Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02017717
Registration number
NCT02017717
Ethics application status
Date submitted
17/12/2013
Date registered
23/12/2013
Date last updated
16/07/2024
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Nivolumab Compared to Bevacizumab and of Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Glioblastoma Patients
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized Phase 3 Open Label Study of Nivolumab Versus Bevacizumab and Multiple Phase 1 Safety Cohorts of Nivolumab or Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Across Different Lines of Glioblastoma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2013-003738-34
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CA209-143
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
CheckMate 143
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Recurrent Glioblastoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Brain
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Other - Nivolumab
Treatment: Other - Bevacizumab
Treatment: Other - Ipilimumab
Experimental: Arm N:Nivolumab - Cohort 1, 1c, 1d and 2: Nivolumab specified dose on specified days
Experimental: Arm N + I:Nivolumab + Ipilimumab - Cohort 1: Nivolumab specified dose on specified days + Ipilimumab specified dose on specified days, then Nivolumab specified dose on specified days
Cohort 1b: Nivolumab specified dose on specified days + Ipilimumab specified dose on specified days, then Nivolumab specified dose on specified days
Active comparator: Arm B: Bevacizumab - Cohort 2: Bevacizumab specified dose on specified days
Treatment: Other: Nivolumab
specified dose on specified days
Treatment: Other: Bevacizumab
specified dose on specified days
Treatment: Other: Ipilimumab
specified dose on specified days
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four Doses
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The percentage of participants who experienced a drug-related adverse event leading to drug discontinuation by worst grade (grade 5 being the worst) prior to complete four-dose treatment. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Includes events reported between first dose and 30 days after last dose of study therapy (up to 3 doses, up to approximately 2 months)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The percentage of participants who experienced an adverse event by worst grade in each treatment arm. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The percentage of participants who experienced a serious adverse event by worst grade in each treatment arm. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The percentage of participants who experienced a laboratory abnormality of the liver in each treatment arm.
MedDRA Version: 24.1
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) Denominator corresponds to participants with at least on one treatment measurement of the corresponding laboratory parameter. Includes laboratory results reported after the first dose and within 30 days of last dose of study therapy.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The percentage of participants who experienced a laboratory abnormality of the thyroid in each treatment arm.
MedDRA Version: 24.1
Free T3 (FT3) Free T4 (FT4) Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)
(A) Within a 2-week window after the abnormal TSH test date. (B) Includes participants with TSH abnormality and with no FT3/FT4 test values in the 2-week window or with non-abnormal value(s) from only one of the two tests and no value from the other test.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).
Query!
Primary outcome [6]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) for Cohort 2
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
OS was measured in months from the time of randomization to the event date (death) due to any cause. A participant who has not died will be censored at the last known alive date.
Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazard model stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS. P-value from log-rank test stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause (up to 17Jun2019, approximately 5 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months for Cohort 2
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
OS(12) is measured as the percentage of participants alive at 12 months per Kaplan-Meier curve of OS. Z test with variance estimation based on Greenwood formula using log(-log) transformation.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization to 12 months following randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) for Cohorts 1c and 1d
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
OS was measured in months from the time of randomization (Part B) or time of treatment (Part A) to the event date (death) due to any cause. A participant who has not died will be censored at the last known alive date.
Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause (up to 17Jun2019, approximately 5 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Progression Free Survival (PFS) for Cohort 2
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
PFS was measured in months from the time of randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazard model stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to 17Jun2019, approximately 5 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Cohort 2
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
ORR was measured by the percentage of participants whose best overall response (BOR) is confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) divided by response evaluable participants. The best overall response (BOR) is determined once all the data for the participant is known. BOR is defined as the best response designation, as determined by investigators, recorded between the date of randomization and the date of objectively documented progression per RANO criteria, the date of subsequent therapy, or date of surgical resection, whichever occurs first.
Confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method. For the comparison of the odds ratio of Nivolumab over Bevacizumab, the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method of weighting was utilized.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to approximately 31 months)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Participants with histologically confirmed Grade IV malignant glioma
* Previous treatment with radiotherapy and temozolomide (Cohorts 1, 1b and 2 only)
* First recurrence of GBM (Cohorts 1, 1b and 2 only)
* First diagnosis of GBM with resectable disease (Cohorts 1c Part A only)
* First diagnosis of unmethylated MGMT GBM (Cohort 1d and Cohort 1c Part B only)
* Karnofsky performance score of 70 or higher
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* More than 1 recurrence of GBM (Cohorts 1, 1b and 2 only)
* Any recurrence of GBM (Cohorts 1c and 1d only)
* Presence of extracranial metastatic or leptomeningeal disease
* Active, known or suspected autoimmune disease
* Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
* Prior bevacizumab or other Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) or anti-angiogenic treatment (Cohort 2 only)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
7/02/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
21/06/2024
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
529
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Local Institution - 0035 - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Local Institution - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Local Institution - 0034 - East Bentleigh
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Local Institution - East Bentleigh
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Local Institution - 0033 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Local Institution - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Local Institution - 0032 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Local Institution - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2170 - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
3165 - East Bentleigh
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Brussels
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Aarhus C
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Odense C
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Bron cedex
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Marseille Cedex 5
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Paris cedex 13
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Bonn
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Frankfurt Am Main
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Heidelberg
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Muenster
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Bologna
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Siena
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Torino
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Groningen
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Pamplona
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Lausanne
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Zuerich
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Greater London
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Greater Manchester
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Liverpool
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab administered alone versus bevacizumab in patients diagnosed with recurrent glioblastoma (a type of brain cancer, also known as GBM), and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of nivolumab administered alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with different lines of GBM therapy.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02017717
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Woroniecka K, Fecci PE. Immuno-synergy? Neoantigen vaccines and checkpoint blockade in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):1233-1234. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa170. No abstract available. Reardon DA, Brandes AA, Omuro A, Mulholland P, Lim M, Wick A, Baehring J, Ahluwalia MS, Roth P, Bahr O, Phuphanich S, Sepulveda JM, De Souza P, Sahebjam S, Carleton M, Tatsuoka K, Taitt C, Zwirtes R, Sampson J, Weller M. Effect of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: The CheckMate 143 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;6(7):1003-1010. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1024. Stupp R. Drug development for glioma: are we repeating the same mistakes? Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):10-12. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30827-1. Epub 2018 Dec 3. No abstract available.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Query!
Address
0
0
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/17/NCT02017717/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/17/NCT02017717/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02017717
Download to PDF