Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02100696
Registration number
NCT02100696
Ethics application status
Date submitted
27/03/2014
Date registered
1/04/2014
Date last updated
13/08/2021
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Etrolizumab in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis Who Have Been Previously Exposed to Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibitors
Query!
Scientific title
Phase III, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Etrolizumab During Induction and Maintenance in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis Who Have Been Previously Exposed to TNF Inhibitors
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2013-004278-88
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
GA28950
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
HICKORY
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Ulcerative Colitis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Oral and Gastrointestinal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Inflammatory bowel disease
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Etrozulimab
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Experimental: Cohort 1: Etrolizumab (Open-Label Induction (OLI) Phase) - Participants assigned to this arm will receive treatment with open-label etrolizumab 105 milligrams (mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 14 weeks during the induction phase.
Placebo comparator: Cohort 2: Placebo (Double-Blind Induction Phase) - Participants randomized to this arm will receive treatment with double-blind placebo SC injection Q4W for 14 weeks during the induction phase.
Experimental: Cohort 2: Etrolizumab (Double-Blind Induction Phase) - Participants randomized to this arm will receive treatment with double-blind etrolizumab 105 mg SC injection Q4W for 14 weeks during the induction phase.
Placebo comparator: Placebo Responders: Placebo (Maintenance Phase) - Participants who received placebo during the induction phase, Cohort 2: Placebo (Double-Blind Induction Phase), and achieve a clinical response with placebo at Week 14 will continue to receive blinded placebo from Week 16 up to Week 66 during the maintenance phase.
Placebo comparator: Etrolizumab Responders: Placebo (Maintenance Phase) - Participants who received etrolizumab during the induction phase, Cohort 1: Etrolizumab (Open-Label Induction Phase) and Cohort 2: Etrolizumab (Double-Blind Induction Phase), and achieved a clinical response at Week 14 will be re-randomized by Week 16 for the double-blind maintenance phase. Clinical responders re-randomized to this arm will receive placebo SC injection Q4W from Week 16 up to Week 66.
Experimental: Etrolizumab Responders: Etrolizumab (Maintenance Phase) - Participants who received etrolizumab during the induction phase, Cohort 1: Etrolizumab (Open-Label Induction Phase) and Cohort 2: Etrolizumab (Double-Blind Induction Phase), and achieved a clinical response at Week 14 will be re-randomized by Week 16 for the double-blind maintenance phase. Clinical responders re-randomized to this arm will receive etrolizumab 105 mg SC injection Q4W from Week 16 up to Week 66.
Treatment: Drugs: Etrozulimab
Participants will receive 105 mg etrolizumab administered by SC injection Q4W.
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Participants will receive placebo (matched with etrolizumab) administered by SC injection Q4W.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (=)2 with individual subscores =1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 14
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Had Achieved a Clinical Response at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (=)2 with individual subscores =1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Clinical Response is MCS with =3-point decrease and 30% reduction from baseline as well as =1-point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Clinical Remission is MCS =2 with individual subscores =1.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (=)2 with individual subscores =1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Clinical Response is MCS with =3-point decrease and 30% reduction from baseline as well as =1-point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Endoscopic Appearance of the Mucosa at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Improvement in endoscopic appearance of the mucosa is Endoscopy subscore =1.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Endoscopic Remission is Endoscopy subscore = 0.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Histologic Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the Nancy Histological Index
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Nancy Histological Index (NHI) is a 5-level classification ranging from grade 0 (No histologically significant disease) to grade 4 (severely active disease). Histologic remission is defined as a Nancy Histological Index of 0 or 1.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MCS Rectal Bleed Subscore
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Rectal bleeding data were collected via the participant's diaries and each day a participant provided a score from 0 to 3 according to the following definitions: 0 = no blood in the stool; 1 = streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2 = obvious blood with stool most of the time; 3 = blood alone passed. The Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) rectal bleeding subscore was calculated as the worst value of three days of daily diary scores closest to anchor dates at baseline and post-baseline. The data was considered non-parametric and was reported using RANK analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Participants were stratified by concomitant treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressants at randomization and disease activity measured during screening (MCS =9/MCS =10); the model adjusted for these stratification factors along with the baseline rectal bleeding (RB) subscore.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline and Week 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MCS Stool Frequency Subscore
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Stool frequency data were collected via the participant's diaries and each day a participant provided a score from 0 to 3 according to the following definitions: 0 = normal number of stools; 1 = 1 to 2 more stools than normal; 2 = 3 to 4 more stools than normal; 3 = 5 or more stools than normal. The Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) stool frequency subscore was calculated as the average of three days daily diary scores closest to anchor dates at baseline and post-baseline. The data was considered non-parametric and was reported using RANK analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Participants were stratified by concomitant treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressants at randomization and disease activity measured during screening (MCS =9/MCS =10); the model adjusted for these stratification factors along with the baseline stool frequency (SF) subscore.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline and Week 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 14 in UC Bowel Movement Signs and Symptoms, as Assessed by the Ulcerative Colitis Patient-Reported Outcome Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS) Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The UC-PRO questionnaire is collected in the e-diary and completed by participants for at least 9-12 consecutive days prior to a study visit. The UC-PRO is being reported in three domains; two domains are key endpoints and reported as UC-PRO Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS). The bowel domain score ranges from 0-27, with a higher score indicating a worse disease state.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 14 in UC Functional Symptoms, as Assessed by the UC-PRO/SS Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The UC-PRO questionnaire is collected in the e-diary and completed by participants for at least 9-12 consecutive days prior to a study visit. The UC-PRO is being reported in three domains; two domains are key endpoints and reported as UC-PRO Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS). The functional (abdominal symptoms) domain score ranges from 0-12, with a higher score indicating a worse disease state.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 14 in Health-Related Quality of Life, as Assessed by the Overall Score of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The IBDQ score is a Total Score summed up from across all 32 questions on the questionnaire. The Total Score range is from 32 to 224 with higher scores representing a better quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Had Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (=)2 with individual subscores =1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Clinical Remission is MCS =2 with individual subscores =1.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 66, as Determined by the MCS
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (=)2 with individual subscores =1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Clinical Remission is MCS =2 with individual subscores =1.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Had Achieved Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (=)2 with individual subscores =1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Endoscopic Appearance of the Mucosa at Week 66, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Improvement in endoscopic appearance of the mucosa is Endoscopy subscore =1.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline and Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Histologic Remission at Week 66, as Determined by the Nancy Histological Index
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Nancy Histological Index (NHI) is a 5-level classification ranging from grade 0 (No histologically significant disease) to grade 4 (severely active disease). Histologic remission is defined as a Nancy Histological Index of 0 or 1.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 66, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Endoscopic Remission is Endoscopy subscore = 0.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Were Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline, as Determined by the MCS
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Corticosteroid-Free analysis was conducted only on a subgroup of participants who were randomized into the maintenance phase and receiving Corticosteroids (CS) at baseline. Participants were defined as being off CS if they had no record of taking CS on the date that was 24 weeks prior to Week 66.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid-Free Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Were Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline, as Determined by the MCS
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Corticosteroid-Free analysis was conducted only on a subgroup of participants who were randomized into the maintenance phase and receiving Corticosteroids (CS) at baseline. Participants were defined as being off CS if they had no record of taking CS on the date that was 24 weeks prior to Week 66.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 66 in UC Bowel Movement Signs and Symptoms, as Assessed by the UC-PRO/SS Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
The UC-PRO questionnaire is collected in the e-diary and completed by participants for at least 9-12 consecutive days prior to a study visit. The UC-PRO is being reported in three domains; two domains are key endpoints and reported as UC-PRO Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS). The bowel domain score ranges from 0-27, with a higher score indicating a worse disease state.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline and Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 66 in UC Functional Symptoms, as Assessed by the UC-PRO/SS Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
The UC-PRO questionnaire is collected in the e-diary and completed by participants for at least 9-12 consecutive days prior to a study visit. The UC-PRO is being reported in three domains; two domains are key endpoints and reported as UC-PRO Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS). The functional (abdominal symptoms) domain score ranges from 0-12, with a higher score indicating a worse disease state.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline and Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 66 in Health-Related Quality of Life, as Assessed by the Overall Score of the IBDQ
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
The IBDQ is used to assess participant's health-related quality of life (QOL). The IBDQ score is a Total Score summed up from across all 32 questions on the questionnaire. The Total Score range is from 32 to 224 with higher scores representing a better quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline and Week 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event by Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
All Adverse Events (AEs) were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Any AE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to AE. Not all grades are appropriate for all AEs; some AEs have fewer than 5 options. The terms "severe" and "serious" are not synonymous and are independently assessed for each AE. Multiple occurrences of AEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
From Baseline up to Week 78
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
From Baseline up to Week 78
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Number of Participants With Serious Infection-Related Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
From Baseline up to Week 78
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Number of Participants With Infection-Related Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
All Adverse Events (AEs) were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Any AE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Not all grades are appropriate for all AEs; some AEs have fewer than 5 options. The terms "severe" and "serious" are not synonymous and are independently assessed for each AE. Multiple occurrences of AEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
From Baseline up to Week 78
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reaction-Related Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
From Baseline up to Week 78
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Number of Participants With Hypersensitivity Reaction-Related Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
From Baseline up to Week 78
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Number of Participants With Malignancies
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
From Baseline up to Week 78
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies to Etrolizumab at Baseline and During the Study
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
A tiered strategy was used to detect and characterize etrolizumab antibodies within this clinical study. When determining post baseline incidence, participants were considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following etrolizumab drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer unit greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be ADA negative if they were ADA negative or had missing data at baseline and all post baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA positive at baseline but did not have any post baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer unit greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
Pre-dose at Baseline, Weeks 4, 14, 24, 44, and 66, and Early Termination/End of Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 78)
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Etrolizumab Serum Trough Concentration (for Arms/Timepoints Above LLOQ)
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
As per Protocol, the timepoints for each arm where more than a third of the samples were above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), full summary statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation) were reported. For timepoints below the LLOQ, only the Median and Max were reported as a separate outcome measure below.
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
Pre-dose (0 hour) at Baseline and Weeks 14, 24, 44 and 66
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Etrolizumab Serum Trough Concentration (for Arms/Timepoints Below LLOQ)
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
As per Protocol, the timepoints for each arm where more than a third of the samples were below the LLOQ only the Median and Max were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
Weeks 44 and 66
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of UC established at least 3 months prior to Day 1
* Moderately to severely active UC as determined by the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) assessment
* Treatment within 5 years prior to screening with one or two induction regimens that contain TNF inhibitors (including TNF inhibitor biosimilars)
* Washout of anti-TNF therapy for at least 8 weeks preceding Day 1
* Background regimen for UC may include oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), oral corticosteroids, budesonide, probiotics, azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), or methotrexate (MTX) if doses have been stable during the screening period
* Use of highly effective contraception as defined by the protocol
* Must have received a colonoscopy within the past year or be willing to undergo a colonoscopy in lieu of a flexible sigmoidoscopy at screening
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* A history of or current conditions and diseases affecting the digestive tract, such as indeterminate colitis, suspicion of ischemic colitis, radiation colitis, or microscopic colitis, Crohn's disease, fistulas or abdominal abscesses, colonic mucosal dysplasia, intestinal obstruction, toxic megacolon, or unremoved adenomatous colonic polyps
* Prior or planned surgery for UC
* Past or present ileostomy or colostomy
* Any prior treatment with etrolizumab or other anti-integrin agents (including natalizumab, vedolizumab, and efalizumab)
* Any prior treatment with anti-adhesion molecules (e.g. anti-MAdCAM-1)
* Any prior treatment with rituximab
* Any treatment with tofacitinib during screening
* Congenital or acquired immune deficiency, chronic hepatitis B or C infection, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, or history of tuberculosis (active or latent)
* Evidence of or treatment for Clostridium difficile or clinically significant cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis within 60 days prior to Day 1
* Evidence of or treatment for other intestinal pathogens within 30 days prior to Day 1
* History of recurrent opportunistic infections and/or severe disseminated viral infections
* History of organ transplant
* Any major episode of infection requiring treatment with intravenous (IV) antibiotics within 8 weeks prior to screening or oral antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to screening
* Received a live attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to Day 1
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
21/05/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
16/04/2020
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
609
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD,TAS,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital - Herston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Mater Adult Hospital - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Launceston General Hospital; Gastroenterology Research - Launceston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Footscray Hospital; Gastroenterology - Footscray
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
St Frances Xavier Cabrini Hospital - Malvern
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Fiona Stanley Hospital - Murdoch
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
4029 - Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4101 - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
7250 - Launceston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
3065 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
3011 - Footscray
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
3144 - Malvern
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
6150 - Murdoch
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Rosario
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Klagenfurt
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Salzburg
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Wien
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Bonheiden
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Brussels
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Brussel
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Herentals
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Liège
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Roeselare
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
GO
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
MG
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
PR
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
RJ
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
RS
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
SP
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Nova Scotia
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Hradec Kralove
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Pardubice
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Prague
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Praha 7
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Usti Nad Labem
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
København Ø
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Ålborg
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Amiens Cedex01
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Clichy cedex
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Lille
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Marseille cedex 20
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Nice
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Pessac
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Saint Etienne
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Strasbourg
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Toulouse Cedex 09
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Vandoeuvre-les-nancy
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Erlangen
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Frankfurt
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Freiburg
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Halle
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Hannover
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Kiel
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Mannheim
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Muenster
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Ulm
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Thessaloniki
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Bekescsaba
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Eger
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Gyor
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Miskolc
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Pecs
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Székesfehérvár
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Jerusalem
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Petach Tiqwa
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Rehovot
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Rishon Lezion
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Emilia-Romagna
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Lazio
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Lombardia
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Toscana
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Veneto
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Daegu
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Gyeonggi-do
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Seongnam-si
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Suwon-si,
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Kaunas
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Vilnius
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Nuevo LEON
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Arnhem
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
NL -nijmegen
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Bydgoszcz
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Katowice
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Rzeszów
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Szczecin
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Bucuresti
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Girona
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Zaragoza
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Bern
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Cambridge
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Exeter
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Country [118]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [118]
0
0
Newcastle upon Tyne
Query!
Country [119]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [119]
0
0
Nottingham
Query!
Country [120]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [120]
0
0
Southampton
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study will investigate the efficacy and safety of etrolizumab during induction and maintenance of remission compared with placebo in the treatment of participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) who have been previously exposed to TNF inhibitors.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02100696
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Peyrin-Biroulet L, Hart A, Bossuyt P, Long M, Allez M, Juillerat P, Armuzzi A, Loftus EV Jr, Ostad-Saffari E, Scalori A, Oh YS, Tole S, Chai A, Pulley J, Lacey S, Sandborn WJ; HICKORY Study Group. Etrolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis in patients previously treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (HICKORY): a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;7(2):128-140. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00298-3. Epub 2021 Nov 17. Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S, Tyrrell H, Hassanali A, Lacey S, Tole S, Tatro AR; Etrolizumab Global Steering Committee. Etrolizumab for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: An Overview of the Phase 3 Clinical Program. Adv Ther. 2020 Jul;37(7):3417-3431. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01366-2. Epub 2020 May 22.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Clinical Trials
Query!
Address
0
0
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/96/NCT02100696/Prot_002.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/96/NCT02100696/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02100696
Download to PDF