The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02130024




Registration number
NCT02130024
Ethics application status
Date submitted
27/03/2014
Date registered
2/05/2014

Titles & IDs
Public title
A Comparison of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept for the Development of Geographic Atrophy in (Wet) AMD Patients
Scientific title
Development of New Geographic Atrophy in Patients With Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration: a Comparison of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
CRFB002AAU17
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
RIVAL
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Age-Related Macular Degeneration 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Eye 0 0 0 0
Diseases / disorders of the eye
Other 0 0 0 0
Research that is not of generic health relevance and not applicable to specific health categories listed above

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Treatment: Drugs - Aflibercept 2.0 mg

Experimental: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg - 3 monthly loading doses (Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8), followed by an individualised treatment and evaluation regimen according to disease activity \[treat and extend\]

Active comparator: Aflibercept 2.0 mg - 3 monthly loading doses (Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8), followed by an individualised treatment and evaluation regimen according to disease activity \[treat and extend\]


Treatment: Drugs: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Administered as an intravitreal injection

Treatment: Drugs: Aflibercept 2.0 mg
Administered as an intravitreal injection

Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Mean Change in Square-root Area of Geographic Atrophy (GA) From Baseline to Month 24
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Baseline, Month 24
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Mean Change in Square-root Area of Geographic Atrophy From Baseline to Month 12
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Baseline, Month 12
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Percentage of Patients With Newly Developed Geographic Atrophy During the Overall 24 Months of the Study
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Mean Number of Intravitreal Injections From Baseline to Month 12 and to Month 24
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12 and to Month 24
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Mean Change in Central Subfield Foveal Thickness (CSFT) From Baseline to Month 12 and to Month 24
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Percentage of Patients Showing no Intraretinal Fluid (IRF)/Subretinal Fluid (SRF)
Timepoint [6] 0 0
Month 2, Month 12, Month 24
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
Percentage of Patients Showing Greater Than and Equal to 15 Letters Gain for BCVA From Baseline to Month 12 and to Month 24
Timepoint [7] 0 0
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
Percentage of Patients Showing Less Than and Equal to 15 Letters Loss for BCVA From Baseline to Month 12 and to Month 24
Timepoint [8] 0 0
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
Mean Number of Times a Patient Needed to Return to Monthly Intravitreal Injections Over 24 Months
Timepoint [9] 0 0
Month 24
Secondary outcome [10] 0 0
Mean Change in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Plasma Concentration From Baseline to 7 Days After the Second and 7 Days After the Third Mandated Intravitreal Injection of Treatment
Timepoint [10] 0 0
Baseline, Week 5, Week 9
Secondary outcome [11] 0 0
Percentage of Patients With Change in Retinal Nerve Fibre Thickness From Baseline to Month 12 and Month 24
Timepoint [11] 0 0
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Secondary outcome [12] 0 0
Percentage of Patients With Ocular Inflammation at Baseline and 7 Days Post-injection Following 3rd Mandated Intravitreal Injection - Anterior Chamber Cells
Timepoint [12] 0 0
Baseline, Week 9
Secondary outcome [13] 0 0
Percentage of Patients With Ocular Inflammation at Baseline and 7 Days Post-injection Following 3rd Mandated Intravitreal Injection - Anterior Chamber Flare
Timepoint [13] 0 0
Baseline, Week 9

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:

- Written informed consent.

Inclusion criteria specific to the study eye:

* Diagnosis of active subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to wet Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD);
* Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) score of 23 letters or more as measured by 3-metre Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts.
Minimum age
50 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria:

* Pregnant, nursing, or at risk of becoming pregnant during the study;
* Inability to comply with the study or follow-up procedures;
* Recent (3 months) stroke or myocardial infarction; uncontrolled hypertension; hypersensitivity to the study treatments or to fluorescein;
* In either eye: active periocular or ocular infection or inflammation; iris neovascularisation; uncontrolled or neovascular glaucoma; or one or more patch of geographic atrophy (GA) as specified in the protocol.

Exclusion criteria specific to the study eye:

* Prior or current treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs or corticosteroids;
* Other eye conditions as specified in the protocol;
* Any intraocular procedure carried out within 2 months before baseline or anticipated within 6 months following baseline.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s


Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 4
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,TAS,VIC,WA
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Albury
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Brookvale
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Chatswood
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Hurtsville
Recruitment hospital [5] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Mona Vale
Recruitment hospital [6] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Parramatta
Recruitment hospital [7] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Strathfield
Recruitment hospital [8] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Sydney
Recruitment hospital [9] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Westmead
Recruitment hospital [10] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Caboolture
Recruitment hospital [11] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Redcliffe
Recruitment hospital [12] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - South Brisbane
Recruitment hospital [13] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Southport
Recruitment hospital [14] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Adelaide
Recruitment hospital [15] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - South Launceston
Recruitment hospital [16] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Clayton
Recruitment hospital [17] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Malvern
Recruitment hospital [18] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Parkville,
Recruitment hospital [19] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Nedlands
Recruitment hospital [20] 0 0
Novartis Investigative Site - Subiaco
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2640 - Albury
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
2100 - Brookvale
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
2067 - Chatswood
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
2220 - Hurtsville
Recruitment postcode(s) [5] 0 0
- Mona Vale
Recruitment postcode(s) [6] 0 0
2150 - Parramatta
Recruitment postcode(s) [7] 0 0
2035 - Strathfield
Recruitment postcode(s) [8] 0 0
2135 - Strathfield
Recruitment postcode(s) [9] 0 0
2000 - Sydney
Recruitment postcode(s) [10] 0 0
AUSTRALIA - Sydney
Recruitment postcode(s) [11] 0 0
2145 - Westmead
Recruitment postcode(s) [12] 0 0
4510 - Caboolture
Recruitment postcode(s) [13] 0 0
4020 - Redcliffe
Recruitment postcode(s) [14] 0 0
4101 - South Brisbane
Recruitment postcode(s) [15] 0 0
4215 - Southport
Recruitment postcode(s) [16] 0 0
5000 - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [17] 0 0
7249 - South Launceston
Recruitment postcode(s) [18] 0 0
3168 - Clayton
Recruitment postcode(s) [19] 0 0
3144 - Malvern
Recruitment postcode(s) [20] 0 0
3065 - Parkville,
Recruitment postcode(s) [21] 0 0
6009 - Nedlands
Recruitment postcode(s) [22] 0 0
6008 - Subiaco

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Address 0 0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment


What supporting documents are/will be available?

Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.