Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02391116
Registration number
NCT02391116
Ethics application status
Date submitted
16/02/2015
Date registered
18/03/2015
Date last updated
4/01/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
Phase II Copanlisib in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
Query!
Scientific title
An Open-label, Single-arm Phase II Study in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Single Agent Copanlisib and the Impact of Biomarkers Thereupon.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2014-004848-36
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
17119
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Diffuse, Large B-Cell, Lymphoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - High grade lymphoma
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - Low grade lymphoma
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Copanlisib (Aliqopa, BAY80-6946)
Experimental: Copanlisib (Aliqopa, BAY80-6946) - Copanlisib (Aliqopa, BAY80-6946) solution for IV infusion (test drug/investigational medicinal product)
Treatment: Drugs: Copanlisib (Aliqopa, BAY80-6946)
Participants assigned to receive copanlisib intravenous (IV) infusion at a dose of 60 mg as single agent on Days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day treatment cycle. Copanlisib treatment was to be continued until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or until another criterion was met for withdrawal from the study treatment
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Total Population Based on Investigator Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants who had at least one post-baseline overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) during study conduct according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT. The primary efficacy overall response assessment was based on investigator assessment of response.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 24 weeks after the last participant fully evaluable for the primary endpoint started treatment (about 12 months)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
ORR by CD79b Status Based on Investigator Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants who had at least one post-baseline overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) during study conduct according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT. The primary efficacy overall response assessment was based on investigator assessment of response.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 24 weeks after the last participant fully evaluable for the primary endpoint started treatment (about 12 months)
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
ORR by DLBCL/COO Subtype Based on Investigator Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants who had at least one post-baseline overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) during study conduct according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT. The primary efficacy overall response assessment was based on investigator assessment of response.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 24 weeks after the last participant fully evaluable for the primary endpoint started treatment (about 12 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Duration of Response (DOR) in Total Population
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The duration of response (DOR) was defined as the time from the date of first observed overall response (CR or PR) until radiological PD or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier. DOR was defined for responders only (i.e. participants with a best response of CR or PR), based on the investigator assessment of tumor response according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
DOR by CD79b Status
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The duration of response (DOR) was defined as the time from the date of first observed overall response (CR or PR) until radiological PD or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier. DOR was defined for responders only (i.e. participants with a best response of CR or PR), based on the investigator assessment of tumor response according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
DOR by DLBCL/COO Subtype
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The duration of response (DOR) was defined as the time from the date of first observed overall response (CR or PR) until radiological PD or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier. DOR was defined for responders only (i.e. participants with a best response of CR or PR), based on the investigator assessment of tumor response according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Total Population
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of start of study treatment to radiological PD or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier, based on the investigator assessment of tumor response according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
PFS by CD79b Status
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of start of study treatment to radiological PD or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier, based on the investigator assessment of tumor response according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
PFS by DLBCL/COO Subtype
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of start of study treatment to radiological PD or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier, based on the investigator assessment of tumor response according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) in Total Population
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of start of study treatment until death from any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
OS by CD79b Status
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of start of study treatment until death from any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
OS by DLBCL/COO Subtype
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of start of study treatment until death from any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Duration of Stable Disease (DOSD) in Total Population
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The duration of stable disease (DOSD) was defined as the time (in days) from date of start of study treatment to radiological PD or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier. The DOSD was only evaluated in participants failing to achieve a best response of CR or PR, but who achieved SD (stable disease), based on the investigator assessment of tumor response according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Disease Control Rate (DCR) in Total Population
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the percentage of participants who had a best response rating of CR, PR, or SD that was achieved during treatment or within 30 days after termination of study drug. The tumor response was based on investigator assessment according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
DCR by CD79b Status
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the percentage of participants who had a best response rating of CR, PR, or SD that was achieved during treatment or within 30 days after termination of study drug. The tumor response was based on investigator assessment according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
DCR by DLBCL/COO Subtype
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the percentage of participants who had a best response rating of CR, PR, or SD that was achieved during treatment or within 30 days after termination of study drug. The tumor response was based on investigator assessment according to the criteria defined by the Lugano Classification, 2014 and assessed by CT/MRI/PET-CT.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
From start of study treatment assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies, whichever occurs first
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
A TEAE was defined as any event arising or worsening after the start of study drug administration until 30 days after the last application.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
From start of test drug to 30 days after the last test drug intake, assessed up to 2 years after the last participant's first treatment or the last participant dies (whichever occurs first), with an average of 15 weeks for individual participant
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (de novo or DLBCL transformed from follicular lymphoma on the basis of a tissue biopsy).
* Received at least one prior therapy for aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (DLBCL).
* Received CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) + rituximab or equivalent regimen.
* Patients must have measurable disease.
* Not eligible or not willing to receive the high-dose (myeloablative) chemotherapy (HDC) and stem cell transplant (SCT).
* A fresh tumor biopsy collected during screening and /or archival tumor tissue collected after the last relapse/disease progression.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) = 2.
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) = the lower limit of normal (LLN) for the Institution. (as per local standard of care) as measured by echocardiogram (ECHO) or Multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scan.
* Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Any of the following as the only site(s) of disease: palpable lymph nodes not visible on imaging studies, skin lesions, or bone marrow involvement only.
* Active CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) Grade 3/4 infection.
* Current central nervous system (CNS) involvement by lymphoma.
* Unstable angina (angina symptoms at rest), new-onset angina (begun within the last 3 months). Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months before start of study treatment.
* Uncontrolled arterial hypertension despite optimal medical management (per investigator's opinion).
* Type I or II diabetes mellitus with HbA1c > 8.5% at Screening.
* New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart disease.
* History or concurrent condition of interstitial lung disease of any severity and/or severely impaired lung function (as judged by the investigator).
* Patients who previously received therapy with copanlisib or other PI3K inhibitors are not eligible for enrollment.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
NA
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
8/05/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/01/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
67
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- Kingswood
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
- Ballarat
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
- Prahran
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
- Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2747 - Kingswood
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
3350 - Ballarat
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3181 - Prahran
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
3128 - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Antwerpen
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Bruxelles - Brussel
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Edegem
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Newfoundland and Labrador
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Aarhus C
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Odense C
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Caen Cedex
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Creteil
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Lille
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
PARIS cedex
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Pierre Benite
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
POITIERS cedex
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Nordrhein-Westfalen
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Sachsen
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Lombardia
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Cornwall
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Hampshire
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
London
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Bayer
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
To assess the potential efficacy (in terms of objective response) of single agent copanlisib in patients with relapsed or refractory Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and assess the relationship between efficacy and a potentially predictive biomarker
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02391116
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Lenz G, Hawkes E, Verhoef G, Haioun C, Thye Lim S, Seog Heo D, Ardeshna K, Chong G, Haaber J, Shi W, Gorbatchevsky I, Lippert S, Hiemeyer F, Piraino P, Beckmann G, Pena C, Buvaylo V, Childs BH, Salles G. Single-agent activity of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibition with copanlisib in patients with molecularly defined relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia. 2020 Aug;34(8):2184-2197. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0743-y. Epub 2020 Feb 14. Erratum In: Leukemia. 2024 Feb;38(2):469-472. doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-02133-2.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Bayer Study Director
Query!
Address
0
0
Bayer
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02391116
Download to PDF