Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12624000496516p
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Date submitted
16/02/2024
Date registered
23/04/2024
Date last updated
23/04/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
23/04/2024
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Transabdominal and Transperineal Ultrasound in Proctitis Assessment
Query!
Scientific title
The accuracy and reliability of transabdominal and trans-perineal ultrasound in the assessment of the proctitis and impact of subcutaneous adipose tissue and bladder fullness
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
311557
0
Nil Known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
TRUST-PA - TRansabdominal and tranSperineal Ultrasound in proctiTis Assessment
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Proctitis
332920
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Oral and Gastrointestinal
329633
329633
0
0
Query!
Inflammatory bowel disease
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of transabdominal and trans-perineal ultrasound in assessing the rectum, using colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy as the reference standard, and to explore the impact of subcutaneous adipose tissue(SAT) and bladder fullness on image quality and accuracy.
Design: Cross-sectional study
Recruitment:
Participants: Adults with known or suspected IBD involving the rectum undergoing colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy for any clinical indication and intestinal ultrasound (IUS) within 30 days.
Methods:
Undergo colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy, with endoscopists blinded to ultrasound findings.
Ultrasound:
Preparation – 2 hours not emptying ones bladder
First part - Transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) - 10 minutes
Standard of care intestinal ultrasound, including assessing the rectum transabdominally in both the transverse and sagittal views.
Assessment of bladder fullness
Measurement of Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT):
a. Above the Umbilicus (for comparison):
Identify a point 1 cm above the umbilicus in the midline.
Using a high-frequency linear probe, obtain an image initially on transverse view and later in the longitudinal (or sagittal) axis.
Freeze the photo at the end of the expiration.
Measure the distance from the inner surface of the skin to the outer surface of the linea alba.
This distance represents the thickness of the SAT in the upper abdomen.
SAT will appear as a hypoechoic (darker) layer between the hyperechoic (brighter) skin and the hyperechoic linea alba
Take 2 sagittal and 2 transverse multiple and average them for added accuracy.
b. Suprapubic Area:
Applying a similar strategy but now placing the probe perpendicular to the skin in the midline, approximately 5-10 cm below the umbilicus.
Measure the thickness of the SAT from the inner surface of the skin to the outer surface of the linea alba.
Take 2 sagittal and 2 transverse multiple and average them for added accuracy.
Second part Transperineal ultrasound(TPUS) - 5 minutes
Use the micro-convex prob. Measure first in coronal and later in sagittal.
Consider having two sonographers measure the SAT and VAT independently in a subset of patients to determine inter-rater reliability
Both will be done on the same day, starting with transabdominal approach followed by the transperineal approach.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
328007
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Standard of care flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy done within 30 days of the ultrasound.
All standard of care procedures are done by gastroenterologists using Olympus colonoscopes and include biopsies of all examined colonic segments.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
337417
0
Accuracy of bowel wall thickness measured via transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound in assessing the rectum for inflammation compared to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
337417
0
Using colonoscopy features (mayoendoscopy score and UCEIS score), the overall accuracy of the bowel wall thickness measured via TAUS and TPUS will be assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Their accuracy at assessing severity of colitis will be assessed by correlating bowel wall thickness as a continuous variable with colonoscopy scores of the Mayo endoscopic score and UCEIS scores, using the Spearman’s rank order correlation.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
337417
0
Ultrasound and colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy done within 30 days
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
337635
0
Accuracy of colour Doppler measured via transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound in assessing the rectum for inflammation compared to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
337635
0
Using colonoscopy features (mayoendoscopy score and UCEIS score), the overall accuracy of the colour Doppler signal measured via TAUS and TPUS will be assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Their accuracy at assessing severity of colitis will be assessed by correlating Colour doppler signal as an ordinal variable with colonoscopy scores of the Mayo endoscopic score and UCEIS scores, using the Spearman’s rank order correlation.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
337635
0
Ultrasound and colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy done within 30 days
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
337636
0
The accuracy of a composite of bowel wall thickness and colour doppler signal via transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound in assessing the rectum for inflammation compared to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
337636
0
Using colonoscopy features (mayoendoscopy score and UCEIS score), the overall accuracy of a composite of bowel wall thickness and colour Doppler signal measured via TAUS and TPUS will be assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Their accuracy at assessing severity of colitis will be assessed by correlating composite score that includes bowel wall thickness Colour doppler signal with colonoscopy scores of the Mayo endoscopic score and UCEIS scores, using the Spearman’s rank order correlation.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
337636
0
Ultrasound and colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy done within 30 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
431796
0
Quality of ultrasound views
Query!
Assessment method [1]
431796
0
Quality will be categorically described as good, partial and poor as previously published in the article "Accuracy of Gastrointestinal Ultrasound
and Calprotectin in the Assessment of Inflammation and its Location in Patients with an Ileoanal Pouch. Briefly, Good is when both mucosa and lumen interface, and the serosa and muscular interface are seen clearly. Partial is when only one of these two interfaces is seen clearly, and poor when neither interface is seen clearly.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
431796
0
On the same day of ultrasound
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
431797
0
SAT thickness
Query!
Assessment method [2]
431797
0
Transabdominal assessment of SAT at two points, one above the umbilicus and a second in the suprapubic area.
First measurement is above the Umbilicus
-Identify a point 1 cm above the umbilicus in the midline.
-Using a high-frequency linear probe, obtain an image initially on transverse view and later in the longitudinal (or sagittal) axis.
-Freeze the photo at the end of the expiration.
-Measure the distance from the inner surface of the skin to the outer surface of the linea alba.
This distance represents the thickness of the SAT in the upper abdomen.
-Take 2 sagittal and 2 transverse multiple and average them for added accuracy.
b. Suprapubic Area:
Applying a similar strategy but now placing the probe perpendicular to the skin in the midline, approximately 5-10 cm below the umbilicus.
Measure the thickness of the SAT from the inner surface of the skin to the outer surface of the linea alba.
Take 2 sagittal and 2 transverse multiple and average them for added accuracy.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
431797
0
On the same day of ultrasound
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
431798
0
Bladder fullness
Query!
Assessment method [3]
431798
0
Bladder fullness will be assess as full, half full and empty, as previously described in the published article" Accuracy of Gastrointestinal Ultrasound
and Calprotectin in the Assessment of Inflammation and its Location in Patients with an Ileoanal Pouch"
Query!
Timepoint [3]
431798
0
On the same day of ultrasound
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
432586
0
The reliability of bowel composite bowel wall thickness and colour doppler in assessing rectal inflammation
Query!
Assessment method [4]
432586
0
The reliability of TAUS and TPUS tools will be assessed a two-way random-effects intraclass coefficient (ICC) estimate
Query!
Timepoint [4]
432586
0
One the same day of ultrasound
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Participants: Adults with known or suspected IBD involving the rectum undergoing colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy for any clinical indication and IUS within 30 days.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
75
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Ileoanal pouch
Previous proctectomy
Diverted bowel
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Query!
Duration
Cross-sectional
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The overall accuracy of the ultrasound methods TAUS and TPUS will be assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Their accuracy at assessing severity of ICI colitis will be assessed by correlating colonoscopy features and Mayo and UCEIS scores, using the Spearman’s rank order correlation. The reliability of TAUS and TPUS tools will be assessed a two-way random-effects intraclass coefficient (ICC) estimate
Regression analysis to determine the relationship between SAT thickness, bladder fullness, and ultrasound image quality or accuracy.
ROC curve to determine SAT thickness cut-off for optimal rectal visualization transabdominally.
Paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test (if the data is not normally distributed) to compare SAT measurements from the two sites. Pearson or spearmen rank can also be used to correlate the two.
McNemar's test to compare accuracy between transabdominal and transperineal methods.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/09/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
28/12/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
28/12/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
120
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
26185
0
The Alfred - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
42058
0
3004 - Melbourne
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
315854
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
315854
0
The Alfred
Query!
Address [1]
315854
0
Query!
Country [1]
315854
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
The Alfred
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
317989
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
317989
0
None
Query!
Address [1]
317989
0
Query!
Country [1]
317989
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
314707
0
Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
314707
0
https://www.alfredhealth.org.au/research/ethics-research-governance
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
314707
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
314707
0
01/07/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
314707
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
314707
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of transabdominal and trans-perineal ultrasound in assessing the rectum, using colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy as the reference standard, and to explore the impact of subcutaneous adipose tissue(SAT) and bladder fullness on image quality and accuracy.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
132466
0
Dr Zaid Ardalan
Query!
Address
132466
0
The Alfred Hospital 99 commercial road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
Query!
Country
132466
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
132466
0
+61 409730301
Query!
Fax
132466
0
Query!
Email
132466
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
132467
0
Zaid Ardalan
Query!
Address
132467
0
The Alfred Hospital 99 commercial road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
Query!
Country
132467
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
132467
0
+61 409730301
Query!
Fax
132467
0
Query!
Email
132467
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
132468
0
Zaid Ardalan
Query!
Address
132468
0
The Alfred Hospital 99 commercial road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
Query!
Country
132468
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
132468
0
+61 409730301
Query!
Fax
132468
0
Query!
Email
132468
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
de-identified data of all outcomes
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Once research is published data will be available with no end date
Query!
Available to whom?
Everyone who has access to the published article
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Any analysis as data will be raw
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
The practice is for the journals to upload a link to the data along with the published article.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF