Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02352753
Registration number
NCT02352753
Ethics application status
Date submitted
28/01/2015
Date registered
2/02/2015
Titles & IDs
Public title
Multicenter,Single-arm Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, & Pharmacokinetics of Denosumab in Children w/ OI
Query!
Scientific title
To Evaluate the Effect of Denosumab in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Z-score at 12 Months, as Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), in Children 2 to 17 Years of Age (at the Time of Screening) on a 3-Month Dosing Regimen With OI
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2014-000184-40
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
20130173
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
OI
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Osteogenesis Imperfecta
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Human Genetics and Inherited Disorders
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other human genetics and inherited disorders
Query!
Injuries and Accidents
0
0
0
0
Query!
Fractures
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Denosumab
Experimental: Denosumab - Participants received denosumab 1 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 60 mg) subcutaneously every 6 months (Q6M) for up to 36 months.
Early efficacy and PK data from Q6M dosing supported adjustment of the dosing regimen from Q6M to every 3 months (Q3M). Participants enrolled and still receiving denosumab were transitioned from Q6M to Q3M dosing schedule. Participants could transition to Q3M dosing schedule up to and including the date they attended for their month 36 visit under the Q6M dosing regimen. Those participants received denosumab during the Q3M dosing regimen for 12 months. Participants who transition to Q3M at month 18 of the Q6M dosing regimen received denosumab Q3M for up to 18 months.
Treatment: Drugs: Denosumab
Subcutaneous (SC) injection.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Z-Score at 12 Months
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Lumbar spine BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The results were then converted to Z-scores. The Z-score indicated the number of standard deviations away from the reference population and a score of 0 is equal to the mean. Positive changes from Baseline indicated an improvement in lumbar spine BMD.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD Z-score at 6 Months
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Lumbar spine BMD was measured by DXA adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The results were then converted to Z-scores. The Z-score indicated the number of standard deviations away from the reference population and a score of 0 is equal to the mean. Positive changes from Baseline indicated an improvement in lumbar spine BMD.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline and 6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Proximal Femur BMD Z-score at 6 and 12 Months
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Proximal femur (total hip and femoral neck) BMD Z-score was measured by DXA adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The results were then converted to Z-scores. The Z-score indicated the number of standard deviations away from the reference population and a score of 0 is equal to the mean. Positive changes from Baseline indicated an improvement in lumbar spine BMD.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 X-ray Confirmed Long Bone or New and Worsening Vertebral Fracture
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Q6M Dosing Regimen: Last 12 months of treatment (median treatment duration was 730.0 days); Q3M Dosing Regimen: Day 1 up to 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 X-ray Confirmed New and Worsening Vertebral Fracture
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Q6M Dosing Regimen: Last 12 months of treatment (median treatment duration was 730.0 days); Q3M Dosing Regimen: Day 1 up to 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 X-ray Confirmed New Vertebral Fracture
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Q6M Dosing Regimen: Last 12 months of treatment (median treatment duration was 730.0 days); Q3M Dosing Regimen: Day 1 up to 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Wth at Least 1 X-ray Confirmed Improving Vertebral Fracture
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Q3M Dosing Regimen: Baseline up to 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Vertebral and Nonvertebral Fracture
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Q6M Dosing Regimen: Last 12 months of treatment (median treatment duration was 730.0 days); Q3M Dosing Regimen: Day 1 up to 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form Physical Summary Score (CHQ-PF-50) at 12 Months
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The CHQ-PF-50 was a 50-item questionnaire completed by the parents or guardians of children between 5 and 18 years of age. The 50 questions measure 14 domains which were summarized as the physical and psychological summary scores. Each summary score was transformed and could range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better physical and psychosocial health. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased well-being.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in CHQ-PF-50 Psychological Summary Score at 12 Months
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The CHQ-PF-50 was a 50-item questionnaire completed by the parents or guardians of children between 5 and 18 years of age. The 50 questions measure 14 domains which were summarized as the physical and psychological summary scores. Each summary score was transformed and could range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better physical and psychosocial health. A positive change from Baseline indicates improved well-being.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) Disability Index Score at 12 Months
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The disability domain (questions 1-54) of the CHAQ was used to measure the participant's assessment of physical functioning or the parent's assessment of the child's physical functioning. The disability index comprised of 8 categories (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities). Scoring ranged from 1 to 5; 1 was "without any difficulty," 2 was "with some difficulty," 3 was "with much difficulty," and 4 was "unable to do." An answer of "not applicable" was scored as a 5, but was not counted. If a child required assistance from another person or used an aid or other device for any of the 8 categories, the minimum score for that category was recorded as a 3. The CHAQ questions were scored and converted to a total index score ranging from 0 to 3. Negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS) at 12 Months
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Participants were asked to report their level of pain by choosing a face that best described their own pain (the corresponding number: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10) were then recorded. The WBFPRS ranged from 0, "no hurt," to 10, "hurts worst". A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Serum Concentration of Denosumab
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Days 1 (predose), 10, 30, and 60, & weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 (end of study visit), early termination visit, & follow-up visit 12 weeks after last dose (average duration of treatment: 231 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Serum Bone Turnover Marker (BTM) - Serum Type I Collagen C Telopeptide
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline and Days 10 and 30, and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
BTM - Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline and Days 10 and 30, and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity at 12 Months
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Change from baseline in growth velocity was determined by calculating age-adjusted Z-scores for height, weight and body mass index (BMI).
Height-for-age Z-score was defined as the difference between the participant's height and the median height for the population with the same age and gender, divided by the population standard deviation.
The definitions of growth velocity based on weight and BMI were analogously calculated. To programmatically calculate the Z-scores, the National Center for Health Statistics percentiles growth charts, based on the 2000 Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/c c_charts.htm), and the CDC Anthropometric Software Package 3.0 Z-scores were used.
During normal growth, the change in z-score for each of the three should equal 0. A positive change in any of the three indicates growth acceleration, whereas a negative change indicates deceleration.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline and 12 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
• Eligibility criteria relates to initial enrollment into this study (6-Month Dosing Regimen). Subjects reconsenting to a 3-Month Dosing Regimen will not repeat eligibility assessments
• Clinical diagnosis of OI defined as a clinical history consistent with type I-IV OI Clinical severity of OI as defined by 2 or more prevalent vertebral compression fractures; OR1 prevalent vertebral compression fracture and 1 or more nonvertebral fractures within the previous 2 years; OR 3 or more fractures within the previous 2 years.
Query!
Minimum age
2
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
17
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Inability or unwillingness to comply with the requirements for frequent calcium and phosphorus monitoring for 14 days after the first dose of denosumab (only applies to the first 5 subjects age 11 to17 enrolled in the study and the first 5 subjects of any age meeting the criteria for increased bone turnover
* Currently unhealed fracture or osteotomy as defined by orthopedic opinion
* Osteotomy within 5 months of screening
* Evidence of untreated oral cavities or oral infections
* Recent or planned invasive dental procedure
* Surgical tooth extraction which has not healed by screening
* History of an electrophoresis pattern inconsistent with type I to IV OI
* History of genetic testing results inconsistent with type I to IV OI
* Abnormalities of the following per central laboratory reference ranges at screening: Serum albumin corrected calcium < lower limit of normal (LLN) Serum vitamin D < 20 ng/mL; re-screening for Vitamin D level < 20 ng/mL will be allowed, after adequate supplementation
* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Total bilirubin (TBL) > 1.5 x ULN (subjects with Gilbert syndrome are eligible)
* Serum phosphorus < LLN
* Serum alkaline phosphatase > 20% above the ULN or > 20% below the LLN
* Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (calculated bythe Schwartz equation at screening) Evidence of any of the following: Current hyperthyroidism (unless well-controlled on stable antithyroid therapy)
* Current clinical hypothyroidism (unless well-controlled on stable thyroid replacement therapy)
* History of hyperparathyroidism
* Current hypoparathyroidism
* Current, uncontrolled hypercalcemia (albumin-corrected serum Ca >10% ULN)
* History of osteomalacia or rickets (chart review)
* Other bone diseases that affect bone metabolism (eg, osteoporosis pseudoglioma syndrome, idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis, osteopetrosis, hypophosphatasia)
* History of autoimmune disease
* History of rare hereditary problems of fructose intolerance
* Positive blood screen for human immunodeficiency virus -1 or -2 antibody
* Positive blood screen for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody
* Received other osteoporosis treatment or bone active treatment with the following guidelines:
* Prior treatment with
* denosumab
* fluoride or strontium for bone disease (fluoride taken for routine dental care is permitted)
* parathyroid hormone (PTH) or PTH derivatives within 12 months prior to screening
* zoledronic acid within 6 months prior to screening
* oral bisphosphonates or intravenous bisphosphonates other than zoledronic acid if the first dose of denosumab would be before their next scheduled bisphosphonate dose would have been given
* Administration of systemic glucocorticoids (= 5.0 mg prednisone equivalents/day for more than 10 days) within 3 months of screening.
* Topical and inhaled glucocorticoids will be allowed
* Administration of any of the following treatment within 3 months of screening:
* Growth hormone (subjects on stable dose of growth hormone for at least 3 months prior to screening will be allowed)
* Currently receiving treatment in another investigational drug study, or less than 30 days since ending treatment on another investigational drugstudy(s), or current or planned participation in a clinical trial that would preclude compliance with study requirements Other inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
NA
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Other
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
24/06/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
26/03/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
153
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Research Site - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Research Site - Subiaco
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
6008 - Subiaco
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Delaware
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Varna
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Hradec Kralove
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Pardubice
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Plzen
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Praha 4
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Zlin
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Bordeaux Cedex
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Paris Cedex 15
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Saint Priest en Jarez
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Toulouse Cedex 9
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Köln
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Verona
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Rzeszow
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Cataluña
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Comunidad Valenciana
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Birmingham
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Bristol
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Glasgow
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Sheffield
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Amgen
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study in children 2 to 17 years of age with OI to evaluate efficacy and safety of denosumab.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02352753
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Amgen
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Informed consent form (ICF), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
Query!
Available to whom?
Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://www.amgen.com/datasharing
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/53/NCT02352753/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/53/NCT02352753/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02352753