Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02288897
Registration number
NCT02288897
Ethics application status
Date submitted
4/11/2014
Date registered
11/11/2014
Date last updated
19/01/2022
Titles & IDs
Public title
PV-10 vs Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma
Query!
Scientific title
PV-10 Intralesional Injection vs Systemic Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
PV-10-MM-31
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Cutaneous Melanoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Malignant melanoma
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Non melanoma skin cancer
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - PV-10 (10% rose bengal disodium)
Treatment: Drugs - Dacarbazine, temozolomide or talimogene laherparepvec
Experimental: PV-10 - Subjects will receive intralesional PV-10 to all Study Lesions on study Day 1. PV-10 should be re-administered at 28-day intervals until complete response, disease progression or study termination occurs.
Active Comparator: Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy - Subjects will receive (a) dacarbazine (intravenously at 850 m/m2) or temozolomide (orally at 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days), administered at consecutive 28-day intervals, or (b) intralesional talimogene laherparepvec administered on an initial 21 interval followed by consecutive 14 day intervals, until complete response, disease progression or study termination occurs.
Treatment: Drugs: PV-10 (10% rose bengal disodium)
Treatment: Drugs: Dacarbazine, temozolomide or talimogene laherparepvec
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
PFS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) criteria. Subjects who did not have an event of progression or death were censored at their last assessment date.
Assessment of progression was performed by the sponsor based on review of lesion measurement and clinical progression data reported by each investigator. Events signaling progression included increase in size and/or number of study lesions, onset of visceral metastatic disease, and death. For target lesions (assigned prior to randomization), complete response (CR) required disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR) required >= 30% decrease in sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all target lesions; progressive disease (PD) required >=20% increase in SLD of target lesions. Non-target lesions were followed for CR, PD, or non-CR/non-PD status using equivalent thresholds. Progression occurred when PD was observed in either target or non-target lesion.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; progression detected between formal assessments was documented at the time of detection; median follow-up time for PFS was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Complete Response Rate (CRR)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
CRR was assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria, and required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for CRR was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Duration of Complete Response (DCR)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
DCR was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis for participants achieving a complete response, and was defined as the interval from first complete response to disease progression or death; responders who did not have an event of progression or death were censored at their last assessment date. Complete response was assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria, and required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for DCR was 26.7 weeks, maximum was 77.7 weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
OS was documented at 12 week intervals commencing on withdrawal from active study participation. Documentation was made by subject clinic visit or other personal contact, telephonic contact, review of medical records, or other unequivocal evidence of survival status. OS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis, and was defined as the interval from randomization to death; subjects who did not have an event of death were censored at their last assessment date.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Assessed every 12 weeks upon withdrawal from active study participation until death, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for survival was 82.4 weeks, maximum was 167.0 weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring the frequency, duration, severity and attribution of adverse events and evaluating changes in laboratory values and vital signs.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Assessed every 4 weeks until 28 days after last treatment; median duration of treatment was 11.8 and 9.5 weeks in each treatment group, respectively.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Age 18 years or older, male or female
2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed melanoma
3. Recurrent, satellite or in-transit locally advanced cutaneous or subcutaneous melanoma
metastases (i.e., American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage IIIB, IIIC or Stage
IV M1a with no active nodal metastases)
4. At least 1 measurable Target Lesion that can be accurately measured by calipers or
computed tomography (CT) consisting of:
- at least one cutaneous lesion (each lesion = 10 mm in longest diameter or up to 5
lesions having a sum of longest diameters = 10 mm); and/or
- at least one subcutaneous lesion (each lesion = 10 mm in longest diameter by CT);
- where Target Lesions should be at least 10 mm from any other lesion
5. No lesion > 50 mm in longest diameter; and no more than 50 lesions
6. Calculated required PV-10 dose = 15 mL (based on total tumor burden)
7. Performance Status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2
8. Not a candidate for treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (e.g., failed or did
not tolerate prior therapy, or due to co-morbidities, pre-existing autoimmune disease,
drug unavailability or standard of care)
9. Not a candidate for targeted therapy with BRAF or combined BRAF/MEK inhibitors (e.g.,
failed or did not tolerate prior therapy, BRAF V600 wild-type or due to drug
unavailability or standard of care)
10. Clinical Laboratories:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) = 1.5 x 10^9/L and platelet count =100 x 10^9/L
- Creatinine = 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) or estimated glomerular filtration rate
(eGFR) = 30 mL/min/1.73 m2
- Total bilirubin = 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase
(ALP) = 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) = 2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN).
11. Thyroid function abnormality = Grade 2
12. Candidate for at least one comparator drug:
- Subjects must be candidates for at least one of the designated comparator drugs
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Presence or history of visceral melanoma metastasis
2. Presence of active nodal metastases (e.g., radiologic or clinical evidence of current
nodal disease)
3. Presence of more than 50 melanoma lesions
4. Radiation therapy to any Study Lesion within 6 weeks of initial study treatment.
5. Chemotherapy or other systemic cancer therapy within 4 weeks of initial study
treatment (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin), or regional chemotherapy (limb
infusion or perfusion) within 12 weeks of initial study treatment
6. Immunotherapy for cancer within 4 weeks of initial study treatment
7. Local treatment (e.g., surgery, cryotherapy, laser ablation) to any Study Lesion
within 4 weeks of initial study treatment
8. Anti-tumor vaccine therapy within 6 weeks of initial study treatment.
9. Investigational agents within 4 weeks of initial study treatment.
10. Concurrent or Intercurrent Illness:
- Impaired wound healing or other extremity complications due to diabetes mellitus
in subjects whose Study Lesions are located in an extremity
- Severe peripheral vascular disease in subjects whose Study Lesions are located in
an extremity
- Significant concurrent or intercurrent illness, psychiatric disorders, or alcohol
or chemical dependence that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, compromise
the subject's safety or compliance or interfere with interpretation of study
results.
- Uncontrolled thyroid disease or cystic fibrosis
- Clinically significant acute or unstable cardiovascular, cerebrovascular
(stroke), renal, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, immunological, endocrine, or
central nervous system disorders
11. Pregnancy:
- Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating
- Female subjects who have positive serum pregnancy test taken within 14 days of
study treatment
- Female subjects of child-bearing potential who are unwilling to use highly
effective contraception (e.g., combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) or
progestogen-only hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, bilateral tubal
ligation, vasectomized partner, sexual abstinence or equivalent measures) for the
duration of study treatment
12. Contraindication for all comparators:
- Subjects with contraindications to all of the designated comparator drugs
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Terminated
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/04/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/09/2019
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
20
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Nantes
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Toulouse
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Essen
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Kiel
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Mainz
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Rome
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Siena
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Oaxaca
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Sinaloa
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is an international multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of
single-agent intralesional PV-10 versus systemic chemotherapy or intralesional oncolytic
viral therapy to assess treatment of locally advanced cutaneous melanoma in patients who (1)
are not candidates for targeted therapy and (2) are not candidates for an immune checkpoint
inhibitor. Subjects in the comparator arm will receive the Investigator's choice of
dacarbazine (DTIC), temozolomide (TMZ) or intralesional talimogene laherparepvec as
determined by Investigator preference and standard of care in the Investigator's country or
region. Effectiveness will be assessed by comparison of progression-free survival (PFS)
between all intent-to-treat (ITT) subjects in the two study treatment arms.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02288897
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
This record is viewable in the ANZCTR as it had previously listed Australia and/or New Zealand as a recruitment site, however these sites have since been removed
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Eric Wachter, Ph.D.
Query!
Address
0
0
Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Summary Results
For IPD and results data, please see
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02288897
Download to PDF