Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02207231
Registration number
NCT02207231
Ethics application status
Date submitted
31/07/2014
Date registered
4/08/2014
Date last updated
23/07/2021
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis
Query!
Scientific title
Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active Comparator-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
CNTO1959PSO3001
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CR105047
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
VOYAGE 1
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Psoriasis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Dermatological conditions
Query!
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other skin conditions
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Guselkumab 100 mg
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo for guselkumab
Treatment: Drugs - Adalimumab
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo for adalimumab
Experimental: Group I - Participants received Guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) at Weeks 0, 4, and 12 and every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter through Week 252, placebo for guselkumab at Week 16, and placebo for adalimumab (two 0.8 milliliter \[mL\] injections) at Week 0 followed by one 0.8 mL injection at Weeks 1, 3, and 5, and every 2 weeks (q2w) thereafter through Week 47.
Placebo comparator: Group II - Participants received Placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 0, 4, and 12, and placebo for adalimumab (two 0.8 mL injections) at Week 0, followed by one 0.8 mL injection at Weeks 1, 3, and 5, and q2w through Week 15. At Week 16, placebo participants will cross over to receive guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16 and 20 and q8w thereafter through Week 252, as well as placebo for adalimumab at Weeks 17, 19, 21, and 23, and q2w thereafter through Week 47.
Active comparator: Group III - Participants received Adalimumab 80 mg at Week 0 (two 40 mg \[0.8 mL\] injections) and 40 mg at Weeks 1, 3, 5, and q2w thereafter through Week 47, placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 16, and 20, and q8w thereafter through Week 44 and guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 52, 60, and q8w thereafter through Week 252.
Treatment: Drugs: Guselkumab 100 mg
100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 4 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group 1). 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 16, 20 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group II). 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Week 52 and q8w thereafter through Week 252 (Group III).
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo for guselkumab
Subcutaneous injections to maintain the blind.
Treatment: Drugs: Adalimumab
80 mg by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, then 40 mg at Week 1 and every 2 weeks (q2w) thereafter through Week 47.
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo for adalimumab
Subcutaneous injections to maintain the blind.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 16
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 24 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Week 24 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Week 24 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 16 in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants. This secondary outcome measure was planned to include only the placebo and guselkumab arms.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 75 response represents participants who achieved at least a 75 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Scalp-specific Investigator's Global Assessment (Ss-IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness, which are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = absence of disease, 1 = very mild disease, 2 = mild disease, 3 = moderate disease, and 4 = severe disease. This secondary outcome measure was planned to include only the placebo and guselkumab arms.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score at Week 16 in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The PSSD (24-hour version) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed and validated to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. It consisted of 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score and sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that Symptom \[or Sign\] score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe and higher score indicates more severe disease. This secondary outcome measure was planned to include only the placebo and guselkumab arms.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline and Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The PSSD (24-hour version) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed and validated to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. It consisted of 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score and sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that Symptom \[or Sign\] score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe and higher score indicates more severe disease.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 90 Response at Week 252
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score. As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Week 252
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 252
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 75 response represents participants who achieved at least a 75 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score. As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Week 252
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 252
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Week 252
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 252
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants. As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Week 252
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 252
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
The PSSD (24-hour version) is a PRO questionnaire designed and validated to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. It consisted of 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score and sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that Symptom score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe and higher score indicates more severe disease. As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Week 252
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 252
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
The PSSD (24-hour version) is a PRO questionnaire designed and validated to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. It consisted of 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score and sign score when at least 3 items (\>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value is converted into 0-100 scoring, such that Sign score = average value\*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe and higher score indicates more severe disease. As per planned analysis, participants from the baseline guselkumab group and the placebo crossover group were combined into a single guselkumab group for assessment of this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Week 252
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis (with or without psoriatic arthritis) at least 6 months before the first administration of study agent
* Have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to (>=) 12 at Screening and at Baseline
* Have an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score >=3 at Screening and at Baseline
* Have an involved body surface area (BSA) >=10 percent (%) at Screening and at Baseline
* Must be a candidate for either systemic therapy or phototherapy for psoriasis
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
99
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Participants with nonplaque forms of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular) or with current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
* Participants who have ever received guselkumab or adalimumab
* History or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
* Has any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not be in the best interest (for example, compromise the well-being) of the participant or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments
* Is pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy (both men and women) within 5 months following the last administration of study drug
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
26/11/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
17/06/2020
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
837
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
- East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
- Hectorville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
- Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
- Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
- Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
- Woden
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
- Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Hectorville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
- Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
- Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
- Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
- Woden
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
- Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Rhode Island
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Newfoundland and Labrador
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Nova Scotia
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Bonn
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Essen
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Frankfurt/ Main
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Gera
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Kiel
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Lubeck
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Mahlow
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Munster
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Tübingen
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Kaposvar
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Kecskemet
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Pecs
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Szeged
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Bundang
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Busan
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Daejeon
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Suwon
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Bydgoszcz
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Olsztyn
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Ekaterinburg
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Kirov
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Krasnodar
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Lipetsk
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Rostov-on-Don
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Ryazan
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
St. Petersburg
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Stavropol
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Ulyanovsk
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Baracaldo
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Manises
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Palma de Mallorca
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Salamanca
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
San Sebastian de los Reyes
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Kaohsiung
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Taichung City
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Tainan
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Taipei City
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Taoyuan
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of guselkumab (CNTO 1959) in the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02207231
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Reich K, Gordon KB, Strober BE, Armstrong AW, Miller M, Shen YK, You Y, Han C, Yang YW, Foley P, Griffiths CEM. Five-year maintenance of clinical response and health-related quality of life improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab: results from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. Br J Dermatol. 2021 Dec;185(6):1146-1159. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20568. Epub 2021 Sep 8. Armstrong AW, Reich K, Foley P, Han C, Song M, Shen YK, You Y, Papp KA. Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes (Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary) with Guselkumab in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results from the Phase III VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019 Feb;20(1):155-164. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0396-z. Foley P, Gordon K, Griffiths CEM, Wasfi Y, Randazzo B, Song M, Li S, Shen YK, Blauvelt A. Efficacy of Guselkumab Compared With Adalimumab and Placebo for Psoriasis in Specific Body Regions: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Jun 1;154(6):676-683. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.0793.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Query!
Address
0
0
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02207231
Download to PDF