The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01853982




Registration number
NCT01853982
Ethics application status
Date submitted
13/05/2013
Date registered
15/05/2013

Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Intravenous Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Compared to Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Scientific title
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Ceftolozane/Tazobactam With That of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
CXA-NP-11-08
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
7625A-009
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Respiratory 0 0 0 0
Other respiratory disorders / diseases
Infection 0 0 0 0
Other infectious diseases
Infection 0 0 0 0
Studies of infection and infectious agents

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Experimental: Ceftolozane/Tazobactam - 3000 milligrams (mg) ceftolozane/tazobactam (comprised of 2000 mg ceftolozane and 1000 mg tazobactam), administered intravenously (IV), every 8 hours for 8 days

Active comparator: Piperacillin/Tazobactam - 4500 mg piperacillin/tazobactam (comprised of 4000 mg piperacillin and 500 mg tazobactam), administered IV, every 6 hours for 8 days

Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Clinical Response at the End of Therapy Visit
Timepoint [1] 0 0
24 hours after last dose of study drug

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Key

* Participant has received mechanical ventilation for > 48 hours
* Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of 11-35
* Presence of a new or progressive infiltrate on chest x-ray
* Presence of clinical criteria consistent with VAP

Key
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* History of moderate or severe hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics
* Known end stage renal disease or requirement for dialysis

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
- Herston
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
- Meadowbrook
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
- Nambour
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
- Southport
Recruitment hospital [5] 0 0
- Woolloongabba
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
- Herston
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
- Meadowbrook
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
- Nambour
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
- Southport
Recruitment postcode(s) [5] 0 0
- Woolloongabba
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Florida
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Illinois
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Maryland
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Nebraska
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
New York
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Ohio
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Oklahoma
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [11] 0 0
New Zealand
State/province [11] 0 0
Auckland
Country [12] 0 0
New Zealand
State/province [12] 0 0
Christchurch
Country [13] 0 0
New Zealand
State/province [13] 0 0
Wellington

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Obiamiwe Umeh, MD
Address 0 0
Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
What data in particular will be shared?
https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Available to whom?
Available for what types of analyses?
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: http://engagezone.msd.com/ds_documentation.php


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.