
Query!
Assessment method [10]
433093
0
11-point NRS ranging from 0=not at all confident to 10=very confident
Query!
Timepoint [10]
433093
0
Single survey study - will be assessed immediately after watching the hypothetical knee consultation video
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Participants will be eligible for the study if they meet the following inclusion criteria:
i) Adults aged 45 years or over;
ii) Currently living in Australia;
iii) Either have, and have not, experienced activity-related knee joint pain in the last 3 months; and
iv) Have never consulted a healthcare professional for chronic knee pain.
Note: We will recruit a sample of 50% who have knee pain, and 50% who do not have knee pain.
Query!
Minimum age
45
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Inability to understand or read English
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
After completing baseline measures, participants will be automatically randomised to one of the three groups by the Qualtrics software (using the “randomiser” feature set to evenly present elements at a 1:1:1 ratio).
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
This will be done by the Qualtrics software, using the “randomiser” feature set to evenly present elements at a 1:1:1 ratio. The order of group allocation is performed automatically by Qualtrics and is not known to researchers.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
We will use complete case analyses. A Statistical Analysis Plan will be written prior to data analysis commencing and published on our Centre’s website. Briefly, for primary outcomes and other secondary outcomes, mean differences in post-intervention scores between groups will be estimated via linear mixed-effects models.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
20/05/2024
Query!
Actual
16/05/2024
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/05/2024
Query!
Actual
25/05/2024
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/05/2024
Query!
Actual
25/05/2024
Query!
Sample size
Target
609
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
618
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
315840
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
315840
0
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Grant (#2025733)
Query!
Address [1]
315840
0
Query!
Country [1]
315840
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Melbourne
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
317967
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
317967
0
Query!
Address [1]
317967
0
Query!
Country [1]
317967
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
314695
0
University of Melbourne Central Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
314695
0
https://research.unimelb.edu.au/work-with-us/ethics-and-integrity/our-ethics-committees
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
314695
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
314695
0
08/04/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
314695
0
09/05/2024
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
314695
0
2024-29162-53195-3
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Unfortunately, many people will experience knee osteoarthritis at some point in their life. This can be diagnosed by a General Practitioner (GP) or other health professional, and there are different ways this may be done. People often have beliefs about treatments for, and the prognosis of, their knee osteoarthritis. Currently, we do not know whether the way someone is diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis makes any difference to their beliefs about treatment or prognosis. This study is interested in learning more about whether the way people are diagnosed with knee osteoarthrtitis changes their beliefs about the condition. We hypothesise that a diagnosis and explanation without x-ray will reduce beliefs that surgery is necessary and increase beliefs that exercise is helpful, compared to a diagnosis and explanation based on x-ray.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
132422
0
Dr Belinda Lawford
Query!
Address
132422
0
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine Department of Physiotherapy School of Health Sciences, Alan Gilbert Building 161 Barry Street Carlton Victoria 3053
Query!
Country
132422
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
132422
0
+61 03 8344 2045
Query!
Fax
132422
0
Query!
Email
132422
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
132423
0
Belinda Lawford
Query!
Address
132423
0
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine Department of Physiotherapy School of Health Sciences University of Melbourne Alan Gilbert Building 161 Barry Street Carlton Victoria 3053
Query!
Country
132423
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
132423
0
+61 03 83442045
Query!
Fax
132423
0
Query!
Email
132423
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
132424
0
Belinda Lawford
Query!
Address
132424
0
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine Department of Physiotherapy School of Health Sciences University of Melbourne Alan Gilbert Building 161 Barry Street Carlton Victoria 3053
Query!
Country
132424
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
132424
0
+61 03 83442045
Query!
Fax
132424
0
Query!
Email
132424
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Data relating to primary and secondary outcomes.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Immediately following publication, for a period of 15 years.
Query!
Available to whom?
Data will be made available as required for specific, approved analyses by researchers. Data will be provided from locked, cleaned, and de- identified study database. Requests will be reviewed by the Principal Investigator prior to approval.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
The investigators endorse the concept of data sharing to advance medical science. All requests for data sharing will be reviewed by the Principal Investigator to ensure no conflict with any planned sub analyses and to ensure that the data are shared in an ethical and protected manner. Analyses aimed to improve treatment of knee osteoarthritis for non-commercial purposes are eligible.
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
By emailing the Principal Investigator at
[email protected]
. Data will be made available after review and approval by the Principal Investigator. Before any analysis, a signed Confidentiality Agreement and/or Data Sharing Agreement is required.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF