Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01882439
Registration number
NCT01882439
Ethics application status
Date submitted
18/06/2013
Date registered
20/06/2013
Date last updated
15/09/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
Tofacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis Subjects With Inadequate Response to TNF Inhibitors
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Doses Of Tofacitinib (Cp-690,550) In Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis And An Inadequate Response To At Least One Tnf Inhibitor
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2013-001368-46
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
A3921125
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
OPAL BEYOND
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Psoriatic Arthritis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Rheumatoid arthritis
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Tofacitinib
Treatment: Drugs - Tofacitinib
Other interventions - Placebo
Treatment: Drugs - Tofacitinib
Other interventions - Placebo
Treatment: Drugs - Tofacitinib
Experimental: Treatment Sequence A - Tofacitinib 5 mg BID for 6 months
Experimental: Treatment Sequence B - Tofacitinib 10 mg BID for 6 months
Placebo Comparator: Treatment Sequence C - Placebo for 3 months then tofacitinib 5 mg BID for 3 months
Placebo Comparator: Treatment Sequence D - Placebo for 3 months then tofacitinib 10 mg BID for 3 months
Treatment: Drugs: Tofacitinib
tablets, 5 mg BID x 6 months
Treatment: Drugs: Tofacitinib
tablets, 10 mg BID x 6 months
Other interventions: Placebo
tablets, to match tofacitinib 5 mg BID x 3 months
Treatment: Drugs: Tofacitinib
tablets, 5 mg BID x 3 months
Other interventions: Placebo
tablets, to match tofacitinib 10 mg BID x 3 months
Treatment: Drugs: Tofacitinib
tablets, 10 mg BID x 3 months
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Greater Than or Equal to (=) 20% (ACR20): Month 3
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ACR20 was calculated as a =20% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and =20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Month 3
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score: Month 3
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a patient has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability. Overall score was computed as the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranged from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Month 3
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria =50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ACR50 was calculated as a =50% improvement from baseline in tender /painful and swollen joint counts and =50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. n=number of responders.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria =70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
ACR70 was calculated as a =70% improvement from baseline in tender /painful and swollen joint counts and =70% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. n=number of responders.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Greater Than or Equal to (=) 20% (ACR20): Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, and 6
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
ACR20 was calculated as a =20% improvement from baseline in tender /painful and swollen joint counts and =20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. n=number of responders.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score: Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, and 6
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a patient has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability. Overall score was computed as the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranged from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components: C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels: Month 3
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Month 3
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain: Month 3
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Month 3
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis: Month 3
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Participants answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very well) and 100 (very poorly).
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Month 3
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis: Month 3
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The blinded investigator or qualified assessor assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very good) and 100 (very poor).
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Month 3
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Swollen Joint Count: Month 3
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Swollen joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty six (66) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered swelling.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Month 3
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Tender/Painful Joint Count: Month 3
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Tender/painful joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty eight (68) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender or painful.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Month 3
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC): Week 2, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The PsARC covers 4 measures: Tender joint count, swollen joint count, the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, and the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The PsARC response is defined as improvement in 2 of 4 items, 1 of which must be joint pain or swelling, without worsening in any measure. Improvement criteria: =20% improvement in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis; =20% improvement in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis; =30% improvement in tender joint count; and =30% improvement in swollen joint count. n=number of responders.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Week 2, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO) Response: Months 1, 3, and 6
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The PGA-PsO is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are rated separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale, scored as 0=none; 1, 2, 3, or 4=most severe. The severity rating scores are summed and the average taken; the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA-PsO score on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Months 1, 3, and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response: Months 1, 3, and 6
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
PASI determines psoriasis severity based on lesion severity and percentage of body surface area (BSA) affected. Lesion severity is assessed for erythema, induration, and scaling evaluated separately for the head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs and then rated for each body area according to a 5 point scale: 0=no involvement; 1=slight; 2=moderate; 3=marked; 4=very marked. BSA involvement is the extent (%) of body area affected by psoriasis and is assigned a numerical score: 0=no involvement; 1=0% to 9%; 2=10% to 29%; 3=30% to 49%; 4=50% to 69%; 5=70% to 89%; 6=90% to 100%. In each area, the sum of the severity rating scores is multiplied by the score representing the percentage of this area involved by psoriasis, multiplied by a weighting factor (head 0.1; upper limbs 0.2; trunk 0.3; lower limbs 0.4). The sum of the numbers obtained for each of the 4 body areas is the PASI. PASI75 is defined as a 75% reduction from baseline in PASI. n=number of responders.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Months 1, 3, and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS): Months 1, 3, and 6
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The DSS is a function of finger circumference and tenderness, assessed and summed across all dactylitic digits. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0=tenderness and 3=extreme tenderness in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a participant is 0-60. Higher score indicates greater degree of tenderness. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Months 1, 3, and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index: Months 1, 3, and 6
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
The SPARCC Enthesitis Index identifies the presence or absence of tenderness at 16 enthesial sites, including the bilateral Achilles tendons, plantar fascia insertion at the calcaneus, patellar tendon insertion at the base of the patella, quadriceps insertion into the superior border of the patella, supraspinatus insertion into the greater tuberosity of the humerus, and medial and lateral epicondyles. On examination, tenderness is recorded as present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 16 sites, with an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Months 1, 3, and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI): Months 1, 3, and 6
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Enthesitis is inflammation in the tendon, ligament, and joint capsule fiber insertion into bone. The LEI assesses enthesitis in 6 sites. Tenderness is recorded as either present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 6 sites, for a total score of 0-6. Higher score indicates greater severity of enthesitis. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Months 1, 3, and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Physical Component Summary Score: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Normalized domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses. The component and domain scores were scored using the United States (US) 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. A higher PCS score represents better physical health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Mental Component Summary Score: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Normalized domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses. The component and domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. A higher MCS score represents better mental health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Physical Functioning Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure evaluating 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. The 10 items of the physical functioning scale represent levels & kinds of limitations between extremes of physical activities, including lifting & carrying groceries; climbing stairs; bending, kneeling, or stooping; walking moderate distances; self-care limitations. The physical functioning items capture the presence & extent of physical limitations using a 3-level response continuum. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher physical functioning domain score represents better physical functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Role-physical Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure evaluating 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. The 4-item role-physical scale covers an array of physical health-related role limitations, including: a) limitations in the kind of work or other usual activities; b) reductions in the amount of time spent on work or other usual activities; c) difficulty performing work or other usual activities; & d) accomplishing less. Items in the role-physical scale are answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher role-physical domain score represents better role-physical functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Bodily Pain Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The bodily pain scale comprises of 2 items pertaining to the intensity of bodily pain and extent of interference with normal work activities. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher bodily pain domain score represents less bodily pain. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): General Health Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The general health scale consists of 5 items including a rating of health and 4 items addressing the respondent's view and expectations of his or her health. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher general health domain score represents better general health perceptions. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Vitality Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 4-item measure of vitality captures a broad range of subjective evaluations of well-being from feelings of tiredness and being worn out to feeling full of energy all or most of the time. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher vitality domain score represents better vitality. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Social Functioning Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 2-item social functioning scale assesses health-related effects on quantity and quality of social activities. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher social functioning domain score represents better social functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Role-emotional Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 3-item role-emotional scale assesses mental health-related role limitations in terms of a) time spent in work or other usual activities; b) amount of work or activities accomplished; c) care with which work or other activities were performed. All 3 items are answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher role-emotional domain score represents better role-emotional functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Mental Health Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 5-item mental health scale includes 1 or more items from each of 4 major mental health dimensions: anxiety, depression, loss of behavioral/emotional control, and psychological well-being. All items are answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher mental health domain score represents better mental health functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Mobility: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Self-Care: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Usual Activities: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Pain/Discomfort: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Anxiety/Depression: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Patient's Health State Today: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [32]
0
0
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [32]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [33]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Total Score: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [33]
0
0
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better fatigue status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [33]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [34]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Experience Domain Score: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [34]
0
0
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue experience. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [34]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [35]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Impact Domain Score: Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [35]
0
0
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue impact on daily functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [35]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [36]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Score Evaluating Spondylitis Using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI): Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Assessment method [36]
0
0
BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with ankylosing spondylitis. Utilizing a VAS of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) participants answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain, and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averaged the individual assessments for a final score ranging 0-10cm, with higher scores representing more severe ankylosing spondylitis disease activity. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Query!
Timepoint [36]
0
0
Months 1, 3, 6
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Active arthritis at screening/baseline as indicated by >/= 3 tender/painful and 3
swollen joints
- Active plaque psoriasis at screening
- Inadequate efficacy or lack of toleration to previously administered TNF inhibitor
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Non-plaque forms of psoriasis (with exception of nail psoriasis)
- History of autoimmune rheumatic disease other than PsA; also prior history of or
current, rheumatic inflammatory disease other than PsA
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/08/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/04/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
395
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Rheumatology Department - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Rheumatology Research Unit - Maroochydore
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Emeritus Research Pty Ltd - Malvern East
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4558 - Maroochydore
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3145 - Malvern East
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Brussels
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Genk
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Merksem
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
MG
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
PR
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
RS
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
SP
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
São Paulo
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Uherske Hradiste
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Cedex
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Bobigny
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Bad Doberan
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Erlangen
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Frankfurt am Main
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Freiburg
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Homburg
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Koeln
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Olsberg
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
D.F
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Distrito Federal
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Jalisco
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Sinaloa
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Yucatan
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Chihuahua
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Elblag
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Grodzisk Mazowiecki
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Nadarzyn
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Karelia Republic
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Republic of Tatarstan, Russia
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Novosibirsk
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Tomsk
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Yaroslavl
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Martin
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
A Coruna
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Cantabria
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Taiwan Roc
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Chia-Yi
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Kaohsiung City
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Essex
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
West Midlands
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
West Yorkeshire
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Bath
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Bradford
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
York
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
Pfizer
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
To examine the safety and efficacy of tofacitinib in subjects with active psoriatic arthritis
who have previously had an inadequate response to at least one TNF inhibitor either due to
lack of efficacy or an adverse event.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01882439
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Query!
Address
0
0
Pfizer
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Summary Results
For IPD and results data, please see
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01882439
Download to PDF