Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12624000867594p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
13/06/2024
Date registered
16/07/2024
Date last updated
29/10/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
16/07/2024
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparing the effectiveness of using Optiflow Switch vs standard facemask during anaesthesia induction: a randomized controlled trial
Query!
Scientific title
Comparing the effectiveness of using Optiflow Switch vs standard facemask during anaesthesia induction in adults: a randomized controlled trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
312163
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anaesthesiology
333880
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
330557
330557
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants will receive high flow nasal oxygen therapy through the Optiflow Switch device during anaesthetic induction. High flow nasal oxygen at 30L/min for 30 seconds and then increased to 40L/min will be provided during pre-oxygenation before induction. Patient will be asked to breath through the nose with the mouth closed. After 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation, high flow oxygen flow rate is then increased to 70L/min when anesthetic induction begins. As soon as the patient loses consciousness, a facemask connected to a standard anaesthetic machine will be applied on top of the Optiflow Switch nasal cannula . Bag-mask ventilation (BMV) will then commence while waiting for muscle relaxation. After 90 seconds of BMV, patient will then be intubated while high flow oxygen at 70L/min continues to be delivered through the nasal cannula. The Optiflow device will then be removed once patient is intubated. Non-compliance to the intervention will be recorded as "failure rate - need to abandon the allocated device", which is one of the secondary outcomes.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
328651
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Participants in the control group will receive usual care. In standard care, participants will receive pre-oxygenation through a standard facemask, which is connected to an anaesthetic machine set on manual ventilation mode. Bag-mask ventilation will commence as soon as the patient loses consciousness. BMV will continue while waiting for muscle relaxation. After 90 seconds of BMV, anaesthetist will then remove the facemask and commence intubation.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
338359
0
To compare the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) immediately post-intubation in patients having oxygen delivery through Optiflow Switch vs standard facemask during anaesthesia induction.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
338359
0
Arterial blood samples (ABG) will be taken through the established arterial line by one of the investigators. The blood gas machine at the study institution will analyse the results.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
338359
0
After successful intubation and before mechanical ventilation is commenced.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
435635
0
To compare the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) after 3-minute pre-oxygenation and immediately pre intubation between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
435635
0
Arterial blood samples (ABG) will be taken through the established arterial line by one of the investigators. The blood gas machine at the study institution will analyse the results.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
435635
0
After three minutes of pre-oxygenation and Immediately before intubation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
436195
0
To compare the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) after 3-minute pre-oxygenation; immediately pre-intubation and immediately post-intubation between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
436195
0
Arterial blood samples (ABG) will be taken through the established arterial line by one of the investigators. The blood gas machine at the study institution will analyse the results.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
436195
0
After three minutes of pre-oxygenation, immediately before intubation and immediately after intubation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
436197
0
To compare the saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2) after 3-minute pre-oxygenation; immediately pre-intubation and immediately post-intubation between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
436197
0
Arterial blood samples (ABG) will be taken through the established arterial line by one of the investigators. The blood gas machine at the study institution will analyse the results.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
436197
0
After three minutes of pre-oxygenation, immediately before intubation and immediately after intubation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
436198
0
To compare the number of hypoxic episodes (oxygen saturation below 90%) during anaesthetic induction (from pre-oxygenation till successful intubation) between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
436198
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form. Oxygen saturation will be displayed on the anaesthetic machine monitor, which is a standard routine practice.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
436198
0
During anaesthetic induction (from pre-oxygenation till successful intubation).
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
436199
0
To compare failure rate (need to abandon the allocated device or abandon the protocol) between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
436199
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
436199
0
During anaesthetic induction (from pre-oxygenation till successful intubation).
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
436200
0
Ability to obtain a seal to bag-mask ventilate (BMV) over the Optiflow Switch.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
436200
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
436200
0
During anaesthetic induction (from pre-oxygenation till successful intubation).
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
436201
0
To compare airway adjuncts used between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
436201
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
436201
0
During anaesthetic induction (from pre-oxygenation till successful intubation).
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
436203
0
To compare the train of four (TOF) counts and ratios at the time of first intubation attempt between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
436203
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
436203
0
At the time of first intubation attempt.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
436204
0
To compare time taken for successful intubation between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [9]
436204
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
436204
0
From the time of insertion of laryngoscope till successful intubation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
436205
0
To compare the number of intubation attempts between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
436205
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
436205
0
During intubation attempts
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
436206
0
To compare all other complications, such as hypoxia, arrhythmia, myocardial ischaemia, cardiac or respiratory arrest, between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [11]
436206
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
436206
0
During anaesthetic induction (from pre-oxygenation till successful intubation).
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
436207
0
To compare patient's tolerance to the device between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [12]
436207
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data (comfortable scale out of 3) directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
436207
0
During the pre-oxygenation phase.
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
436209
0
Anaesthetists’ rating on the ease of bag-mask ventilation over the Optiflow Switch, overall satisfaction score and any other comments.
Query!
Assessment method [13]
436209
0
One of the investigators will be asking the treating anaesthetist to rate (from 1-5) the ease of BMV and satisfaction score, and to provide any comments.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
436209
0
After successful intubation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
436224
0
To compare the success rate of bag-mask ventilation between the two oxygen delivery techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [14]
436224
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
436224
0
During bag-mask ventilation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
437058
0
To compare intubation success rate between the two oxygen delivery techniques
Query!
Assessment method [15]
437058
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
437058
0
During intubation attempts
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
437059
0
To compare intubation technique used between the two oxygen delivery techniques
Query!
Assessment method [16]
437059
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
437059
0
During intubation attempts
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
437060
0
To compare the need to revert back to bag-mask ventilation during intubation between the two oxygen delivery techniques
Query!
Assessment method [17]
437060
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
437060
0
During intubation attempts
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
441136
0
To compare the highest and lowest residual flow on pressure relief device
Query!
Assessment method [18]
441136
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
441136
0
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
441137
0
To compare the highest and lowest residual flow on pressure relief device
Query!
Assessment method [19]
441137
0
One of the investigators will be present during anaesthetic induction to record the data directly onto the case report form.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
441137
0
During bag-mask ventilation.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patient inclusion criteria:
• Adult patients aged great than or equal to 18 years
• American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA) 1-3
• Able to give informed consent
• Having surgical operation, requiring general anaesthesia for asleep oro-tracheal intubation
• Require arterial line insertion pre-operatively
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria:
• Non-English speaking
• Risk of aspiration
• Known or anticipated difficult airway
• Patients require awake fibre-optic intubation, gas induction or rapid sequence induction
• Known allergy to propofol or rocuronium
• Known basal skull fracture
• Active nasal bleed
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software (i.e. computerised sequence generation) in blocks of ten.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
18/11/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
50
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
316527
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
316527
0
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
316527
0
Query!
Country [1]
316527
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
318798
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
318798
0
Query!
Address [1]
318798
0
Query!
Country [1]
318798
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
315321
0
The Royal Melbourne Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
315321
0
https://www.thermh.org.au/research/researchers/ethics
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
315321
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
315321
0
16/10/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
315321
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
315321
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
In this study, we plan to compare two techniques of supplying oxygen to patients during general anaesthetic induction for surgery. The usual way of doing this procedure involves patient breathing about 10L/min oxygen through a standard facemask before being induced. Once the patient is asleep, the anaesthetist helps bag-mask ventilate the patient via the facemask while waiting for complete muscle relaxation for the intubation. During intubation, the facemask is removed. In this study, a computer program will randomly allocate patients to receive oxygen via one of the two devices: 1) Optiflow Switch or 2) standard facemask. The Optiflow Switch is a relatively new device, which can deliver oxygen at a very high flow rate (up to 70L/min) via two prongs in the nose. It also allows seamless transition to facemask ventilation by diverting nasal oxygen flow away from the patient when a facemask is applied on top of the nasal apparatus. Therefore, for the Optiflow Switch group, patients will receive high flow oxygen through the nasal prongs before going to sleep and during intubation, but bag-mask ventilation in between while waiting for complete muscle paralysis. The study aims to test if the Optiflow Switch provides a higher oxygen level compared to standard facemask when used during anaesthesia induction.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
134330
0
A/Prof Irene Ng
Query!
Address
134330
0
300 Grattan Street, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 3N Department of Anaesthesia and Pain, Parkville VIC 3050
Query!
Country
134330
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
134330
0
+613 93427540
Query!
Fax
134330
0
Query!
Email
134330
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
134331
0
Shan Hung
Query!
Address
134331
0
300 Grattan Street, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 3N Department of Anaesthesia and Pain, Parkville VIC 3050
Query!
Country
134331
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
134331
0
+613 93428107
Query!
Fax
134331
0
Query!
Email
134331
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
134332
0
Irene Ng
Query!
Address
134332
0
300 Grattan Street, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 3N Department of Anaesthesia and Pain, Parkville VIC 3050
Query!
Country
134332
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
134332
0
+613 93427540
Query!
Fax
134332
0
Query!
Email
134332
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF