Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02167672
Registration number
NCT02167672
Ethics application status
Date submitted
16/04/2014
Date registered
19/06/2014
Date last updated
20/03/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
Barriers for the Uptake of LaparoScopic Hysterectomy
Query!
Scientific title
What Would it Take to Reduce the Proportion of Women Who Have a Hysterectomy Via an Open Abdominal Approach in Australia?
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
LIgHT
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
LIgHT
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Hysterectomy
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Consumers - Women who have had a Hysterectomy in the previous 2 years
Doctors - Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Questionnaire will identify barriers
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
12 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Obstetricians and Gynaecologists or Women who have had a hysterectomy in the previous
2 years
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Women who have had a hysterectomy more than 2 years ago
- Women who had a hysterectomy for cancerous conditions
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Query!
Duration
Query!
Selection
Query!
Timing
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/04/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/12/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
1200
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
University of Queensland - Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
4029 - Brisbane
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Queensland University of Technology
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Hysterectomy (surgical removal of the uterus) is the most common major gynaecological
operation in women in developed countries. In Queensland, 6000 women require a hysterectomy
for irregular periods, benign tumours or pelvic pain every year. Surgical approaches to
surgical removal of the uterus (womb) include Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (LH), Vaginal
Hysterectomy (VH) and Abdominal Hysterectomy through an abdominal incision (AH).
It is widely accepted that LH and VH are less invasive surgical procedures, cause less
bleeding, surgical complications and pain and are associated with quicker recovery from
surgery than the more invasive AH. In a clinical trial comparing LH and AH we recently
demonstrated that LH outperforms AH with regards to cost effectiveness causing less total
health-services cost than AH.
Implementation of LH in Queensland could save $9.8 million every year. Despite the evidence
for LH and VH, 2600 hysterectomies (43%) are still performed through an open, abdominal
incision. In brief, a common but outdated operation is still performed regularly causing not
only unnecessary pain, surgical adverse events and longer hospital stay but also increased
healthcare costs.
This study will assess reasons why a significant number of gynaecologists and patients prefer
AH over LH (Barriers to the uptake of laparoscopic hysterectomy). We will survey specialist
gynaecologists as well as patients who have had a hysterectomy for different health reasons.
Based on the information from the survey the investigators will develop an intervention to
increase the rate of laparoscopic hysterectomies in Queensland and pilot test it.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02167672
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Andreas Obermair
Query!
Address
0
0
Queensland Health
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Summary Results
For IPD and results data, please see
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02167672
Download to PDF