Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02389946
Registration number
NCT02389946
Ethics application status
Date submitted
2/03/2015
Date registered
17/03/2015
Titles & IDs
Public title
Safety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions
Query!
Scientific title
BIOTRONIK - A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study to Assess the SaFety and Effectiveness of the Orsiro SiroLimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment Of Subjects With up to Three De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions - V
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
BIOFLOW-V
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
BIOFLOW-V
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Coronary Artery Disease
0
0
Query!
Atherosclerosis, Coronary
0
0
Query!
Myocardial Ischemia
0
0
Query!
Ischemic Heart Disease
0
0
Query!
Acute Coronary Syndrome
0
0
Query!
Angina Pectoris
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
0
0
0
0
Query!
Coronary heart disease
Query!
Cardiovascular
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other cardiovascular diseases
Query!
Cardiovascular
0
0
0
0
Query!
Diseases of the vasculature and circulation including the lymphatic system
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - Orsiro DES
Experimental: Orsiro sirolimus coronary stent system - Intervention with a Orsiro DES.
Active comparator: Xience everolimus coronary stent system - Intervention with a Xience DES.
Treatment: Devices: Orsiro DES
Orsiro is a device/drug combination product composed of two components, a device (coronary stent system including a cobalt chromium stent platform), and a drug product (a formulation of sirolimus) contained in a bioabsorbable polymer coating.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) at 12 Months Post-Index Procedure by Bayesian Estimation
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
TLF is defined as all cardiac death, target vessel Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
12-Months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Lesions With Device Success
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Defined as attainment of \< 30% residual stenosis of the target lesion using the assigned study stent only.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Lesions With Lesion Success
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Defined as attainment of \< 30% residual stenosis of the target lesion using any percutaneous method.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Number of Participants With Procedure Success
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Defined as attainment of \< 30% residual stenosis of the target lesion using the assigned study stent only without occurrence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE; composite of all-cause death, Q-wave or non-Q-wave MI, and any clinically-driven TLR).
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure), 1, 6, 12 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Death
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure), 1, 6, 12 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Number of Participants With MACE and Individual MACE Components
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
MACE events are defined as all-cause death, Q-wave or non-Q-wave MI, or any clinically-driven TLR. The number of participants with any MACE event is provided, as well as number of participants with each of the individual components.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure), 1, 6, 12 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Number of Participants With TLF and Individual TLF Components
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
TLF events are defined as cardiac death, target vessel Q-wave or non-Q-wave MI, or any clinically-driven TLR. The number of participants with any TLF event is provided, as well as number of participants with each of the individual components.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure), 1, 6, 12 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF) and Individual TVF Components
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
TVF events are defined as cardiac death, target vessel Q-wave or non-Q-wave MI, or any clinically-driven TVR. The number of participants with any TVF event is provided, as well as number of participants with each of the individual components.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure), 1, 6, 12 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Stent thrombosis according to the Academic Research Consortium criteria.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
24 hours, 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years post-index procedure
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Subject is =18 years or the minimum age required for legal adult consent in the country of enrollment.
2. Subject is an acceptable candidate for PCI.
3. Subject is an acceptable candidate for CABG.
4. Subject has clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease, stable or unstable angina pectoris or documented silent ischemia.
5. Subject is eligible for dual anti-platelet therapy treatment with aspirin plus either, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor or ticlopidine.
6. Subject has provided written informed consent.
7. Subject is willing to comply with study follow-up requirements.
Each target lesion/vessel must meet all of the following angiographic criteria for the subject to be eligible for the trial:
1. Subject has up to three target lesions in up to two separate target vessels (two target lesions in one vessel and one target lesion in a separate vessel).
2. Target lesion must be de novo or restenotic lesion in native coronary artery; restenotic lesion must have been treated with a standard PTCA only.
3. Target lesion must be in major coronary artery or branch (target vessel).
4. Target lesion must have angiographic evidence of = 50% and < 100% stenosis (by operator visual estimate). If the target lesion is < 70% stenosed, clinical evidence of ischemia by positive functional study, CT, electrocardiography, FFR, or post infarct angina.
5. TIMI flow > 1.
6. Target lesion must be = 36 mm in length by operator visual estimate.
7. Target vessel RVD of 2.25-4.0 mm by operator visual estimate.
8. Target lesion must be treatable with a maximum of two overlapping stents.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Subject has clinical symptoms and/or electrocardiogram (ECG) changes consistent with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 72 hours prior to the index procedure. Hemodynamically stable non-STEMI (NSTEMI) subjects are eligible for study enrollment.
2. Subject is hemodynamically unstable.
3. Subject is pregnant and/or breastfeeding or intends to become pregnant during the duration of the study.
4. Subject has a known allergy to contrast medium that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or any known allergy to thienopyridine, aspirin, both heparin and bivalirudin, L-605 cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloy or one of its major elements (cobalt, chromium, tungsten and nickel), acrylic, fluoropolymers, silicon carbide, PLLA, sirolimus or everolimus.
5. Revascularization of any target vessel within 9 months prior to the index procedure or previous PCI of any non-target vessel within 30 days prior to the index procedure.
6. Planned treatment of a lesion not meeting angiographic inclusion and exclusion criteria during the index procedure or after the index procedure.
7. Planned surgery within 6 months of index procedure unless dual antiplatelet therapy can be maintained throughout the peri-surgical period.
8. History of a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months prior to the index procedure.
9. Subjects with active bleeding disorders, active coagulopathy, or any other reason, who are ineligible for DAPT.
10. Subject will refuse blood transfusions.
11. Subject has documented left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30% within 90 days prior to the index procedure.
12. Subject is dialysis-dependent.
13. Subject has impaired renal function (i.e., blood creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL or 221 µmol/L determined within 7 days prior to the index procedure).
14. Subject has leukopenia (i.e. < 3,000 white blood cells/mm3), thrombocytopenia (i.e. < 100,000 platelets/mm3) or thrombocytosis (i.e. > 700,000 platelet/mm3).
15. Subject is receiving oral or intravenous immunosuppressive therapy (inhaled steroids are permitted), or has known life-limiting immunosuppressive or autoimmune disease (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus; diabetes mellitus is permitted).
16. Subject is receiving chronic anticoagulation (e.g. coumadin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban or any other agent).
17. Subject has life expectancy of < 1 year.
18. Subject is participating in another investigational (medical device or drug) clinical study. Subjects may be concurrently enrolled in a post-market study, as long as the post-market study device, drug or protocol does not interfere with the investigational treatment or protocol of this study.
19. In the investigator's opinion, subject will not be able to comply with the follow-up requirements.
Subjects will be excluded from the trial if any of the target lesions/vessels meets any of the following angiographic criteria:
1. Target lesion is located within a saphenous vein graft or arterial graft.
2. Target lesion is a restenotic lesion that was previously treated with a bare metal or drug eluting stent (in-stent restenosis).
3. Target lesion has any of the following characteristics:
1. Lesion location is within the left main coronary artery, or within 3 mm of the origin of the left anterior descending (LAD) or left circumflex (LCX).
2. Involves a side branch of > 2.0 mm in diameter. Note: Lesions within 3 mm of the origin of the right coronary artery may be treated.
4. Target vessel/lesion is excessively tortuous/angulated or is severely calcified, that would prevent complete inflation of an angioplasty balloon. This assessment should be based on visual estimation.
5. Target vessel has angiographic evidence of thrombus.
6. Target lesion is totally occluded (100% stenosis).
7. Target vessel was treated with brachytherapy any time prior to the index procedure.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/05/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/03/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
1334
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
SA 5011 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
North Dakota
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Rhode Island
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
West Virginia
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Genk
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Roeselare
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Aarhus
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Bad Segeberg
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Minden
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Neuss
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Pécs
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Szeged
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Jerusalem
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Petach Tikva
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Rehovot
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Tel Aviv
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Daegu
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Gwangju
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Breda
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Eindhoven
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Nieuwegein
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Malaga
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Lausanne
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Zurich
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Biotronik, Inc.
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Biotronik AG
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [2]
0
0
Baim Institute for Clinical Research
Query!
Address [2]
0
0
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [3]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [3]
0
0
Medstar Health Research Institute
Query!
Address [3]
0
0
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the treatment of subjects with up to three native de novo or restenotic (standard PTCA only) coronary artery lesions compared to the Xience coronary stent system.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02389946
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Doros G, Massaro JM, Kandzari DE, Waksman R, Koolen JJ, Cutlip DE, Mauri L. Rationale of a novel study design for the BIOFLOW V study, a prospective, randomized multicenter study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Orsiro sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system using a Bayesian approach. Am Heart J. 2017 Nov;193:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 5. Kandzari DE, Mauri L, Koolen JJ, Massaro JM, Doros G, Garcia-Garcia HM, Bennett J, Roguin A, Gharib EG, Cutlip DE, Waksman R; BIOFLOW V Investigators. Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1843-1852. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32249-3. Epub 2017 Aug 26. Erratum In: Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1832. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32437-6. Kandzari DE, Koolen JJ, Doros G, Massaro JJ, Garcia-Garcia HM, Bennett J, Roguin A, Gharib EG, Cutlip DE, Waksman R; BIOFLOW V Investigators. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 25;72(25):3287-3297. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Sep 23. Roguin A, Kandzari DE, Marcusohn E, Koolen JJ, Doros G, Massaro JM, Garcia-Garcia HM, Bennett J, Gharib EG, Cutlip DE, Waksman R. Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e007331. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007331. Hemetsberger R, Abdelghani M, Toelg R, Garcia-Garcia HM, Farhan S, Mankerious N, Elbasha K, Allali A, Windecker S, Lefevre T, Saito S, Kandzari D, Waksman R, Richardt G. Complex vs. non-complex percutaneous coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis from the randomized BIOFLOW trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul;111(7):795-805. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-01994-4. Epub 2022 Feb 25. Hemetsberger R, Abdelghani M, Toelg R, Mankerious N, Allali A, Garcia-Garcia HM, Windecker S, Lefevre T, Saito S, Slagboom T, Kandzari D, Koolen J, Waksman R, Richardt G. Impact of Coronary Calcification on Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun 15;10(12):e019815. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019815. Epub 2021 May 29. Dan K, Garcia-Garcia HM, Kolm P, Windecker S, Saito S, Kandzari DE, Waksman R. Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep;13(9):e009189. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009189. Epub 2020 Sep 8. Toelg R, Slagboom T, Waltenberger J, Lefevre T, Saito S, Kandzari DE, Koolen J, Richardt G. Individual patient data analysis of the BIOFLOW study program comparing safety and efficacy of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus eluting stent to a durable polymer everolimus eluting stent. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):848-856. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29254. Epub 2020 Sep 5. Kandzari DE, Koolen JJ, Doros G, Garcia-Garcia HM, Bennett J, Roguin A, Gharib EG, Cutlip DE, Waksman R; BIOFLOW V Investigators. Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1343-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.019. Mattke S, Hanson M, Bentele M, Kandzari DE. Cost and Mortality Implications of Lower Event Rates After Implantation of an Ultrathin-Strut Coronary Stent Compared With a Thin-Strut Stent Over Four Years. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jul;21(7):835-842. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.12.018. Epub 2019 Dec 18. Mattke S, Hanson M, Dallmann AC, Bentele M. Health Economic Evaluation of an Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent Compared to a Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):752-757. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Ron Waksman, MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Medstar Washington Hospital Center
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Undecided
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/46/NCT02389946/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/46/NCT02389946/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Kandzari DE, Mauri L, Koolen JJ, Massaro JM, Doros...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Kandzari DE, Koolen JJ, Doros G, Massaro JJ, Garci...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Roguin A, Kandzari DE, Marcusohn E, Koolen JJ, Dor...
[
More Details
]
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02389946