Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01822119
Registration number
NCT01822119
Ethics application status
Date submitted
19/03/2013
Date registered
2/04/2013
Date last updated
6/02/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
Clinical Performance of a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Solution (Baha® Attract System)
Query!
Scientific title
Clinical Performance of a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Solution (Baha® Attract System). A Multicentre, Open, Prospective Clinical Investigation. 3 Months Investigation With a 6 Months Follow-up
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
CBAS5484
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Deafness
0
0
Query!
Hearing Loss
0
0
Query!
Hearing Loss, Conductive
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Ear
0
0
0
0
Query!
Deafness
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Experimental: Baha Attract System - This transcutaneous solution is based on a magnet coupling using magnets on both side of the skin;
* One implant magnet
* One external magnet on which a sound processor is attached, i.e. the Sound Processor magnet (SP magnet)
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Hearing Performance, PTA4 at 12 Weeks
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The change in pure-tone thresholds in free field measured by the difference in pure tone average PTA4 (Mean of thresholds at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) from the pre-operative unaided condition to the aided situation with the Baha Attract System at week 12.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline before surgery and 12 weeks after surgery
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Hearing Performance, PTA4 at 36 Weeks
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The change in pure-tone thresholds in free field measured by the difference in pure tone average PTA4 (Mean of thresholds at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) from the pre-operative unaided condition to the aided situation with the Baha Attract System at week 36.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline before surgery and 36 weeks after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Hearing Performance, Individual Frequencies
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The change in pure-tone thresholds in free field measured by the difference at individual frequencies from the pre-operative unaided condition to the aided situation with the Baha Attract System at week 36.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline before surgery and 36 weeks after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Hearing Performance, PTA4, Sound Processor on Softband Versus Baha Attract at 36 Weeks
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The change in pure-tone thresholds in free field measured by the difference in pure tone average PTA4 (Mean of thresholds at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) from the pre-operative aided situation with the Sound Processor on a softband to the aided situation with Baha Attract System at week 36.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline before surgery and 36 weeks after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Hearing Performance, Individual Frequencies, Sound Processor on Softband Versus Baha Attract at 36 Weeks
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The change in pure-tone thresholds in free field measured by the difference in hearing levels of individual frequencies from the pre-operative aided situation with the Sound Processor on a softband to the aided situation with Baha Attract System at week 36.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline before surgery and 36 weeks after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Hearing Performance, Speech in Quiet, Unaided Versus Baha Attract at 36 Weeks
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The change in hearing performance, speech in quiet from the pre-operative unaided condition to the aided situation with the Baha Attract System at week 36.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline before surgery and 36 weeks after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Hearing Performance, Speech in Quiet, Aided With the Sound Processor on a Softband Versus Baha Attract at 36 Weeks
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The change in hearing performance, speech in quiet from the pre-operative aided situation with the Sond Processor on a softband to the aided situation with the Baha Attract System at week 36.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline before surgery and 36 weeks after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Hearing Performance, Speech in Noise, Unaided Versus Baha Attract at 36 Weeks
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The change in hearing performance, speech in noise from the pre-operative unaided condition to the aided situation with the Baha Attract System at week 36.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline before surgery and 36 weeks after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Hearing Performance, Speech in Noise, Aided With the Sound Processor on a Softband Versus Baha Attract at 36 Weeks
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The change in hearing performance, speech in noise from the pre-operative aided situation with the Sond Processor on a softband to the aided situation with the Baha Attract System at week 36.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline before surgery and 36 weeks after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Change of APHAB scoring from the unaided pre-operative situation to the aided situation with Baha Attract at 36 weeks. APHAB questionnaire is a 24-item self-assessment inventory that evaluates the benefit experienced by the patient when using hearing amplification compared to the unaided situation. APHAB produces a Global score and scores for four subscales: ease of communication (EC), reverberation (RV), background noise (BN), and aversiveness (AV). The absolute APHAB scale is between 0 and 100%, where 0% indicates no problem and 100% indicates always problem. The change from unaided to aided hearing is presented. A positive value indicates an improvement, a negative value an impairment. This scale applies to all reported scores.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline before surgery and 36 weeks after surgery
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Conductive hearing loss in the implanted ear. Bone conduction thresholds with a pure tone average of 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz <30 decibel (dB) hearing level (HL)
* Single-sided Sensorineural Deafness (SSD). Bone conduction thresholds with a pure tone average of 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz <30 dB hearing level (HL) in the best ear
* Signed informed consent
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Uncontrolled diabetes as judged by the investigator
* Condition that could jeopardize osseointegration and/or wound healing, e.g. osteoporosis, psoriasis and use of corticosteroids
* Unable to follow investigational procedures, e.g. to complete quality of life scales
* Less than 4mm of soft tissue pre-operatively
* Participation in another investigation with pharmaceuticals and/or device
* Condition that may have an impact on the outcome of the investigation as judged by the investigator
* Subjects that have received radiation therapy at the same side of the skull where the Baha Attract will be positioned
* Suitable implant position for the Baha BI300 implant system (4 mm and 3 mm) not found during surgery due to insufficient bone quality and/or bone thickness
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
NA
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/03/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/02/2014
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
27
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
The HEARing CRC & HearWorks, University of Melbourne - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3010 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Santiago
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The rationale behind this clinical performance investigation is to collect data regarding the usability of the Baha Attract System in patients with hearing impairment that are candidates for Baha surgery: * To describe the expected hearing performance with the Baha Attract in comparison to unaided hearing thresholds or a pre-test situation using a sound processor together with a softband * Which sound processor to select, i.e. BP100 vs BP110 * Improve the fitting process for the sound processor * Selection of sound processor magnet at time of fitting and over time
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01822119
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Briggs R, Van Hasselt A, Luntz M, Goycoolea M, Wigren S, Weber P, Smeds H, Flynn M, Cowan R. Clinical performance of a new magnetic bone conduction hearing implant system: results from a prospective, multicenter, clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jun;36(5):834-41. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000712.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Robert Cowan, A/Professor
Query!
Address
0
0
The HEARing CRC & HearWorks, University of Melbourne
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Briggs R, Van Hasselt A, Luntz M, Goycoolea M, Wig...
[
More Details
]
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01822119
Download to PDF