Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12624001240538
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
20/09/2024
Date registered
9/10/2024
Date last updated
9/10/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
9/10/2024
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Implementation of the Choose to Move program in Sydney Australia for people aged 50 and over
Query!
Scientific title
Evaluating Implementation of the Choose to Move program in Sydney Australia for people aged 50 and over
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
312624
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1311-1269
Query!
Trial acronym
CTM
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
physical inactivity
334568
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
331170
331170
0
0
Query!
Health promotion/education
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
331884
331884
0
0
Query!
Other physical medicine / rehabilitation
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Choose to Move (CTM) is a community-based program, co-designed with older adults, that increases physical activity and mobility and reduces social isolation.
The Choose to Move program was successfully developed and implemented in Canada by the Active Aging Research Team at the University of British Columbia, with funding from the Government of British Columbia. Choose to Move was rigorously developed with implementation science principles. It is scalable, co-designed, adaptable, tailored for communities, and based on authentic partnerships.
Choose to Move integrates behaviour change principles into the following components:
1. A one-on-one consultation (1 x 30-minutes) with the activity coach in week 2. The consultation helps participants set health-related goals and develop a physical activity action plan that fits their routine and suits their interests, goals, abilities, and resources. The consultation session will be delivered face to face or by telephone or videoconference as preferred by the participant. The activity coach will have experience working with older adults and be aware of supports and services in their community to help facilitate physical activity behaviour change. The coaching session is a one-off session and will take place in week two of the program. The session will also draw on evidence-based behaviour change techniques, practice, and theories to help participants set goals, action plan, and provide accountability.
2. Group meetings (8 x 1-hour) led by activity coaches where participants connect with others in their group to share experiences, encourage and motivate each other. Participants learn about various health topics (e.g., falls prevention, stress management, nutrition) and resources available in their communities from the activity coach. Participants receive the most support during the first six weeks of the program. The first six weeks includes contact every week via a one-on-one consultation and 5 group meetings. This provides the individual and group support they need to set goals and to build physical activity into their lives. In the final six weeks, participants attend three group meetings, during weeks 8, 10, and 12. These meetings help keep participants on-track and set longer-term goals as they approach the end of Choose to Move.
The principles for guiding these components are underpinned by the theoretical models of behaviour change (Self-Determination Theory and the COM-B Model). The self-determination theory outlines three aspects of motivation for behaivour change (autonomy, competence and relatedness) whereas the COM-B model provides a framework for three aspects that drive behaviour change (capability, opportunity and motivation). Behaviour change practice techniques will include goal setting and motivational interviewing (MI). These techniques will be used in discussing with participants what physical activity they would like to do and feel they can do and used in the group meetings to enhance socialisation and physical activity engagement. Participants will be encouraged to identify strengths, barriers and strategies to improving physical activity and social connection. Activity coaches will assist planning, self-monitoring and evaluation of these goals.
3. Access to the Choose to Move Website: Participants will have access to the Choose to Move website designed specifically for this study that contains a collection of trusted resources specific to the context of Sydney, Australia. Materials and information include links to exercise videos and printable resources on topics such as strength, balance, flexibility, bone and joint health. Participants will have the ability to access the resources at their own discretion. https://choosetomove.org.au/
4. Facebook page: Participants will have access to the public Choose to Move Facebook page which will have resources and information on physical activity. https://www.facebook.com/ChooseToMovement
5. Resources (Group meeting PowerPoint presentations, handouts and fortnightly newsletters): Each group meeting will have a PowerPoint presentation focused on a specific health topic that the activity coaches will deliver. After each group meeting there is an accompanying handout. It includes a summary of key information specific to individual group meeting as well as links to additional resources. They will emphasise the importance of being active, maintaining of health and physical function. Participants also have the option of signing up for a fortnightly newsletter to receive updates about the program and receive additional resources to help keep active.
Strategies used to monitor adherence will include sessions attendance list (group meeting and one on one check list).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
329142
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [2]
329325
0
Behaviour
Query!
Intervention code [3]
329326
0
Lifestyle
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
This is an uncontrolled, single group implementation study that is focused on implementing the Choose to Move program across Sydney, Australia. All participants will receive the Choose to Move program for 3 months, so masking is not required.
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
338935
0
Self reported moderate physical activity (days per week).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
338935
0
The primary outcome physical activity will be assessed using the single item measure of self-reported number of days in a week engaging in at least 30 minutes of moderate physical activity.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
338935
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
437949
0
Self reported functional balance activity
Query!
Assessment method [1]
437949
0
Single item question how many days per week do you do activities that emphasise balance and functional mobility training, such as yoga or Tai Chi or home exercises?
Query!
Timepoint [1]
437949
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
437950
0
Health limitations affecting activities
Query!
Assessment method [2]
437950
0
Short Form 36 health survey
Query!
Timepoint [2]
437950
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
437951
0
Ability to walk 400m
Query!
Assessment method [3]
437951
0
Self-reported question: Do you have any difficulty walking 400m (that is 2 to 3 blocks) outside on a level ground? (If yes, how much difficulty? Some, Much or Unable to do)
Query!
Timepoint [3]
437951
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
437952
0
Ability to climb 1 flight of stairs
Query!
Assessment method [4]
437952
0
Self-reported question: Do you have any difficulty walking up 10 steps, that is about one flight, without resting?
Query!
Timepoint [4]
437952
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
437955
0
Sedentary behaviour
Query!
Assessment method [5]
437955
0
Sedentary behaviour questionnaire (Number of hours spent in sitting each day)
Query!
Timepoint [5]
437955
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
437956
0
Quality of life
Query!
Assessment method [6]
437956
0
EuroQol EQ-5D-5L
Query!
Timepoint [6]
437956
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
437957
0
Social Isolation
Query!
Assessment method [7]
437957
0
Social isolation questionnaire
Query!
Timepoint [7]
437957
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
437958
0
Loneliness Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [8]
437958
0
Loneliness lifestyle questionnaire
Query!
Timepoint [8]
437958
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
437959
0
Self-perceived balance
Query!
Assessment method [9]
437959
0
Self-reported question: (“How would you rate your balance: excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor”)
Query!
Timepoint [9]
437959
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
437960
0
Self-reported fear of falling
Query!
Assessment method [10]
437960
0
Response to single item question (“Are you afraid of falling? (1 = not at all, 2 = little bit, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a lot, 5 = extremely”)
Query!
Timepoint [10]
437960
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
437961
0
Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [11]
437961
0
Self perseved single item question: Experience any adverse events due to becoming more physically active?
Query!
Timepoint [11]
437961
0
3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
437962
0
Lower extremity function
Query!
Assessment method [12]
437962
0
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Query!
Timepoint [12]
437962
0
Baseline and 3 month post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
437963
0
Self-reported muscle strengthening activities
Query!
Assessment method [13]
437963
0
Single item question: How many days per week do you do muscle strengthening activities, such as resistance training with weights or bodyweight exercises?
Query!
Timepoint [13]
437963
0
Baseline, 3 months and 9 months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
439901
0
Reach- Proportion of the intended priority audience (i.e., participants) who participate in the intervention
Query!
Assessment method [14]
439901
0
Screening survey from recruitment website; baseline data form.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
439901
0
At completion of recruitment of sample size (160 participants) within 4 weeks after study period.
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
439902
0
Adoption- Proportion and representatives of providers or the delivery team that deliver an intervention
Query!
Assessment method [15]
439902
0
Study specific document maintained by trial manager
Query!
Timepoint [15]
439902
0
At the completion of recruitment of activity coaches.
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
439903
0
Fidelity- The extent to which an intervention is implemented as it was prescribed in the intervention protocol - by the delivery team
Query!
Assessment method [16]
439903
0
Study specific records to determine extent to which the intervention was delivered as per protocol and extent of delivery if implementation strategies
Query!
Timepoint [16]
439903
0
3 months post baseline.
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
439904
0
Dose (Delivered)- Intended units of each intervention component delivered to participants by the delivery team
Query!
Assessment method [17]
439904
0
Study specific records to measure the intervention dose delivered and does of implementation strategies delivered
Query!
Timepoint [17]
439904
0
3 months post baseline.
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
439905
0
Implementation determinant: Acceptability (delivery team)- Perceptions among the delivery team that a given intervention is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory
Query!
Assessment method [18]
439905
0
Qualitative interviews/focus groups with delivery team
Query!
Timepoint [18]
439905
0
Within 2 weeks after study completion for all 160 participants.
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
439906
0
Implementation determinant: Acceptability (participants)- Perceptions among the participants that a given intervention is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory
Query!
Assessment method [19]
439906
0
1) Study-specific documents on intervention components (e.g., agreement and participation in health coaching sessions); 2) data from number who attended sessions 3) Quantitative survey rating different elements of intervention; 4). Qualitative interviews with sub-group participants.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
439906
0
3 months post baseline.
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
439907
0
Implementation determinant: Cost- Money spent on design, adaptation and implementation of an intervention. This will be assessed as a composite outcome
Query!
Assessment method [20]
439907
0
Study-specific log recording costs
Query!
Timepoint [20]
439907
0
Weekly for the duration of the entire study period.
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
439908
0
Implementation determinant: Feasibility- Perceptions among the delivery team that an intervention can be successfully used or carried out within a given organisation or setting
Query!
Assessment method [21]
439908
0
Qualitative interviews and feedback survey with delivery team
Query!
Timepoint [21]
439908
0
Within 4 weeks after study completion for all 160 participants.
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
439909
0
Implementation determinant: Context- Aspects of a larger social, political, and economic environment that may influence intervention implementation. This will be assessed as a composite outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [22]
439909
0
Field notes kept by Research Manager based on Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
Query!
Timepoint [22]
439909
0
Weekly for the duration of the entire study period.
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
439910
0
Implementation determinant: Adaptability- Extent to which an intervention can be adapted, tailored, refined, or reinvented to meet local needs. This will be assessed as a composite outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [23]
439910
0
Study-specific document guided by expanded Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based interventions (FRAME) framework
Query!
Timepoint [23]
439910
0
Within 4 weeks after study completion for all 160 participants.
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
439911
0
Implementation determinant: Potential for scale-up- The scalability (the ability of a health intervention shown to be efficacious on a small scale and/or under controlled conditions to be expanded under real world conditions to reach a greater proportion of the eligible population while retaining effectiveness of a discrete health program or intervention
Query!
Assessment method [24]
439911
0
Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT)
Query!
Timepoint [24]
439911
0
Within 4 weeks after study completion for all 160 participants.
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
440335
0
Falls
Query!
Assessment method [25]
440335
0
Retrospective self-report of number of falls
Query!
Timepoint [25]
440335
0
Baseline (past 12 months), 3 months (program duration, 9 months (past 6 months post program)
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
440336
0
Falls related injuries
Query!
Assessment method [26]
440336
0
Retrospective self-reported fall related injuries
Query!
Timepoint [26]
440336
0
Baseline (past 12 months), 3 months (program duration, 9 months (past 6 months post program)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria
The study will involve consenting adults who:
are aged 50 and over.
consider themselves inactive (do less than 150 minutes of moderate physical activity per week).
want to receive support to be more active.
are able to commit to a 3-month program.
live in the community across Sydney.
Query!
Minimum age
50
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria
The study will exclude adults who:
have insufficient English language skills to fully participate in the program.
have a medical condition that precludes participation in regular physical activity.
have a diagnosed cognitive impairment.
have a progressive neurological disease (e.g., Parkinson‘s disease).
are unable to leave the house independently and walk 10 metres unassisted.
do not have access to internet if choose to do an online class.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Sample size estimation:
16 programs with an average of 10 participants per program will provide a total of 160 participants to detect a difference in the proportion of participants who increase their physical activity level from baseline to 3-months (approximately 1 day/week), allowing for 20% dropout. To attain >80% power to detect an increase in PA of approximately 1 day/wk as per CTM Phase 3 (PA by the single-item measure; T1 = 2.5 d/wk.; T2 = 3.4 d/wk.; SD difference = 2.2) with alpha of 0.05 across two comparisons (T2 vs.T1), an intraclass correlation for PA of 0.05 (to account for the clustered design of participants within programs) and estimated 20% drop out.
Quantitative analysis:
Analyses will be guided by a rigorous statistical analysis plan developed a priori as we have done previously. Continuous primary and secondary outcomes will be analysed using linear regression. Dichotomous secondary outcomes will be analysed with chi-squared tests. Analyses will be conducted using Stata 14 software.
Qualitative analysis:
We will use thematic data analysis to analyse the data from interviews and focus groups. For interviews and focus groups, thematic analysis of the audio files, written transcripts and detailed field-notes will be an iterative process that will occur during and after the period of data collection. We will develop a framework to code all data based on the study aims, interview questions and the major topic areas. Significant ideas and themes will be coded and reviewed by members of the research team. This process will be continued until a point when no new findings are identified from the texts and agreement is reached about the final list of themes by research team members.
Cost effectiveness:
The intervention and implementation costs will be used to create a decision analytic model to conduct a simulated cost-effectiveness analysis. The cost of delivering the program will be estimated based on trial records where the resources required to implement the program will be recorded (e.g. staff time, any additional non-staff resources) and costed using appropriate wage rates and other relevant cost data.
Utility-based quality of life will be measured using the EQ5D-5L and the health utility score, which is expressed as an index value for health, will be calculated from the 5 questions using published Australian scoring algorithms13.
Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) will be calculated using the health utility score at baseline, and at the 3 and 9-month follow-up. The number of QALYs gained or lost over the 3 and 9 months of follow-up will be calculated by multiplying the time spent in the health state by the relevant health utility score.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
3/02/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/06/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
30/06/2027
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
160
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
42929
0
2000 - Sydney
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
317059
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
317059
0
The NHMRC-CIHR Healthy Cities Implementation Science Team Grant Scheme grant (APP 2018862) will be funding the study
Query!
Address [1]
317059
0
Query!
Country [1]
317059
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Sydney
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
319308
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
319308
0
Query!
Address [1]
319308
0
Query!
Country [1]
319308
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
315809
0
The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
315809
0
Human Ethics Manager on +61 2 8627 8176 or email human.ethics@sydney.edu.au. Website: https://www.sydney.edu.au/research/research-integrity-and-ethics.html
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
315809
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
315809
0
08/08/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
315809
0
20/09/2024
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
315809
0
2024/HE000347
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Choose to Move (CTM) is a 3-month program that provides motivation and support to adults aged 50 and over to become more physically active and socially connected. CTM was successfully developed and implemented in Canada and has shown to successfully increase physical activity, mobility and reduce social isolation in older adults. The purpose of this study is to adapt this program to suit adults aged 50 and over living in Sydney who are particularly inactive and not well supported by existing programs. This will be through a process of adaptation (co-design implementation strategies to adapt the program for older adults in Sydney), program implementation and delivery (build organisation capacity, support delivery partners on implementation and deliver 3-month intervention) and evaluation (describe and assess implementation strategies used to achieve ‘best fit’ and to measure CTM program benefits for various health outcomes to the older person). We hypothesise: 1. The Choose to Move program and implementation strategies will require minor adaptations to suit the needs of people aged 50 and over in Sydney. 2. The Choose to Move program will be implemented with fidelity. 3. The Choose to Move program will be acceptable and well attended by people aged 50 and over in Sydney. 4. The Choose to Move program will provide benefits to health outcomes to people aged 50 and over in Sydney.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
135870
0
Prof Anne Tiedemann
Query!
Address
135870
0
Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, PO Box M179, Missenden Road, Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country
135870
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
135870
0
+61286276233
Query!
Fax
135870
0
Query!
Email
135870
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
135871
0
Anne Tiedemann
Query!
Address
135871
0
Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, PO Box M179, Missenden Road, Camperdown NSW 20250
Query!
Country
135871
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
135871
0
+61286276233
Query!
Fax
135871
0
Query!
Email
135871
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
135872
0
Anne Tiedemann
Query!
Address
135872
0
Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, PO Box M179, Missenden Road, Camperdown NSW 20250
Query!
Country
135872
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
135872
0
+61286276233
Query!
Fax
135872
0
Query!
Email
135872
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Deidentified participant data for primary and secondary outcomes underlying published results.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
The data will be accessible 3 months following the date of publication of the main results related to this trial and will be available for a period of 5 years post-publication.
Query!
Available to whom?
Data will be available on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the Principal Chief Investigator
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
For meta-analysis.
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Access subject to approval by the Principal Investigator after providing a methodological proposal directed to the Principal Investigator (
[email protected]
).
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
24210
Ethical approval
2024/HE000347
388203-(Uploaded-20-09-2024-11-27-58)-2024_HE000347 approval.pdf
24211
Study protocol
V3 Dated 2.9.2024
388203-(Uploaded-20-09-2024-11-31-18)-Choose to Move Protocol V3 02.09.2024_Clean.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF