Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02420821
Registration number
NCT02420821
Ethics application status
Date submitted
15/04/2015
Date registered
20/04/2015
Date last updated
30/01/2023
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Bevacizumab Versus Sunitinib in Participants With Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Atezolizumab (Anti-PD-L1 Antibody) in Combination With Bevacizumab Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2014-004684-20
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
WO29637
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
IMmotion151
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Renal Cell Carcinoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Non melanoma skin cancer
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Kidney
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-PD-L1 antibody
Treatment: Drugs - Bevacizumab
Treatment: Drugs - Sunitinib
Experimental: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab - Participants will receive both atezolizumab and bevacizumab until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or death, whichever occurs first.
Active comparator: Sunitinib - Participants will receive sunitinib until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or death, whichever occurs first.
Treatment: Drugs: Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-PD-L1 antibody
Atezolizumab will be administered at a fixed dose of 1200 milligrams (mg) via intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1 and 22 of each 42-day cycle.
Treatment: Drugs: Bevacizumab
Bevacizumab will be administered at a dose of 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) via IV infusion on Days 1 and 22 of each 42-day cycle.
Treatment: Drugs: Sunitinib
Sunitinib will be administered at a dose of 50 mg once daily, orally via capsule, on Day 1 through Day 28 of each 42-day cycle.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression as Determined by the Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or Death From Any Cause in Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1)-Selected Population
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Disease Progression (PD) was defined as greater than or equal to (\>/=) 20 percent (%) relative increase in the sum of diameters (SoD) of all target lesions (TLs), taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 millimeters (mm); \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Determined by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1 in PD-L1-Selected Population
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD, as determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm; \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-TLs. Participants without PFS event were censored at the last tumor assessment date. Participants with no post-baseline tumor assessments were censored at the randomization date + 1 day. Participants with a PFS event who missed \>/=2 scheduled assessments immediately prior to the PFS event were censored at the last tumor assessment prior to the missed visits. Median PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% confidence interval (CI) was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Died of Any Cause in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Percentage of participants who died of any cause was reported.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline until death from any cause (until data cut-off date 14 February 2020, up to approximately 57 months)
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants who were not reported as having died at the date of analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Participants who did not have post-baseline information were censored at the date of randomization + 1 day. Median OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline until death from any cause (until data cut-off date 14 February 2020, up to approximately 57 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Died of Any Cause in PD-L1-Selected Population
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Percentage of participants who died of any cause was reported.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline until death from any cause (until data cut-off date 14 February 2020, up to approximately 57 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
OS in PD-L1-Selected Population
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants who were not reported as having died at the date of analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Participants who did not have post-baseline information were censored at the date of randomization + 1 day. Median OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline until death from any cause (until data cut-off date 14 February 2020, up to approximately 57 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With PD as Determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) According to RECIST v1.1 or Death From Any Cause in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm; \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-TLs.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
PFS as Determined by an IRC According to RECIST v1.1 in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD, as determined by an IRC per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm; \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-TLs. Participants without PFS event were censored at the last tumor assessment date. Participants with no post-baseline tumor assessments were censored at the randomization date + 1 day. Median PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With PD as Determined by an IRC According to RECIST v1.1 or Death From Any Cause in PD-L1-Selected Population
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm; \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-TLs.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
PFS as Determined by an IRC According to RECIST v1.1 in PD-L1-Selected Population
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD, as determined by an IRC per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm; \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-TLs. Participants without PFS event were censored at the last tumor assessment date. Participants with no post-baseline tumor assessments were censored at the randomization date + 1 day. Median PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as Determined by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1 in Objective Response Rate (ORR)-Evaluable Population
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Objective response was defined as percentage of participants with a documented CR or PR. CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs/non-TLs and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes to less than (\<) 10 mm. PR was defined as \>/=30% decrease in the SoD of TLs (taking as reference the baseline SoD) or persistence of \>/=1 non-TL(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. The 95% CI was computed using Clopper-Pearson approach. Participants without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline until documented CR/PR, PD, or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1 in DOR-Evaluable Population
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of CR/PR to PD as determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of TLs/non-TLs and normalization of tumor marker level or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes to \<10 mm. PR: \>/=30% decrease in the SoD of TLs (taking as reference the baseline SoD) or persistence of \>/=1 non-TL(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm; \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-TLs. Participants without PD or death after a CR/PR were censored at last tumor assessment. Participants without tumor assessments after a CR/PR were censored at first CR/PR + 1 day. Median DOR was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI by the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline until documented CR/PR, PD, or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response of CR or PR as Determined by an IRC According to RECIST v1.1 in ORR-Evaluable Population
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to RECIST v1.1. Objective response was defined as percentage of participants with a documented CR or PR. CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs/non-TLs and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker level or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes to \<10 mm. PR was defined as \>/=30% decrease in the SoD of TLs (taking as reference the baseline SoD) or persistence of \>/=1 non-TL(s) and/or (if applicable) maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. The 95% CI was computed using Clopper-Pearson approach. Participants without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline until documented CR/PR, PD, or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
DOR as Determined by an IRC According to RECIST v1.1 in DOR-Evaluable Population
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of CR/PR to PD as determined by an IRC per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of TLs/non-TLs and normalization of tumor marker level or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes to \<10 mm. PR: \>/=30% decrease in the SoD of TLs (taking as reference the baseline SoD) or persistence of \>/=1 non-TL(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm; \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-TLs. Participants without PD or death after a CR/PR were censored at last tumor assessment. Participants without tumor assessments after a CR/PR were censored at first CR/PR + 1 day. Median DOR was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI by the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline until documented CR/PR, PD, or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With PD as Determined by the Investigator According to Immune-Modified RECIST or Death From Any Cause in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to immune-modified RECIST. PD was defined as \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs and all new measurable lesions, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
PFS as Determined by the Investigator According to Immune-Modified RECIST in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD, as determined by the investigator per immune-modified RECIST or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs and all new measurable lesions, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm. Participants without PFS event were censored at the last tumor assessment date. Participants with no post-baseline tumor assessments were censored at the randomization date + 1 day. Median PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response of CR or PR as Determined by the Investigator According to Immune-Modified RECIST in ORR-Evaluable Population
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to immune-modified RECIST. Objective response was defined as percentage of participants with a documented CR or PR. CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs/non-TLs or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes to \<10 mm. PR was defined as \>/=30% decrease in the SoD of TLs and all new measurable lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD), in the absence of CR. The 95% CI was computed using Clopper-Pearson approach. Participants without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline until documented CR/PR, PD, or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
DOR as Determined by the Investigator According to Immune-Modified RECIST in DOR-Evaluable Population
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of CR/PR to PD as determined by the investigator per immune-modified RECIST or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of TLs/non-TLs or reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes to \<10 mm. PR: \>/=30% decrease in the SoD of TLs and all new measurable lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD), in the absence of CR. PD: \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs and all new measurable lesions, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm. Participants without PD or death after a CR/PR were censored at last tumor assessment. Participants without tumor assessments after a CR/PR were censored at first CR/PR + 1 day. Median DOR was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI by the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline until documented CR/PR, PD, or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With PD as Determined by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1 or Death From Any Cause in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm; \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-TLs.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
PFS as Determined by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1 in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD, as determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm; \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-TLs. Participants without PFS event were censored at the last tumor assessment date. Participants with no post-baseline tumor assessments were censored at the randomization date + 1 day. Participants with a PFS event who missed \>/=2 scheduled assessments immediately prior to the PFS event were censored at the last tumor assessment prior to the missed visits. Median PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With PD as Determined by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1 or Death From Any Cause in Participants With Sarcomatoid Histology
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm; \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-TLs.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
PFS as Determined by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1 in Participants With Sarcomatoid Histology
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD, as determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>/=20% relative increase in the SoD of all TLs, taking as reference the smallest SoD on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of \>/=5 mm; \>/=1 new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-TLs. Participants without PFS event were censored at the last tumor assessment date. Participants with no post-baseline tumor assessments were censored at the randomization date + 1 day. Median PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline until documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (until data cut-off date 29 September 2017, up to approximately 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Died of Any Cause in Participants With Sarcomatoid Histology
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Percentage of participants with sarcomatoid histology who died of any cause was reported.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline until death from any cause (until data cut-off date 14 February 2020, up to approximately 57 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
OS in Participants With Sarcomatoid Histology
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants who were not reported as having died at the date of analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Participants who did not have post-baseline information were censored at the date of randomization + 1 day. Median OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline until death from any cause (until data cut-off date 14 February 2020, up to approximately 57 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Symptom Interference as Determined by M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) Part II Score
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
The MDASI is a cancer-related, multi-symptom, valid, and reliable self-report questionnaire that comprises of 23 items and two subscales: symptom severity (17 items) and symptom interference (6 items). In Part II, participants were asked to rate how much the symptoms have interfered with 6 areas of function (general activity, walking, work, mood, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life) in the last 24 hours. Each item was rated on a scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely) and total Part II score was calculated as an average of 6-item scores. Repeated measures model-estimated least-squares (LS) mean score for changes from baseline is reported at each timepoint, where a negative value indicates improvement. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = number of participants evaluable at specified time point.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1 Cycle 1); Day 22 Cycle 1; Day 1 and 22 of every cycle from Cycle 2 up to Cycle 19; Cycle length = 42 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Symptom Severity as Determined by MDASI Part I Score
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
The MDASI is a cancer-related, multi-symptom, valid, and reliable self-report questionnaire that comprises of 23 items and two subscales: symptom severity (17 items) and symptom interference (6 items). In Part I, participants were asked to rate how severe the symptoms (pain, fatigue, nausea, disturbed sleep, feeling of being distressed, shortness of breath, remembering things, lack of appetite, drowsy, dry mouth, feeling sad, vomiting, numbness or tingling, rash/skin changes, headache, mouth/throat sores, and diarrhea) were when "at their worst" in the last 24 hours. Each item was rated on a scale of 0 (not present) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Mixed-effects model-estimated LS mean score for change from baseline at the end-of treatment is reported for each item, where a negative value indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Baseline; End of Treatment (EoT) visit (up to approximately 27 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Symptom Severity as Determined by Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Interference Scale Score
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
The BFI is a valid and reliable self-report questionnaire used to assess the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue. BFI interference subscale (6 items) assessed the impact of fatigue on global domains (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life) in the last 24 hours. Each item was rated on a scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interfered completely). Change from baseline in the mean score of all 6 items at each timepoint is reported, where a negative value indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1 Cycle 1); every week for first 12 weeks, Days 1 and 22 of each cycle (Cycle 3 up to 19), within 30 days of PD (up to 27 months), at EoT (up to 27 months) and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 weeks after EoT (overall up to 27 months); 1 cycle=42 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Symptom Severity as Determined by BFI Worst Fatigue Item
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
The BFI is a valid and reliable self-report questionnaire used to assess the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue. BFI worst fatigue item assessed the severity of fatigue at its worst in the last 24 hours. The item was rated on a scale of 0 (not present) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Change from baseline in the score at each time point is reported, where a negative value indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1 Cycle 1); every week for first 12 weeks, Days 1 and 22 of each cycle (Cycle 3 up to 19), within 30 days of PD (up to 27 months), at EoT (up to 27 months) and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 weeks after EoT (overall up to 27 months); 1 cycle=42 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Treatment Side Effects Burden as Determined by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19) General Population 5 (GP5) Item Score
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
The FKSI-19 is a 19-item tool designed to assess the most important symptoms and concerns related to treatment effectiveness in advanced kidney cancer. The FKSI-19 GP5 item (bothered by the side effect of treatment) assessed side effects burden in the past 7 days on a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Repeated measures model-estimated LS mean score for changes from baseline is reported at each timepoint, where a negative value indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Day 1 and 22 of every cycle (Baseline = Day 1 Cycle 1) up to Cycle 19; Cycle length = 42 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) Against Atezolizumab
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
The number of participants with "Treatment-induced ATAs" and "Treatment-enhanced ATA" against atezolizumab at any time during or after treatment was reported. Treatment-induced ATA = a participant with negative or missing Baseline ATA result(s) and at least one positive post-Baseline ATA result. Treatment-enhanced ATA = a participant with positive ATA result at Baseline who has one or more post Baseline titer results that are at least 0.60 titer unit greater than the Baseline titer result. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants with a non-missing baseline ATA sample; 'Number Analyzed' = number of participants with a non-missing ATA sample at indicated timepoint.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Baseline (Predose [Hour 0] at Day 1 Cycle 1); Post-Baseline (Predose at Cycles 2, 4, and 8, and every eight cycles thereafter up to EoT [up to approximately 27 months] and 120 days after EoT [up to approximately 27 months]) (Cycle length=42 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Number of Participants With ATAs Against Bevacizumab
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
The number of participants with "Treatment-induced ATAs" and "Treatment-enhanced ATA" against bevacizumab at any time during or after treatment was reported. Treatment-induced ATA = a participant with negative or missing Baseline ATA result(s) and at least one positive post-Baseline ATA result. Treatment-enhanced ATA = a participant with positive ATA result at Baseline who has one or more post Baseline titer results that are at least 0.60 titer unit greater than the Baseline titer result.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Baseline (Predose [Hour 0] at Day 1 Cycle 1); Post-Baseline (Predose at Cycle 3, at EoT [up to approximately 27 months] and at 120 days after EoT [up to approximately 27 months]) (Cycle length=42 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) for Atezolizumab
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
Cmax for atezolizumab was estimated from plasma concentration versus time data.
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
30 minutes after the end of bevacizumab infusion (atezolizumab infusion duration: 30-60 min; bevacizumab infusion duration: 30-90 minutes) on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 42 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) for Atezolizumab
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
Cmin for atezolizumab was estimated from plasma concentration versus time data.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
Predose (Hour 0) on Day 22 of Cycle 1; predose (Hour 0) on Day 1 of Cycles 2; Cycle length = 42 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Cmax for Bevacizumab
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
Cmax for bevacizumab was estimated from plasma concentration versus time data.
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
30 minutes after the end of bevacizumab infusion (atezolizumab infusion duration: 30-60 min; bevacizumab infusion duration: 30-90 minutes) on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 42 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Cmin for Bevacizumab
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
Cmin for bevacizumab was estimated from plasma concentration versus time data.
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
Pre-dose (Hour 0) on Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Cycle length = 42 days)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Definitive diagnosis of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic RCC with clear-cell histology and/or a component of sarcomatoid carcinoma, with no prior treatment in the metastatic setting
* Evaluable Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk score
* Measurable disease, as defined by RECIST v1.1
* Karnofsky performance status greater than or equal to 70%
* Adequate hematologic and end-organ function prior to randomization
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Disease-Specific Exclusions:
* Radiotherapy for RCC within 14 days prior to treatment
* Active central nervous system disease
* Uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites
* Uncontrolled hypercalcemia
* Any other malignancies within 5 years except for low-risk prostate cancer or those with negligible risk of metastasis or death
General Medical Exclusions:
* Life expectancy less than 12 weeks
* Participation in another experimental drug study within 4 weeks prior to treatment
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Known hypersensitivity to any component of atezolizumab or other study medication
* History of autoimmune disease except controlled, treated hypothyroidism or type I diabetes mellitus
* History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug-induced pneumonitis, or idiopathic pneumonitis
* Positive human immunodeficiency virus test
* Active or chronic hepatitis B or C
* Severe infections within 4 weeks prior to treatment
* Exposure to oral or IV antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to treatment
* Live attenuated vaccines within 4 weeks prior to treatment (for influenza vaccination participants must agree not to receive live, attenuated influenza vaccine within 4 weeks prior to treatment, during treatment or within 5 months following the last dose)
* Significant cardiovascular disease
* Prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplantation
Exclusion Criteria Related to Medications:
* Prior treatment with cluster of differentiation 137 agonists, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4, anti-programmed death (PD)-1, or anti-PD-L1 therapeutic antibody or pathway-targeting agents
* Treatment with immunostimulatory agents for non-malignant conditions within 6 weeks or immunosuppressive agents within 2 weeks prior to treatment
Bevacizumab- and Sunitinib-Specific Exclusions:
* History of hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy
* Baseline electrocardiogram showing corrected QT interval greater than 460 milliseconds
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
20/05/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
13/12/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
915
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Lifehouse - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Macquarie University Hospital - Macquarie Park
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Calvary Mater Newcastle; Medical Oncology - Waratah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Icon Cancer Foundation - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Ashford Cancer Center Research - Kurralta Park
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Austin Hospital; Medical Oncology - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
St John of God Hospital - Murdoch
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2109 - Macquarie Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
2298 - Waratah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
4101 - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
5037 - Kurralta Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
6150 - Murdoch
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Banja Luka
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
RS
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
SP
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Nova Scotia
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Olomouc
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Praha 2
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Praha 4 - Krc
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Aarhus N
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Herlev
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Odense C
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Angers
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Bordeaux
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Caen
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Lille
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Lyon
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Marseille
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Nancy
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Saint Herblain
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Villejuif
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Essen
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Heidelberg
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
München
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Tübingen
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Campania
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Emilia-Romagna
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Lazio
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Lombardia
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Toscana
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Aichi
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Chiba
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Gunma
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Ibaraki
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Iwate
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Kanagawa
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Kumamoto
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Niigata
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Okayama
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Tokushima
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Daejeon
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Goyang-si
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Seongnam-si
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Queretaro
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Toluca
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Warsaw
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Altaj
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Niznij Novgorod
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Taoyuan
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Bangkok
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Chiangmai
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Songkhla
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Ankara
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Edirne
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Istanbul
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Bebington
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Birmingham
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Blackburn
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Cambridge
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Oxford
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Southampton
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Sutton
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Swansea
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This multi-center, randomized, open-label study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib in participants with inoperable, locally advanced, or metastatic RCC who have not received prior systemic active or experimental therapy, either in the adjuvant or metastatic setting.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02420821
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Motzer RJ, Powles T, Atkins MB, Escudier B, McDermott DF, Alekseev BY, Lee JL, Suarez C, Stroyakovskiy D, De Giorgi U, Donskov F, Mellado B, Banchereau R, Hamidi H, Khan O, Craine V, Huseni M, Flinn N, Dubey S, Rini BI. Final Overall Survival and Molecular Analysis in IMmotion151, a Phase 3 Trial Comparing Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sunitinib in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2022 Feb 1;8(2):275-280. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5981. Atkins MB, Rini BI, Motzer RJ, Powles T, McDermott DF, Suarez C, Bracarda S, Stadler WM, Donskov F, Gurney H, Oudard S, Uemura M, Lam ET, Grullich C, Quach C, Carroll S, Ding B, Zhu QC, Piault-Louis E, Schiff C, Escudier B. Patient-Reported Outcomes from the Phase III Randomized IMmotion151 Trial: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab versus Sunitinib in Treatment-Naive Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 1;26(11):2506-2514. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2838. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Rini BI, Powles T, Atkins MB, Escudier B, McDermott DF, Suarez C, Bracarda S, Stadler WM, Donskov F, Lee JL, Hawkins R, Ravaud A, Alekseev B, Staehler M, Uemura M, De Giorgi U, Mellado B, Porta C, Melichar B, Gurney H, Bedke J, Choueiri TK, Parnis F, Khaznadar T, Thobhani A, Li S, Piault-Louis E, Frantz G, Huseni M, Schiff C, Green MC, Motzer RJ; IMmotion151 Study Group. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (IMmotion151): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2404-2415. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30723-8. Epub 2019 May 9.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Clinical Trials
Query!
Address
0
0
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/21/NCT02420821/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/21/NCT02420821/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02420821
Download to PDF