Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02078427
Registration number
NCT02078427
Ethics application status
Date submitted
3/03/2014
Date registered
5/03/2014
Titles & IDs
Public title
ADVATE/ ADYNOVI Hemophilia A Outcome Database (AHEAD)
Query!
Scientific title
ADVATE/ ADYNOVI Hemophilia A Outcome Database
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
061001
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
AHEAD
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Hemophilia A
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Blood
0
0
0
0
Query!
Clotting disorders
Query!
Human Genetics and Inherited Disorders
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other human genetics and inherited disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Other - ADVATE
Treatment: Other - ADYNOVI
rAHF-PFM - Participants treated with rAHF-PFM alone
rAHF-PEG - Participants treated with rAHF-PEG alone
rAHF-PFM then rAHF-PEG - Participants treated with rAHF-PFM and subsequently switched to rAHF-PEG
Treatment: Other: ADVATE
Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Plasma/Albumin Free Method
Treatment: Other: ADYNOVI
Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) Pegylated
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Joint Health Outcomes - Assessed by Physical Exam Using Only the Pain, Bleeding, and Physical Exam Parameters of the Gilbert Scale
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The World Federation of Hemophilia developed a musculoskeletal evaluation system, commonly referred to as the Gilbert test, to measure hemophilia joint health status.The Gilbert test needs to be performed in the absence of acute bleed, acute pain, and acute inflammation into the evaluated joint. Four parameters are used in each Gilbert test: pain (score: 0-3), bleeding (score: 0-3), physical exam (score: 0-12), and X-ray evaluation (score: 0-13) Scores of 0, represent no pain, no bleeding, no physical exam issues, and/or no x-ray issues. Higher scores for each of these categories represents worsening conditions.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Up to approximately 12 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Annualized Bleed Rate, All Joints
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The annualized bleed rate for all joints will be calculated per participant and summarized over the set of available participants with a minimum observation period of 90 days per treatment regimen.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Annualized Bleed Rate, All Bleeds
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The annualized bleed rate for all bleeds will be calculated per participant and summarized over the set of available participants.with a minimum observation period of 90 days per treatment regimen.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Annualized bleed rate, pre-existing target joints at baseline
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The annualized bleed rate for pre-existing target joints at baseline will be calculated per participant and summarized over the set of available participants with a minimum observation period of 90 days per treatment regimen.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Incidence of New Target Joints
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The incidence of new target joints will be calculated as the total number of new target joints in all participants divided by the total number of observation days.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Status of joint health by X-ray by Pettersson scale
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The status of joint health by X-ray by Pettersson score will be summarized for each observational year.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Status of Joint Health by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scoring System- Using The Lund Scoring System (LSS)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
LSS score format= A(e:s:h). Sum of values for Subchondral Cyst (score: 1-6), irregularity/erosion of Subchondral Cortex (score: 1-4), and Chondral Destruction (score: 1-6) gives value for the A component of score. e, s, h components represent effusion/hemarthrosis, hypertrophic synovial, \& hemosiderin deposition (score: 0-4 for each). Max. score is 16(4:4:4).
Subchondral Cyst:
* =1 bone
* =2 bones
* \>3 cysts in =1 bone
* \>3 cysts =2 bones
* Largest size \>4 mm: =1 bone
* Largest size \>4 mm: =2 bones
Subchondral Cortex
* =1 bone
* =2 bones
* Involve \> half joint surface: =1 bone
* Involve \> half of joint surface: =2 bones
Chondral Destruction
* =1 bone
* =2 bones
* Full thickness defect (FTD): =1 bone
* FTD: =2 bones
* FTD involves \>1/3 of joint surface: =1 bone
* FTD involves \>1/3 of joint surface: =2 bones
Effusion/hemarthrosis (e): Hypertrophic synovial (s): Hemosiderin (h): (0-4 for each):
* 0 absent
* 1 equivocal
* 2 small
* 3 moderate
* 4 large
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Status of joint health using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) developed a scoring system for musculoskeletal evaluation, the HJHS, optimized for use in children with no or minimal joint disease.
The HJHS includes the following parameters: swelling, duration of swelling, muscle atrophy, joint pain, crepitus on motion, flexion loss, extension loss, strength and global gait.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Overall effectiveness assessment for prophylaxis therapy
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
* Excellent: Same or lower breakthrough bleed rate (BBR) within last 12 months (M) compared with prior prophylaxis; if participant did not receive prior prophylaxis with rAHF-PFM, rAHF-PEG or other Factor VIII (FVIII), same or better than expected outcome according to investigator's expectation
* Good: Minor increase in BBR within last 12M compared with prior prophylaxis; if participant did not receive prophylaxis with rAHF-PFM, rAHF-PEG or other FVIII, slightly less than expected outcome according to investigator's expectation
* Fair: Moderate increase in BBR in last 12M compared with prior prophylaxis; if participant did not receive prophylaxis with rAHF-PFM, rAHF-PEG or other FVIII, somewhat less than expected outcome according to investigator's expectation
* Poor: Significant increase in BBR in the 12M compared with prior prophylaxis; if participant did not receive prophylaxis with rAHF-PFM, rAHF-PEG or other FVIII, little to no benefit according to investigator's expectation
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone;- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years;- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Compliance with the dosing prescribed and its relationship with effectiveness
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Evaluation of patients´ compliance to prescribed prophylactic treatment will be performed by the treating physician. Compliance will be categorized according to a 4-point table (Highly compliant, Fairly compliant, Moderately compliant, Poorly compliant)
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Annual/Interval visits:- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone;- Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years;- Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Overall effectiveness assessment for on-demand treatment
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
* Excellent: Bleed episodes typically respond to same or fewer number of infusion and same or lower dose as compared with previous on-demand treatment or investigator's expectation
* Good: Most bleed episodes typically respond to same number of infusion and dose but some require more infusions or higher dose as compared with previous on-demand treatment or investigator's expectation
* Fair: Bleed episodes typically require more infusions and/or higher dose than expected as compared with previous on-demand treatment or investigator's expectation
* Poor: Bleed episodes routinely fail to respond to same number of infusion and dose and require additional or different factor concentrate for hemostatic control as compared with previous on-demand treatment or investigator's expectation
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Global effectiveness assessment for on-demand treatment
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
* Excellent: Full relief of pain and cessation of bleeding as evidenced by objective signs (e.g., swelling, tenderness, irritability, inconsolability, and decreased range of motion in the case of musculoskeletal hemorrhage) within approximately 8 hours of a single infusion. No additional infusion is required for the control of bleeding. Administration of further infusions to maintain hemostasis would not affect this scoring.
* Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after the infusion. Possibly requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution.
* Fair: Probable or slight relief of pain and slight improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after the infusion. Requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution.
* Poor: No improvement or condition worsens.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Number of rAHF-PFM or rAHF-PEG units required for bleed cessation
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF-PFM) Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Pegylated (rAHF-PEG)
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Number of rAHF-PFM or rAHF-PEG infusions required for bleed cessation
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF-PFM) Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Pegylated (rAHF-PEG)
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Incidence of target joint intervention, including surgery, radiosynovectomy, and chemosynovectomy
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; and Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Incidence of pseudo tumor development
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Quality of Life: HAL questionnaire - for adult patients
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
The the lHAL measures activities involving the upper extremities, basic activities involving ower extremities and complex activities involving the lower extremities as well as an overall physical activity score for adults.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Quality of Life: SF-12v2 questionnaire - for adult patients
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
The SF-12v2 measures generic health-related quality of life for adults.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Quality of Life: EQ-5D questionnaire - for adult patients
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
The EQ-5D measures health utility in adult participants.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Enrollment visit;Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Quality of Life: PedHAL questionnaire - for pediatric patients
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
The PedHAL measures activities involving the upper extremities, basic activities involving the lower extremities and complex activities involving the lower extremities as well as an overall physical activity score for children.
For participants 4-13 years of age:
- PedHAL (parent version)
For participants 14-17 years of age:
- PedHAL (child version)
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Quality of Life: SF-10 questionnaire - for pediatric patients
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
The SF-10 measures generic health-related quality of life for children and is parent-completed.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Quality of Life: EQ-5D (14 and up) questionnaire - for pediatric patients
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
The EQ-5D measures health utility in subjects aged 14 and up.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Chronic pain associated with hemophilia, as measured over a period of 4 weeks on an annual basis, using the visual analog scale (VAS)
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
The VAS assesses the pain using a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain).
During screening visit and on an annual basis, the investigators shall ask participants to rate the average level of chronic pain associated with hemophilia over the period of 4 weeks prior to visit date using the VAS.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Acute pain associated with hemophilia, as measured with individual bleeding episodes, using the visual analog scale (VAS)
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
The VAS assesses the pain using a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain).
Participants will be asked to provide ratings on level of acute pain associated with each bleeding episode using the VAS. The VAS scores will be recorded in the participant diary.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Number of days lost from school or work due to bleeding episodes
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Modalities of switching from a standard FVIII product to rAHF-PEG - 1
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
Difference in number of weekly prophylactic infusions between previous regimen and rAHF-PEG
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Modalities of switching from a standard FVIII product to rAHF-PEG - 2
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
Difference in number of weekly doses between previous regimen and rAHFPEG
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Enrollment visit; Screening visit; Annual/Interval visits: - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PFM alone - Up to 8 years if rAHF-PEG alone with minimum follow up of 4 years - Up to approx. 12 years rAHF-PFM and switched to rAHF-PEG; Termination visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Incidence of Inhibitors in Previously Treated Patients (PTPs) with Factor VIII (FVIII) Levels Lesser than (<)1%, Lesser Than or Equal to (<=) 2%, and <= 5% without history of inhibitor
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Incidence of Inhibitors in Previously Treated Patients (PTPs) with Factor VIII (FVIII) Levels <1%, <=2%, and <= 5% with history of inhibitor
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Incidence of Inhibitors in Previously Untreated Patient (PUPs) and Minimally Treated Patients (MTPs) with Factor VIII (FVIII) Levels <1%, <=2%, and <= 5%
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Incidence of therapy-related serious adverse events
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Incidence of therapy-related non-serious adverse events
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
0
0
Incidence of inhibitors after switching to rAHF-PEG
Query!
Assessment method [32]
0
0
Incidence of inhibitors after switching to rAHF-PEG in the same subgroups of patients
Query!
Timepoint [32]
0
0
Throughout the study period of up to approximately: 8 years (rAHF-PFM alone), or 12 years (rAHF-PEG alone or after receiving rAHF-PFM)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Participant has hemophilia A {FVIII lesser than or equal to (<=)5%}
* Participant is prescribed Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF-PFM) or Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Pegylated (rAHF-PEG) by the treating physician
* Participant or participant's legally authorized representative provides informed consent
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Participant has known hypersensitivity to the active substance or any of the excipients
* Participant has known allergic reaction to mouse or hamster proteins
* Participant has participated in another clinical study involving an investigational product (IP) or device within 30 days prior to study enrollment or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study involving another FVIII concentrate or device during the course of this study
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Query!
Duration
Query!
Selection
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
28/06/2011
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
16/01/2024
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
951
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
South Metropolitan Health Service trading as Fiona Stanley Hospital - Murdoch
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
6050 - Murdoch
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Linz
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Wien
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Ceará
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Espírito Santo
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Paraná
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Parthenon
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Pará
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
São Paulo
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Rio de Janeiro
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New Brunswick
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Saskatchewan
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Futian
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Guangdong
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Heping
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Hubei
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Jiangsu
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Shandong
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Beijing
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Nanjing
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Shenzhen
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Atlantico
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Bogotá
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Floridablanca
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Ostrava
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Praha 5
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Copenhagen
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Brest
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
CAEN Cedex
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Chambery Cedex
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Dijon Cedex
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Le Chesnay Cedex
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
LIMOGES cedex
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Nantes Cedex
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Reims Cedex
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
RENNES Cedex 09
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Rouen
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Saint Priest en Jarez
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Toulouse Cedex 9
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Athens
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Thessaloniki
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Mohács
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Nyíregyháza
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Szombathely
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Bari
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Bologna
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Catania
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Catanzaro
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Firenze
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Macerata
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Padova
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Palermo
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Reggio Calabria
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Scorrano
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Torino
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Oslo
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Bydgoszcz
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Açores
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Coimbra
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Lisboa
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Porto
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Chelyabinsk
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Petrozavodsk
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Samara
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Slovenia
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Ljubljana
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
A Coruña
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Palma de Mallorca
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Gothenburg
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Malmö
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Stockholm
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Basel
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Bern
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Lausanne
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Luzern 17
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
St. Gallen
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Wabern
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Zürich
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Hampshire
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Cambridge
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Canterbury
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
London
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Baxalta now part of Shire
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Baxalta Innovations GmbH, now part of Shire
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to document the natural history of hemophilia A disease and long-term outcomes in terms of effectiveness, safety and quality of life in participants receiving Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Plasma/Albumin Free Method (rAHF-PFM) or Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) - Pegylated (rAHF-PEG) in routine clinical practice
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02078427
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Study Director
Query!
Address
0
0
Takeda
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Informed consent form (ICF), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Query!
Available to whom?
IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02078427