Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02241382
Registration number
NCT02241382
Ethics application status
Date submitted
5/09/2014
Date registered
16/09/2014
Date last updated
26/01/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
Cologne Cardioversion Study
Query!
Scientific title
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Internal vs External Cardioversion in ICD Patients
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
UKK-CCS-2014
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Atrial Arrhythmia
0
0
Query!
Heart Failure
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
0
0
0
0
Query!
Coronary heart disease
Query!
Cardiovascular
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other cardiovascular diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - Internal Electrocardioversion
Treatment: Devices - External Electrocardioversion
Active comparator: External Electrocardioversion - Cardioversion with an external cardioverter-defibrillator with a step-up energy protocol (100, 150, 200, 360 J biphasic) in antero-posterior orientation, maintaining a \> 8 cm distance between shock electrodes and device and complying with a "cool-down" phase of 2 minute between shocks, if more than one shock is required.
Experimental: Internal Electrocardioversion - Cardioversion via the implanted ICD with a maximum energy synchronized shock (41 J, with a RV -\> SVC+can shock orientation in pts with SVC leads). After 1 ineffective internal shock, the patient will be counted as internal CV failure and cardioverted externally, following the same protocol as the external CV group.
Treatment: Devices: Internal Electrocardioversion
Cardioversion by internal shock application via the implanted ICD
Treatment: Devices: External Electrocardioversion
Cardioversion by external shock application via a cardioverter/defibrillator.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Combined Safety Endpoint
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Any one of the following as assessed by device interrogation:
* a rise in threshold (at constant duration) of \>0.5V
* exit block of one of the pacing leads
* loss of programming of the device
* a rise in shock impedance by 50% as compared to prior to CV
* a drop in battery voltage of =0.2V within 2 weeks
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
2 weeks after CV
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Efficacy Endpoint: restoration of sinus rhythm
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Assessed by ECG, within the first seconds after DC shock application (via external CV or internal shock)
- Restoration of sinus rhythm
In all patients a single p wave after cardioversion counts as a successful shock. Early recurrence of AF does not count as shock failure. In case of early recurrence of AF/AT, the successful shock may be performed once more, according to randomization. Adjunctive antiarrhythmic drug administration is left to the physician's discretion
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Within 1 minute after CV
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Induction of ventricular fibrillation
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Inadvertent induction of VF during CV, assessed by 3 or 5 lead ECG monitoring during the procedure.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
during CV procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Lead parameter indicators of impairment
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Assessed by device interrogation within 15 minutes after CV and at follow-up after 2 weeks:
* Lead impedance \> 1000 Ohm
* Lead impedance doubled
* Ventricular lead sensing \< 2mV
* Ventricular lead sensing halved, compared to prior to CV
* Atrial lead sensing \< 1mV
* Atrial lead sensing halved, compared to prior to CV
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
within 15 minutes after CV and 2 weeks after CV
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Troponin
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Comparison of Troponin T levels prior to and 3h after cardioversion
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
3h after CV
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Recurrence at follow-up
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Rhythm at follow-up assessed by ECG and device interrogation. Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia will be counted as recurrence.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
at follow-up 2 weeks after CV
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Age = 18 years
* Informed, written consent
* Atrial arrhythmia with indication for CV
* Status post ICD implantation, including CRT-D
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
99
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Age < 18 years
* Patients under guardianship or with mental disorders / disabilities
* ICD implantation < 4 weeks prior to CV
* ICD lead implantation < 4 weeks prior to CV
* Battery in EOL, ERM or ERI, ERT
* Indications of compromised leads (Impedance <200 or >2000 Ohm, Pacing threshold >5V/0.4ms), RV Sensing <4mV or RA sensing <0,1mV)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/09/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
24/01/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
230
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal Adelaide Hospital - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Schleswig-Holstein
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Aachen
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Bad Oeynhausen
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Bonn
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Coburg
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Cologne
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Göttingen
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Leverkusen
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Oldenburg
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Universitätsklinikum Köln
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Medtronic
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Implantation of internal defibrillators, capable of monitoring the heart and shocking life threatening arrhythmias back to normal rhythm, for patients with severe heart failure increases the probability of survival. Arrhythmias of the atria of the heart are common in these patients. Administering a direct current electrical shock under anesthesia (cardioversion) is the method of choice to reestablish normal sinus rhythm in this instance. Safety and efficacy of external electrical cardioversion (CV) in patients with ICDs was demonstrated in several studies. Safety of internal cardioversion (shocking the heart back into normal rhythm via the implanted defibrillator) was described in several smaller trials. Performing external instead of internal cardioversion in patients with implanted ICDs is more feasible for most hospitals, as CV can be performed without a programming computer and an additional specialist present, e.g. on the intensive care ward, and device interrogation can be done after CV at the remote ICD/pacemaker clinic. No scientific data on safety and efficacy endpoints comparing internal vs external CV is currently available. The aim of the study is to compare external vs internal electrical cardioversion for atrial arrhythmias and establish a safety and efficacy profile for external and internal cardioversion in large cohort of ICD patients.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02241382
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Daniel Steven, Prof. Dr.
Query!
Address
0
0
University Hospital Cologne
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02241382
Download to PDF