Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01856309
Registration number
NCT01856309
Ethics application status
Date submitted
15/05/2013
Date registered
17/05/2013
Date last updated
6/05/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Sirukumab in Participants With RA Completing Studies CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003
Query!
Scientific title
A Multicenter, Parallel-group Study of Long-term Safety and Efficacy of CNTO 136 (Sirukumab) for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Subjects Completing Treatment in Studies CNTO136ARA3002 (SIRROUND-D) and CNTO136ARA3003 (SIRROUND-T)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
CNTO136ARA3004
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CR102023
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
SIRROUND-LTE
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Rheumatoid arthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Sirukumab 100 mg
Treatment: Drugs - Sirukumab 50 mg
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Experimental: Sirukumab 100 mg -
Experimental: Sirukumab 50 mg / placebo -
Treatment: Drugs: Sirukumab 100 mg
Sirukumab 100 mg subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0 (administered as the last dose in CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003), 2, and every 2 weeks through Week 156 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3002 and through Week 208 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3003.
Treatment: Drugs: Sirukumab 50 mg
Sirukumab 50 mg SC at Weeks 0 (administered as the last dose in CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003), 4, and every 4 weeks through Week 156 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3002 and through Week 208 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3003.
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Between sirukumab 50 mg injections, placebo SC injections will be administered at Weeks 2, 6, and every 4 weeks until the study becomes open-label, and placebo injections are discontinued.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
MACE was defined as a composite of Myocardial Infarction (MI), stroke, death, hospitalization for unstable angina, and hospitalization for Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA). Adjudication of these events by the Endpoint Adjudication Committee (EAC) was performed in a blinded fashion.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Malignancies
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Percentage of participants with one or more malignancy was reported.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Serious Infections
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Percentage of participants with one or more serious infections was reported.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforations
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Percentage of participants with one or more GI perforations was reported. GI perforation is a hole that develops through the entire wall of the stomach, small intestine, large bowel, or gallbladder.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Query!
Primary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Hepatobiliary Abnormalities
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Percentage of participants with hepatobiliary abnormalities was reported.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Query!
Primary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Serious or Moderate/Severe Systemic Hypersensitivity Reactions, or Serum Sickness Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Percentage of participants with serious or moderate/severe systemic hypersensitivity reactions, or serum sickness adverse events (AEs) was reported.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Toxicity Grade 4 Decrease in Neutrophils
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Percentage of participants with toxicity grade 4 decrease in neutrophils was reported. As per National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, toxicity grade 4 was defined as decrease in neutrophils less than (\<) 500 per Cubic Millimeter (mm\^3) or \< 0.5 \* 10\^9 per liter.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Toxicity Grade 4 Decrease in Platelets
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Percentage of participants with toxicity grade 4 decrease in platelets was reported. As per National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, toxicity grade 4 was defined as decreased in platelets \<25000/mm\^3 or \< 25.0 \* 10\^9 per liter.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With ALT >= 3*ULN, ALT >= 5*ULN and ALT >= 8*ULN
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Percentage of participants with Alanine Aminotranserase (ALT) \>= 3\*Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), ALT \>= 5\*ULN or ALT \>= 8\*ULN was reported.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With AST >= 3*ULN, AST >= 5*ULN and AST >= 8*ULN
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Percentage of participants with Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) \>= 3\*ULN, AST \>= 5\*ULN and AST \>= 8\*ULN was reported.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Either ALT >= 3*ULN or AST >= 3*ULN, and Total Bilirubin >= 2*ULN
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Percentage of participants with either ALT \>= 3\*ULN or AST \>= 3\*ULN and total bilirubin \>= 2\*ULN was reported.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Normal Total Cholesterol Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Percentage of participants with normal total cholesterol value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal total cholesterol value was defined as total cholesterol value more than (\>) 200 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Normal Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Percentage of participants with normal LDL value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal LDL value was defined as LDL value \> 130 mg/dL.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Normal High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Percentage of participants with normal HDL value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal HDL value was defined as HDL value \< 40 mg/dL.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Normal Triglyceride Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Percentage of participants with normal triglyceride value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal triglyceride value was defined as triglyceride value \> 250 mg/dL.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response Through Week 260
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
ACR 50 response is greater than or equal to (\>=) 50 percent (%) improvement in both tender joint count (68) and swollen joint count (66) and \>= 50% improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments:Participant's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10 scale, 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain),Participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10, \[0 = very well to 10 = very poor\]), Physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10, \[0=no arthritis activity to 10=extremely active arthritis\]), Participant's assessment of physical function as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (scale ranges from 0= no difficulty to 3= inability to perform a task in that area), and Serum C-reactive protein (CRP). Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Boolean-Based American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Remission Through Week 260
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Boolean based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following 4 criteria at that visit are met: tender joint count (68 joints) \<=1; swollen joint count (66 joints) \<=1; CRP \<=1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); and patient's global assessment of disease activity on visual analog scale (VAS) \<=1 on a 0 (very well ) to 10 (extremely bad) scale. Higher scores indicates worst health condition. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to the assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of the treatments they actually received.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Index Score 28 (CRP) Remission Through Week 260
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The Disease Activity Index Score 28 (DAS28) based on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is a statistically derived index combining tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), CRP and patient's global assessment of disease activity. The set of 28 joint count is based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. The values are 0=best to 10=worst. DAS28 (CRP) remission is defined as a DAS28 (CRP) value of less than (\<) 2.6 at any study visit. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to the assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of the treatments they actually received.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Through Week 260
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The CDAI score is a derived score of 4 components: tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and physician's global assessments of disease activity. The total score ranges from 0 to 76 with a lower score indicating less disease activity. A negative change in CDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity and a positive change in score indicates a worsening of disease activity. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to the assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of the treatments they actually received.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0 of primary studies), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index Based (SDAI-based) American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/ European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Remission Through Week 260
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Participant having SDAI-based ACR/EULAR remission at a visit if SDAI score is of \<= 3.3. SDAI derived by combining 5 disease assessments: tender joint (28), swollen joint (28) counts, participants global assessment of disease activity using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10 \[0 =very well to 10 = very poor\]), physicians global assessment of disease activity using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10 \[0=no arthritis to 10=extremely active arthritis\]) and CRP. 28 joints evaluated for swelling and tenderness are same set of 28 joints used in DAS28 includes shoulder, elbow, wrist, MCP1, MCP2, MCP3, MCP4, MCP5, PIP1, PIP2, PIP3, PIP4, PIP5 joints of upper right and left extremities and knee joints of lower right and left extremities. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Through Week 260
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score is an evaluation of the functional status for a participant. The 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range: 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0 of primary studies), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Response Through Week 260
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
HAQ-DI response was defined as change of less than -0.22 from baseline in HAQ-DI score. The HAQ-DI score is an evaluation of the functional status for a participant. The 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Completed participation in Studies CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003
* Signed an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study
* Signed an informed consent form (ICF) for pharmacogenetics research (how a person's genes may affect a drug's effects) in order to participate in the optional pharmacogenetics component of this study. Refusal to give consent for this component does not exclude a participant from participation in this clinical study
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Withdraws consent and/or discontinues participation in study CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003
* Is pregnant
* Has active diverticulitis
* Has any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not be in the best interest (eg, compromise the well-being) of the participant or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
7/08/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/04/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
1820
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- Victoria Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Victoria Park
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
West Virginia
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Rosario
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
San Miguel De Tucuman
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Wien
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Liège
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Plovdiv
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Manitoba
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Edmonton
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Rancagua
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Santiago
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Valdivia
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Bogotá
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Chia
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Medellín
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Croatia
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Osijek
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Croatia
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Rijeka
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Croatia
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Zagreb
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Toulouse
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Frankfurt/Main
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Göttingen
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Köln
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Vogelsang-Gommern
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Würzburg
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Ayauta
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Bunkyo-ku
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Higashihiroshima
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Hiroshima
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Izumo
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Kagoshima
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Kato
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Kawagoe
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Kita-Gun
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Kumamoto
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Kurume
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Matsuyama
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Miyazaki
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Nagano
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Nagasaki
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Nagoya
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Nishimuro-gun
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Nishinomiya
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Okayama
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Sapporo
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Sasebo
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Shibata
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Shimonoseki
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Shimotsuke
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Shinjuku-ku
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Sumida-ku
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Takaoka,Toyama
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Takasaki
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Tokorozawa
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Tokushima
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Tomishiro
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Tonami
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Tsu
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Ureshino
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Yokohama
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Busan
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Daegu
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Daejeon
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Gwangju
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Incheon
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Jeonju-si
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Namdong-Gu
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Seongnam-si
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Suwon
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Alytus
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Kaunas
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Klaipeda
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Siauliai
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Kuala Lumpur
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Kuching
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Cuernavaca
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Guadalajara
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Merida
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Mexicali
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Morelia
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
México
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
San Luis De Potosi
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Sneek
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Bydgoszcz
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Elblag
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [118]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [118]
0
0
Ustron
Query!
Country [119]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [119]
0
0
Warszawa N/a
Query!
Country [120]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [120]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [121]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [121]
0
0
Lisboa
Query!
Country [122]
0
0
Puerto Rico
Query!
State/province [122]
0
0
San Juan
Query!
Country [123]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [123]
0
0
Bucharest
Query!
Country [124]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [124]
0
0
Bucuresti
Query!
Country [125]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [125]
0
0
Iasi
Query!
Country [126]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [126]
0
0
Barnaul
Query!
Country [127]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [127]
0
0
Moscow N/a
Query!
Country [128]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [128]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [129]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [129]
0
0
Novosibirsk
Query!
Country [130]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [130]
0
0
Omsk
Query!
Country [131]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [131]
0
0
Orenburg
Query!
Country [132]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [132]
0
0
Ryazan
Query!
Country [133]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [133]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [134]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [134]
0
0
Saratov
Query!
Country [135]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [135]
0
0
Smolensk
Query!
Country [136]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [136]
0
0
Ulyanovsk
Query!
Country [137]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [137]
0
0
Yaroslavl
Query!
Country [138]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [138]
0
0
Belgrade
Query!
Country [139]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [139]
0
0
Kragujevac
Query!
Country [140]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [140]
0
0
Niska Banja
Query!
Country [141]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [141]
0
0
Cape Town
Query!
Country [142]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [142]
0
0
Port Elizabeth
Query!
Country [143]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [143]
0
0
Pretoria
Query!
Country [144]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [144]
0
0
Barakaldo
Query!
Country [145]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [145]
0
0
Coruña
Query!
Country [146]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [146]
0
0
Santander
Query!
Country [147]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [147]
0
0
Santiago de Compostela
Query!
Country [148]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [148]
0
0
Kaohsiung
Query!
Country [149]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [149]
0
0
Taichung City
Query!
Country [150]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [150]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [151]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [151]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [152]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [152]
0
0
Kharkiv
Query!
Country [153]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [153]
0
0
Kyiv
Query!
Country [154]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [154]
0
0
Odesa
Query!
Country [155]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [155]
0
0
Vinnytsia
Query!
Country [156]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [156]
0
0
Zaporizhzhia
Query!
Country [157]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [157]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [158]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [158]
0
0
Wigan
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
GlaxoSmithKline
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of CNTO 136 (sirukumab) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are unresponsive to treatment with modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or anti-TNF alpha agents.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01856309
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Aletaha D, Bingham CO, Karpouzas GA, Takeuchi T, Thorne C, Bili A, Agarwal P, Hsu B, Rao R, Brown K, Tanaka Y. Long-term safety and efficacy of sirukumab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who previously received sirukumab in randomised controlled trials (SIRROUND-LTE). RMD Open. 2021 Jan;7(1):e001465. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001465.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Query!
Address
0
0
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/09/NCT01856309/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/09/NCT01856309/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01856309
Download to PDF