Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12624001281583p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
3/10/2024
Date registered
22/10/2024
Date last updated
22/10/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
22/10/2024
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
GluCoast: Dietary strategies for glucose control in type 2 diabetes
Query!
Scientific title
Effect of partial diet replacement or time-restricted eating on tight time-in-range for people with type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
313054
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1307-9673
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Type 2 diabetes
335280
0
Query!
Overweight
335281
0
Query!
Obesity
335468
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Metabolic and Endocrine
331855
331855
0
0
Query!
Diabetes
Query!
Diet and Nutrition
331856
331856
0
0
Query!
Obesity
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This study consists of two separate dietary interventions (time-restricted eating and partial diet replacement), each lasting two weeks. These will be preceded by a two-week period of baseline monitoring and separated by a minimum two-week washout period. During each of the baseline monitoring and washout periods, participants will be asked to adhere to their usual eating habits, with no further lifestyle advice provided. Participants will wear a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor to assess glycaemic control during the two-week baseline monitoring period and each of the two-week dietary interventions. Throughout the duration of the study, participants will be asked to maintain their usual physical activity levels and will continue to receive usual care through their general practice.
Interventions will be delivered by a member of the research team via five individual, face-to-face study visits held at baseline and before and after each two-week dietary intervention. Participants will also have an initial Zoom/phone call/in-person visit to assess eligibility and provide study information. ‘Check ins’ and additional support (if required) will be available via text, phone call, or email between visits. The expected duration of participation is eight weeks (longer if the participant requires additional time between visits and/or a washout period longer than two weeks). Study visits will be held in a local hospital/clinical/office space and are expected to last 30–60 minutes each. Study visits will include (as appropriate) administering the interventions, providing participants with required resources (e.g. meal replacement products; adherence checklists); application/removal of CGM sensors; data collection (e.g. weight; blood pressure; questionnaires; qualitative interviews); and post-intervention review of adherence checklists, diet records, and reported side effects. After completing both interventions, participants will be offered an optional in-person review of their continuous glucose monitoring results and (if appropriate) self-reported dietary intakes. This may include individualised nutrition education and advice. This review may take place during the final study visit or at a later date.
Time-restricted eating intervention:
In the time-restricted eating intervention, participants will be asked to maintain their usual food choices but to restrict their intake of all food and energy-containing beverages (e.g., tea/coffee with milk) to a self-selected 9-hour window ending no later than 7:00pm. No further dietary advice (e.g. food choice, portion size, diet quality, or meal timing within window) will be provided. Participants will be asked to adhere to the same self-selected eating window on as many days as possible during the entire two-week time-restricted eating intervention. For example, participants may choose to consume all food and energy-containing beverages between 10:00am and 7:00pm each day for two weeks, or between 8:45am and 5:45pm each day for two weeks. Participants may freely consume non-nutritive beverages (i.e., water, plain tea, black coffee, and zero-energy/diet drinks) throughout the intervention. Intervention adherence will be assessed using a three-day diet record (on paper or app-based) and a daily adherence checklist (including the time of the first and last eating occasion). These will be completed by participants and checked for accuracy at the next study visit.
Partial diet replacement intervention:
In the partial diet replacement intervention, participants will be asked to maintain their usual food choices, except for replacing any two main meals per day with the meal replacement products we provide. Participants will be asked to adhere to this approach on as many days as possible throughout the entire two-week partial diet replacement intervention, but the timing of meal/meal replacement consumption needn’t be the same each day. For example, participants might choose to consume meal replacements at breakfast and lunch with a ‘real food’ dinner on Day 1, followed by meal replacements at breakfast and dinner with a ‘real food’ lunch on Day 2. Meal replacement products (Cambridge Weight Plan Ltd., Corby, Northants, UK) will be provided free of charge, and a variety of options (e.g., shakes, soups, bars, porridges, and meals) and flavours will be available. Each meal replacement product has an energy content of approximately 850 kJ (~200 kcal).
Participants may freely consume non-nutritive beverages (i.e., water, plain tea, black coffee, and zero-energy/diet drinks) throughout the intervention. Intervention adherence will be assessed using a three-day diet record (on paper or app-based) and a daily adherence checklist (including the number of meal replacements and real-food meals consumed). These will be completed by participants and checked for accuracy at the next study visit.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
329609
0
Lifestyle
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
As this is a randomised crossover trial, each participant acts as their own comparator/control. The two-week baseline monitoring period will allow us to examine changes in measures including CGM glycaemic control and dietary intake.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
339472
0
24-hour time in tight range (TITR)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
339472
0
Measured as the time spent in the range 3.9–7.8 mmol/L, assessed via continuous glucose monitoring
Query!
Timepoint [1]
339472
0
Baseline and during each dietary intervention
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
339473
0
Acceptability of the dietary intervention
Query!
Assessment method [2]
339473
0
Assessed via semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews using study-specific interview guides
Query!
Timepoint [2]
339473
0
Post-completion of each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
440128
0
Body weight (kg)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
440128
0
Measured on a Tanita body weight scale
Query!
Timepoint [1]
440128
0
Baseline and pre- and post-completion of each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
440129
0
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Query!
Assessment method [2]
440129
0
Taken as the average of three measures from an automated sphygmomanometer after being seated for five minutes
Query!
Timepoint [2]
440129
0
Baseline and pre- and post-completion of each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
440130
0
Body fat percentage
Query!
Assessment method [3]
440130
0
Measured by Tanita bioelectrical impedance analysis scales
Query!
Timepoint [3]
440130
0
Baseline and pre- and post-completion of each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
440131
0
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
440131
0
Calculated as weight at that timepoint (kg) divided by height at baseline (m) squared. Weight will be measured on a Tanita body weight scale; height will be measured using a stadiometer.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
440131
0
Baseline and pre- and post-completion of each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
440132
0
24-hour time in range (TIR)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
440132
0
Measured as the time spent in the range 3.9–10.0 mmol/L, assessed via continuous glucose
Query!
Timepoint [5]
440132
0
Baseline and during each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
440133
0
24-hour mean blood glucose
Query!
Assessment method [6]
440133
0
Assessed via continuous glucose monitoring over two weeks
Query!
Timepoint [6]
440133
0
Baseline and during each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
440134
0
Glycaemic variability
Query!
Assessment method [7]
440134
0
Measured as the mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion (MAGE) for each 24-hour period captured by continuous glucose monitoring
Query!
Timepoint [7]
440134
0
Baseline and during each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
440135
0
Glycaemic variability
Query!
Assessment method [8]
440135
0
Measured as the standard deviation (SD) of the 24-hour mean blood glucose captured by continuous glucose monitoring
Query!
Timepoint [8]
440135
0
Baseline and during each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
440136
0
Glycaemic variability
Query!
Assessment method [9]
440136
0
Measured as the coefficient of variation (CV) of the 24-hour mean blood glucose captured by continuous glucose monitoring
Query!
Timepoint [9]
440136
0
Baseline and during each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
440137
0
Time above glycaemic range (TBR)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
440137
0
Measured as the time spent >10.0 mmol/L, assessed via continuous glucose monitoring
Query!
Timepoint [10]
440137
0
Baseline and during each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
440138
0
Time below range (TBR)
Query!
Assessment method [11]
440138
0
Measured as the time spent <3.9 mmol/L, assessed via continuous glucose monitoring
Query!
Timepoint [11]
440138
0
Baseline and during each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
440139
0
Measures of nocturnal glycaemic control
Query!
Assessment method [12]
440139
0
Measured via continuous glucose monitoring data obtained between 12:00AM and 05:59AM
Query!
Timepoint [12]
440139
0
Baseline and during each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
440140
0
Measures of daytime glycaemic control
Query!
Assessment method [13]
440140
0
Measured via continuous glucose monitoring data obtained between 6:00AM and 11:59PM
Query!
Timepoint [13]
440140
0
Baseline and during each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
440141
0
Dietary intake (energy and nutrient intake)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
440141
0
Measured via self-reported three-day diet records
Query!
Timepoint [14]
440141
0
Baseline and during each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
440142
0
Occurrence of side effects
Query!
Assessment method [15]
440142
0
Measured as the self-reported occurrence of side effects potentially related to the dietary intervention
Query!
Timepoint [15]
440142
0
During each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
440143
0
Physical activity level
Query!
Assessment method [16]
440143
0
Measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; Craig et al, 2003)
Query!
Timepoint [16]
440143
0
Baseline and pre- and post-completion of each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
440144
0
Diet satisfaction
Query!
Assessment method [17]
440144
0
Measured by the Diet Satisfaction Score (Jospe et al, 2020)
Query!
Timepoint [17]
440144
0
Baseline and pre- and post-completion each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
440145
0
Quality of life
Query!
Assessment method [18]
440145
0
Measured by the EQ-5D-5L (The EuroQol Group, 1990)
Query!
Timepoint [18]
440145
0
Baseline and pre- and post-completion each dietary intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
440146
0
Adherence to the dietary intervention
Query!
Assessment method [19]
440146
0
Assessed via self-reported daily adherence checklists
Query!
Timepoint [19]
440146
0
During each dietary intervention
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Participants will be aged 18–80 years, with overweight or obesity and medically-diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Participants must be willing to participate in both dietary interventions for a period of two weeks each (including consuming meal replacement products which may contain milk/dairy and/or gluten) and be willing to wear only a blinded CGM sensor (i.e., not wear a CGM for personal use) for up to six weeks in total.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
• Not weight stable (i.e., >5 kg change in body weight in the previous 3 months)
• Doctor-prescribed change to glucose-lowering or anti-obesity medications in the last 3 months
• Current insulin use
• Previous weight loss surgery
• Night shift worker (i.e., working >3 hours between 10pm and 5am at least once per week in the previous 3 months or over the study duration)
• Myocardial infarction in the last three months
• Currently receiving cancer treatment
• Diagnosed or self-reported eating disorder
• Pregnancy or lactation (current or planned over the study duration).
Eligibility may also be affected by prescribed medications which increase the risk of hypoglycaemia (e.g., sulfonylureas) or which must be taken with food in the early morning or late evening (i.e., outside the time-restricted eating window). Food allergies or intolerances may also limit the variety of meal replacement products suitable for some individuals. These issues will be discussed with participants and the appropriate health professional on a case-by-case basis.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation by computer (built into REDCap online portal).
The evening before each participant attends their first intervention session the next sequential randomization will be revealed and assigned. Participants will not be notified of which intervention they are completing until they arrive at their first session. By process of elimination however, participants will know their second intervention as soon as they begin the first intervention session.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a computerised sequence generation, no stratification. The randomisation sequence will be generated using Stata software and concealed electronically.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
We intend to recruit a sample of 30 participants as we consider this to be a feasible and recruitment target. Specifying a two-sided alpha level of 0.05 (Type I error) and assuming both approximately equal standard deviations in each intervention and a within-person correlation of 0.5, a total sample size of n=30 will ensure 80% power to detect a 0.53 standard deviation difference in the primary quantitative outcome (24-hour TITR) between the partial diet replacement and time-restricted eating interventions. Furthermore, n=30 will provide 90% power to detect a 0.62 standard deviation difference. With respect to the assessment of intervention acceptability, n=30 is a large sample size for qualitative analysis. We expect a sample this size to provide ample data to sufficiently address the qualitative aim of the proposed study.
Statistical analyses will be conducted according to intention-to-treat principles. Linear mixed effects models will be used to investigate the difference in the primary outcome (24-hour TITR) between the two interventions. This regression approach will incorporate participant as a random effect and adjust for both baseline 24-hour TITR and randomisation order. Stata software version 18.0 will be used for all statistical analyses with two-sided p<0.05 considered statistically significant.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/10/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/10/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
26575
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
26575
0
West Coast (South Island)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
317496
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
317496
0
Edgar Diabetes and Obesity Research Centre of the University of Otago, Aotearoa New Zealand
Query!
Address [1]
317496
0
Query!
Country [1]
317496
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr Andrew Reynolds, University of Otago, Aotearoa New Zealand
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
319850
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
319850
0
Query!
Address [1]
319850
0
Query!
Country [1]
319850
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
316207
0
Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
316207
0
https://ethics.health.govt.nz/about/northern-b-health-and-disability-ethics-committee/
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
316207
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
316207
0
18/09/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
316207
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
316207
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Appropriate nutrition is a cornerstone of type 2 diabetes management guidelines internationally. Dietary strategies which improve glucose control may prevent or delay the onset of diabetes-related complications including neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy. Partial meal replacement and time-restricted eating are each dietary strategies which may lead to meaningful improvements in glucose control for people with type 2 diabetes. These interventions are also two very different approaches: one uses formula meal replacements to limit energy intake, while the other is primarily focused on changing meal timing rather than the quantity or quality of intake. As such, one intervention may be more (or less) acceptable than the other for different people and for different reasons. In this study we will consider the effect of these two dietary interventions on blood glucose control in 30 people with type 2 diabetes. In the time-restricted eating intervention, participants will consume their usual foods within a chosen 9- hour eating window (e.g. 8am-5pm or 10am-7pm). In the partial diet replacement intervention, participants will replace 2 of their usual meals with low-energy formula meal replacement products supplied by us. This is a crossover study, meaning participants will take part in both interventions for a period of 2 weeks each, separated by a 'washout period' (i.e. returning to normal eating patterns) of at least 2 weeks. We will quantify and compare the effects of these two interventions on glucose control, and conduct interviews to explore intervention acceptability and understand participants' experiences within the study. Our research questions are: among people with type 2 diabetes, which of these two dietary strategies (time-restricted eating or partial diet replacement) is more effective in improving glucose control, and which is more acceptable? While we hypothesise that both dietary interventions will result in improved glucose control, we expect that the acceptability of each intervention will vary depending on a number of individual and social factors.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
137146
0
Dr Andrew Reynolds
Query!
Address
137146
0
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin Otago 9012, New Zealand
Query!
Country
137146
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
137146
0
+64 279565826
Query!
Fax
137146
0
Query!
Email
137146
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
137147
0
Kate Campbell
Query!
Address
137147
0
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin Otago 9012, New Zealand
Query!
Country
137147
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
137147
0
+64 279565826
Query!
Fax
137147
0
Query!
Email
137147
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
137148
0
Andrew Reynolds
Query!
Address
137148
0
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin Otago 9012, New Zealand
Query!
Country
137148
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
137148
0
+64 279565826
Query!
Fax
137148
0
Query!
Email
137148
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF