Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02408523
Registration number
NCT02408523
Ethics application status
Date submitted
31/03/2015
Date registered
3/04/2015
Date last updated
17/12/2020
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Lacosamide Versus Placebo (a Pill Without Active Medication) in Patients With Idiopathic Generalised Epilepsy Who Are Already Taking Anti-epileptic Medications
Query!
Scientific title
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lacosamide as Adjunctive Therapy for Uncontrolled Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Subjects With Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2011-003100-21
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
SP0982
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
VALOR
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Epilepsy
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Epilepsy
Query!
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional(has expanded access)
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Lacosamide Tablet
Treatment: Drugs - Lasosamide Oral Solution
Other interventions - Placebo Tablet
Other interventions - Placebo Oral Solution
Experimental: Lacosamide - Lacosamide 50 mg tablets: starting with 100 mg/day at Week 1. Weekly increase in steps of 50 mg or 100 mg/day are allowed. Maximal dose 400 mg/day for adult subjects and pediatric subjects \>= 50 kg.
Lacosamide oral solution 10 mg/ml: starting with 2 mg/kg/day, titrations steps (1 mg/kg/day to 2 mg/kg/day; maximal dose 12 mg/kg/day for pediatric subjects \< 30 kg.)
Lasosamide oral solution 10 mg/ml: starting with 2 mg/kg/day, titrations steps (1 mg/kg/day to 2 mg/kg/day; maximal dose 8 mg/kg/day for pediatric subjects 30 kg to \< 50 kg.)
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Placebo 50 mg tablets: starting with 100 mg/day at Week 1. Weekly increase in steps of 50 mg or 100 mg/day are allowed. Maximal dose 400mg/day for adult subjects and pediatric subjects \>= 50kg.
Placebo oral solution 10 mg/ml: starting with 2 mg/kg/day, titrations steps (1 mg/kg/day to 2 mg/kg/day; maximal dose 12 mg/kg/day for pediatric subjects \< 30kg.)
Placebo oral solution 10 mg/ml: starting with 2 mg/kg/day, titrations steps (1 mg/kg/day to 2 mg/kg/day; maximal dose 8 mg/kg/day for pediatric subjects 30kg to \< 50kg.)
Treatment: Drugs: Lacosamide Tablet
* Active Substance: Lacosamide
* Pharmaceutical Form: Film-coated Tablet
* Concentration: 50 mg
* Route of Administration: Oral use
Treatment: Drugs: Lasosamide Oral Solution
* Active Substance: Lacosamide
* Pharmaceutical Form: Oral Solution
* Concentration: 10 mg/ml
* Route of Administration: Oral use
Other interventions: Placebo Tablet
* Active Substance: Placebo
* Pharmaceutical Form: Film-coated Tablet
* Concentration: 50 mg
* Route of Administration: Oral use
Other interventions: Placebo Oral Solution
* Active Substance: Placebo
* Pharmaceutical Form: Oral Solution
* Concentration: 10 mg/ml
* Route of Administration: Oral use
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Time to the Second Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic (PGTC) Seizure During the 24-week Treatment Period From Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 24)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The primary efficacy variable was the time to the second primary generalized tonic clonic seizure (PGTCS) during the 24-week Treatment Period. Relative difference between groups (Lacosamide vs Placebo) was expressed as Hazard Ratio.
The indicated measured values are the observed number of events of second PGTCS in the treatment period which form the basis of the statistical analysis of the time to event analysis.
The hazard ratio compares 2 treatment groups for the times to a specified number of events (125) for the combined treatment groups, and so both the number of events and the times until those events pertain to the computation of the hazard ratio.
A Hazard Ratio below 1 indicates time to second PGTCS was improved for LCM compared to Placebo.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
During the Treatment Period from Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 24)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Seizure Freedom for Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic (PGTC) Seizures During the 24-week Treatment Period From Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 24)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
A seizure-free day from primary generalized tonic clonic seizures (PGTCS) was defined as a day where no PGTCS were reported in the seizure diary and PGTCS were assessed, which was estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
During the Treatment Period from Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 24)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Time to the First Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic (PGTC) Seizure During the Treatment Period From Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 24)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The secondary efficacy variable was the time to the first primary generalized tonic clonic seizure (PGTCS) during the 24-week Treatment Period. Relative difference between groups (Lacosamide vs Placebo) was expressed as Hazard Ratio.
The indicated measured values are the observed number of events of first PGTCS in the treatment period which form the basis of the statistical analysis of the time to event analysis.
The hazard ratio compares 2 treatment groups for the times to the number of events for the combined treatment groups, and so both the number of events and the times until those events pertain to the computation of the hazard ratio.
A Hazard Ratio below 1 indicates time to second PGTCS was improved for LCM compared to Placebo.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
During the Treatment Period from Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 24)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) as Reported Spontaneously by the Subject and/or Caregiver or Observed by the Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation study participant administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational medicinal product (IMP), whether or not related to the IMP.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From Visit 1 (Week -4) to End of Study Period (up to Week 36)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Plasma Concentrations of Lacosamide
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Lacosamide plasma concentration was expressed in micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL).
Means and standard deviation (SD) were only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective timepoint. Values Below Limit of Quantification (BLQ) were replaced by value of 0 in calculations of means and SDs.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
During the Treatment Period from Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 24)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Subject with a confirmed diagnosis at least 24 weeks prior to Visit 1 and a disease onset prior to 30 years of age, consistent with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) experiencing primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures (Type IIE) that are classifiable according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of Epileptic Seizures (ILAE, 1981)
* Subject has >=3 PGTC seizures during the 16-week Combined Baseline (12-week Historical Baseline plus 4-week Prospective Baseline)
* If a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computed tomography (CT) scan has been performed, there must be no evidence of any progressive abnormality or any lesion likely to be associated with partial-onset seizures
* Subject has been maintained on a stable dose regimen of 1 to 2 non-benzodiazepine marketed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with no benzodiazepine AEDs OR 1 benzodiazepine marketed AED with 1 to 2 non benzodiazepine marketed AEDs for at least 28 days prior to Visit 1 with or without additional concurrent stable vagus nerve stimulation (VNS)
* Subjects are required to have had an electroencephalogram (EEG) report consistent with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (eg, generalized 3Hz epileptiform discharges and a normal EEG background) confirmed by a Central Reviewer
Query!
Minimum age
4
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Subject is receiving any investigational drugs or using any experimental devices in addition to Lacosamide (LCM)
* Subject meets the withdrawal criteria for SP0982 or is experiencing an ongoing serious adverse event (SAE)
* Subject has an active suicidal ideation as indicated by a positive response ('Yes') to either Question 4 or Question 5 of the 'Since Last Visit' version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
* Subject has >=2x upper limit of normal (ULN) of any of the following: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), or >ULN total bilirubin (>=1.5xULN total bilirubin if known Gilbert's syndrome). If subject has elevations only in total bilirubin that are >ULN and <1.5xULN, fractionate bilirubin to identify possible undiagnosed Gilbert's syndrome (ie, direct bilirubin <35%)
For randomized subjects with a Baseline result >ULN for ALT, AST, ALP, or total bilirubin, a Baseline diagnosis and/or the cause of any clinically meaningful elevation must be understood and recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF).
If subject has >ULN ALT, AST, or ALP that does not meet the exclusion limit at screening, repeat the tests, if possible, prior to dosing to ensure there is no further ongoing clinically relevant increase. In case of a clinically relevant increase, inclusion of the subject must be discussed with the Medical Monitor.
Tests that result in ALT, AST, or ALP up to 25% above the exclusion limit may be repeated once for confirmation. This includes re-screening.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/04/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/06/2019
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
242
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Sp0982 981 - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Sp0982 980 - Chatswood
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Sp0982 985 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Sp0982 986 - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Chatswood
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Brussels
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Curitiba
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Florianópolis
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Passo Fundo
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Porto Alegre
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Rio De Janeiro
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
São Paulo
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Blagoevgrad
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Beijing
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Changchun
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Chongqing
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Fuzhou
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Hangzhou
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Shanghai
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Ostrava poruba
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Praha
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Zlín
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Bron
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Lille Cedex
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Nancy
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Rennes Cedex 9
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Erlangen
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Freiburg
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Marburg
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Muenchen
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Szeged
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Re?ovot
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Tel HaShomer
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Torino
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Asaka
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Fukuoka-shi
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Gifu
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Hamamatsu
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Hiroshima
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Itami
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Kagoshima
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Kodaira
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Kokubunji
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Niigata
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Sapporo
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Shinjuku-Ku
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Shizuoka
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Omura
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Daegu
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Guadalajara
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Czestochowa
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Gdynia
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Gliwice
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Katowice
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Tyniec Maly
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Lisboa
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Iasi
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Timisoara
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Ekaterinburg
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Kazan
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Pyatigorsk
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Samara
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Smolensk
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Bardejov
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Hlohovec
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Córdoba
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Málaga
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Pharmaceutical Research Associates
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Evaluating efficacy \& safety of lacosamide versus Placebo in a blinded fashion as add-on Therapy for Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures in subject 4 years of age or greater with idiopathic generalized epilepsy currently taking 1 to 3 antiepileptic drugs. Maximum duration of study drug administration is 28 weeks. Eligible subjects may choose to enter the open-label extension study after completion.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02408523
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
UCB Cares
Query!
Address
0
0
+1 844 599 2273 (UCB)
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/23/NCT02408523/SAP_000.pdf
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/23/NCT02408523/Prot_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02408523
Download to PDF