Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02604433
Registration number
NCT02604433
Ethics application status
Date submitted
21/10/2015
Date registered
13/11/2015
Date last updated
18/04/2023
Titles & IDs
Public title
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Placebo in Adults Who Require Regular Red Blood Cell Transfusions Due to Beta (ß) Thalassemia
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) in Adults With Transfusion Dependent Beta (B)-Thalassemia
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
ACE-536-B-THAL-001
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
BELIEVE
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Erythrocyte Transfusion
0
0
Query!
Beta-Thalassemia
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Blood
0
0
0
0
Query!
Haematological diseases
Query!
Blood
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other blood disorders
Query!
Human Genetics and Inherited Disorders
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other human genetics and inherited disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Luspatercept
Other interventions - Placebo
Experimental: Luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) - Luspatercept, subcutaneous(ly) (SC) once every 21 days
Placebo comparator: Placebo plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) - normal saline solution subcutaneous(ly) (SC) once every 21 days
Treatment: Drugs: Luspatercept
Subjects will start with luspatercept at 1 mg/kg dose level.
Other interventions: Placebo
Placebo, Subcutaneous, every 21 days.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Erythroid Response - Week 13 to Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Erythroid Response was defined as red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline = 33% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Week 13 - 24 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved = 33% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 37 to Week 48
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Percentage of participants who achieved a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline = 33% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Weeks 37 - 48 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 37 to Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieve = 50% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 13 to Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Percentage of participants who achieved a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline = 50% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Weeks 13 - 24 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieve = 50% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 37 to Week 48
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Percentage of participants who achieved a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline = 50% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Week 37 to Week 48 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 13 to Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Baseline was defined as the total number of Red Blood Cells (RBC) units transfused during the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1. This is compared to the total number of RBC units transfused during the 12-week interval from treatment weeks 13-24.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline In Liver Iron Concentration (LIC) At Week 48
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Baseline was defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug was administered; if multiple values were present for the same date, the average of these values was used. If a participant had 1 postbaseline assessment, it was used as the Week 48 value. If a participant had multiple postbaseline assessments, the last one was used as the Week 48 value. The value of LIC was collected by magnetic resonance imaging. Participants with a LIC value \> 43 mg/g were not included in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline: Week -12 to Day -1; Treatment: Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline In Mean Daily Dose Of Iron Chelation Therapies (ICT) At Week 48
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Three different types of Iron Chelation Therapy (ICT) were analyzed: 1. Deferasirox 2. Deferiprone 3. Deferoxamine Mesilate/Deferoxamine The baseline mean daily dose was calculated using the ICT dosage during the 12 weeks prior to first study drug administration and the postbaseline mean daily dose was calculated during the last 12 weeks of the 48-week double-blind Treatment Period or the last 12 weeks of the study treatment for early discontinued participants.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline In Mean Serum Ferritin At Week 48
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
For each participant, the baseline mean serum ferritin level was calculated during the 12 weeks prior to first study drug administration. The postbaseline mean serum ferritin level was calculated during the last 12 weeks of the 48-week double-blind Treatment Period or last 12 weeks of study treatment, if discontinued early. The change was calculated as the difference of post baseline mean serum ferritin level and baseline mean serum ferritin level.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline In Total Hip And Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) At Week 48
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
For BMD, the lumbar spine and total hip were measured at baseline and 48 weeks by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Baseline was defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values was used. If during the 48 week double-blinded treatment period, a participant has only one assessment, it is counted as 'Week 48' visit; if a participant has multiple assessments, the last one is used as 'Week 48' visit. The analysis was done on the population that had at least 2 measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline: Day 1; Treatment: Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline In Myocardial Iron At Week 48
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Myocardial Iron levels were measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), using MRI parameter T2\* (Unit: ms). T2\* values correlates with heart failure (HF) risk (e.g. T2\*\<6ms: high HF risk).
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline: Day 1; Treatment: Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in the Transfusion-dependent Quality of Life (TranQol) Questionnaire At Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The TranQol is a self-administered quality of life tool developed for beta-thalassemia patients. The adult self-report version used in this study, includes 36 questions assessed on a 5-point response, that are grouped into 5 domains (Physical Health, Emotional Health, Sexual Health, Family Functioning, School/Career Functioning). Scores are calculated according to specific scoring algorithms developed by the authors. Both individual domains score and the total score range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Total Score and Physical Health domain score are reported. Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline: 4 weeks prior to Day 1; Treatment: Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaire At Weeks 24
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The SF-36 (version 2) is a generic, self-administered instrument consisting of 8 multi-item scales that assess 8 health domains. The raw score for each health domain is transformed into a 0 (worst) to 100 (best) domain score. The 0-100 scale score for each health domain is further converted to normbased scores using a T-score transformation, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher norm-based T-scores indicate better heath/QoL. The domains/summaries reported are: 1. Physical Functioning (Range of possible T-scores is 19.26 - 57.54) 2. General Health (Range of possible T-scores is 18.95 - 66.50) 3. Physical Component summary (PCS) (Range of possible T-scores is 5.02 - 79.78). Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline: 4 weeks prior to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Number of Participants Who Utilized Healthcare Resources During Study
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Number of participants who had any of the following types of Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): - a doctor office visit (non-study scheduled) - an emergency department visit - a hospitalization
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From informed consent signing (up to 12 weeks before start of treatment) to end of treatment (up to approximately 227 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Number of Days Spent in Higher Care Hospital Units
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Types of hospitals units considered to be 'higher care' are: - Intensive Care Unit - Coronary Care Unit
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
From informed consent signing (up to 12 weeks before start of treatment) to end of treatment (up to approximately 227 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Percentage Of Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent For = 8 Weeks During Treatment
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Transfusion independence was defined as the absence of any transfusion during any consecutive "rolling" 8-week time interval within the treatment period, i.e, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57 and so on.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Duration of Reduction in Transfusion Burden
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Responders were defined as subjects who achieved = 33% reduction or = 50% reduction in Red Blood Cells Transfusion (RBC-T) burden from baseline with a reduction of at least 2 RBC units during any rolling 12-week interval. The duration of reduction is calculated as Last Day of Response - First day of response +1
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
From first dose to end of study treatment (up to approximately 215 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Longest Duration of Transfusion Independence
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Transfusion independence was defined as the absence of any transfusion during any consecutive "rolling" 8-week time interval within the treatment period, ie, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57 and so on. Longest duration of transfusion independence was estimated based on Kaplan-Meier model.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Time to Erythroid Response
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Time to erythroid response was defined as the time from first dose of the study drug to first erythroid response. This is reported for participants with a = 33% reduction from baseline in RBC transfusion burden (with a reduction of at least 2 units) for any 12-week interval., as well as participants with a = 50% reduction from baseline in RBC transfusion burden (with a reduction of at least 2 units) for any 12-week interval.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
From first dose to 48 weeks following first dose
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Post-Baseline Transfusion Event Frequency
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
The number of transfusion events after start of study treatment were evaluated. For the definition of transfusion events, if multiple transfusions happen on the same date, they are counted as one event; if multiple transfusions happen on two consecutive dates, they are counted as one event; if multiple transfusions happen on three consecutive dates, they are counted as two events. Results are presented in 24-week intervals, up to 96 weeks after start of study treatment
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Clearance (CL/F)
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Volume of Distribution of the Central Compartment (V1/F)
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Elimination Half-life (t1/2)
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax)
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration for the Starting Dose (Cmax)
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration at Steady State for the Starting Dose (Cmax,ss)
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve at Steady State for the Starting Dose (AUCss)
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that - Results in death - Is life-threatening - Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization - Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity - Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect - Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03): - Grade 1 = Mild - Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention) - Grade 3 = Severe (limitation in activity; medical intervention required) - Grade 4 = Life-threatening - Grade 5 = Death
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
From first dose to 90 days following last dose (up to approximately 52 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Participants With Pre-Existing and/or Treatment-Emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA)
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
Number of participants with positive ADA prior to taking study drug and/or during study. A participant was counted as "treatment-emergent" if there was a positive post-baseline sample while the baseline sample was ADA negative, or there was a positive post-baseline sample with a titer = 4-fold of the baseline titer while the baseline sample was ADA positive. A participant was counted as "preexisting" if the baseline sample was ADA positive and the participant was not qualified for "treatment-emergent."
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Timeframe: pre-dose, Day 1, Days 22, 64, 106, 148, 232, 316
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
1. Male or female, =18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent document (ICF).
2. Subject must understand and voluntarily sign an Inform Consent Form prior to any study-related assessments/procedures being conducted.
3. Subject is willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
4. Documented diagnosis of ß-thalassemia or Hemoglobin E/ß-thalassemia. (ß-thalassemia with mutation and/or multiplication of alpha globin is allowed).
5. Regularly transfused, defined as: 6-20 Red Blood Cell (RBC) units* in the 24 weeks prior to randomization and no transfusion-free period for = 35 days during that period.
* Sites who prescribe transfusions and have the transfusion records only in volumes should use for conversion of volume to units the below criteria, in order to obtain number of units within the last 24 weeks to assess the eligibility: 1 unit in this protocol refers to a quantity of packed RBCs approximately 200-350 mL. (i) sites who use transfusion bags within this range, or = 350 mL, the conversion in units should be done by dividing the volume transfused to the patient by 350 mL, (ii) sites who use transfusion bags < 200 mL, the conversion in units should be done by dividing the volume transfused to the patient by 200 mL.
6. Performance status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1.
7. A female of childbearing potential (FCBP) for this study is defined as a female who: 1) has achieved menarche at some point, 2) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or 3) has not been naturally postmenopausal (amenorrhea following cancer therapy does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 24 consecutive months (ie, has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months). FCBP participating in the study must:
1. Have two negative pregnancy tests as verified by the Investigator prior to starting study therapy. She must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing during the course of the study, and after end of study treatment. This applies even if the subject practices true abstinence ** from heterosexual contact.
2. Either commit to true abstinence** from heterosexual contact (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis and source documented) If a FCBP engages in sexual activity that may result in a pregnancy, she must agree to use, and be able to comply with, effective*** contraception without interruption, 28 days prior to starting investigational product, during the study therapy (including dose interruptions), and for 12 weeks (approximately five times the mean terminal half-life of luspatercept based on multiple-dose Pharmacokinetic PK) data) after discontinuation of study therapy.
* True abstinence is acceptable when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. [Periodic abstinence (eg, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.] *** Agreement to use highly effective methods of contraception that alone or in combination result in a failure rate of a Pearl index of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly throughout the course of the study.
Such methods include: Combined (estrogen and progesterone/progestin containing) hormonal contraception: Oral; Intravaginal; Transdermal; Progestogen/progestin only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: Oral; Injectable hormonal contraception; Implantable hormonal contraception; Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD); Placement of an intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS); Bilateral tubal occlusion; Vasectomized partner; Sexual Abstinence.
8. Male subjects must:
* Practice true abstinence or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and for at least 12 weeks (approximately five times the mean terminal half-life of luspatercept based on multiple-dose PK data) following investigational product discontinuation, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment:
1. Any significant medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from participating in the study.
2. Any condition including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study.
3. Any condition that confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
4. A diagnosis of Hemoglobin S/ß-thalassemia or alpha (a)-thalassemia (eg, Hemoglobin H);
5. Evidence of active hepatitis C (HCV) infection as demonstrated by a positive HCV-RNA test of sufficient sensitivity, or active infectious hepatitis B as demonstrated by the presence of HBsAg and/or HBVDNA-positive,, or known positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
Note: Subjects receiving antiviral therapies should have 2 negative HCVRNA tests 3 months apart.(ie, one test at the end of the antiviral therapy and a second test 3 months following the first test).
6. Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) or stroke requiring medical intervention = 24 weeks prior to randomization.
7. Use of chronic anticoagulant therapy is excluded, unless the treatment stopped at least 28 days prior to randomization. Anticoagulant therapies used for prophylaxis for surgery or high risk procedures as well as low Molecular Weight (LMW) heparin for superficial venous thrombosis and chronic aspirin are allowed.
8. Platelet count > 1000 x 109/L
9. Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus within 24 weeks prior to randomization as defined by short term (eg, hyperosmolar or ketoacidotic crisis) and/or history of diabetic cardiovascular complications (eg, stroke or myocardial infarction).
10. Treatment with another investigational drug or device = 28 days prior to randomization.
11. Prior exposure to sotatercept (ACE-011) or luspatercept (ACE-536).
12. Use of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) = 24 weeks prior to randomization.
13. Iron chelation therapy, if initiated = 24 weeks prior to randomization (allowed if initiated > 24 weeks before or during treatment).
14. Hydroxyurea treatment = 24 weeks prior to randomization.
15. Pregnant or lactating females.
16. Uncontrolled hypertension. Controlled hypertension for this protocol is considered = Grade 1 according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 (current active minor version).
17. Major organ damage, including:
1. Liver disease with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) or history of evidence of cirrhosis;
2. Heart disease, heart failure as classified by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification 3 or higher, or significant arrhythmia requiring treatment, or recent myocardial infarction within 6 months of randomization.
3. Lung disease, including pulmonary fibrosis or pulmonary hypertension which are clinically significant ie, = Grade 3 NCI CTCAE version 4.0 (current active minor version).
4. Creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min (per Cockroft-Gault formula).
18. Proteinuria = Grade 3 according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0 (current active minor version).
19. Chronic systemic glucocorticoids = 12 weeks prior to randomization (physiologic replacement therapy for adrenal insufficiency is allowed). Single day glucocorticoid treatment (eg, for prevention or treatment of transfusion reactions, is allowed).
20. Major surgery = 12 weeks prior to randomization (subjects must have completely recovered from any previous surgery prior to randomization).
21. History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to recombinant proteins or excipients in the investigational product (see Investigator Brochure).
22. Cytotoxic agents, immunosuppressants = 28 days prior to randomization (ie, antithymocite globulin (ATG) or cyclosporine)
23. History of malignancy with the exception of:
1. Curatively resected nonmelanoma skin cancer.
2. Curatively treated cervical carcinoma in situ.
3. Other solid tumor with no known active disease in the opinion of the investigator.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
2/05/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/01/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
336
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Prince of Wales Hospital - Randwick
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Mater Hospital Brisbane - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Royal Adelaide Hospital Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Monash Medical Centre - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2031 - Randwick
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4101 - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
5000 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
3168 - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Plovdiv
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Varna
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Creteil
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Lille
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Marseille Cedex 9
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Ampelokipi - Athens
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Athens
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Rio Patras
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Thessaloniki
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Beer Sheva
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Haïfa (Afula)
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Jerusalem
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Nahariya
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Petah Tikva
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Brindisi
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Cagliari
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Ferrara
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Genoa
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Milan
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Naples
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Orbassano
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Palermo
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Verona
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Lebanon
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Beirut
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Johor
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Kedah
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Perak
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Sabah
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Sarawak
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Georgetown
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Changhua City
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Kaohsiung
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Taipei, Zhongzheng Dist.
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Bangkok
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Chiang Mai
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Tunisia
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Sousse
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Tunisia
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Tunis
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Adana
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Ankara
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Antalya
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Istanbul
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Izmir
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Mersin
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Leeds
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
London Bloomsbury
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Celgene
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in adults who require regular red blood cell transfusion due to (ß)-thalassemia. The study is divided into the following periods: * Historical Period, * Screening/Run-in Period, * Double-blind Treatment Period (48 weeks), * Double-blind Long-term Treatment Period, (at the investigator's discretion an additional 48 weeks), * Open-Label Phase post unblinding and upon Data Monitoring Committee positive recommendation * Post-treatment Follow-up Period
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02604433
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Porter J. Beyond transfusion therapy: new therapies in thalassemia including drugs, alternate donor transplant, and gene therapy. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):361-370. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.361. Piga A, Perrotta S, Gamberini MR, Voskaridou E, Melpignano A, Filosa A, Caruso V, Pietrangelo A, Longo F, Tartaglione I, Borgna-Pignatti C, Zhang X, Laadem A, Sherman ML, Attie KM. Luspatercept improves hemoglobin levels and blood transfusion requirements in a study of patients with beta-thalassemia. Blood. 2019 Mar 21;133(12):1279-1289. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-879247. Epub 2019 Jan 7. Cappellini MD, Taher AT. The use of luspatercept for thalassemia in adults. Blood Adv. 2021 Jan 12;5(1):326-333. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002725. Cappellini MD, Viprakasit V, Taher AT, Georgiev P, Kuo KHM, Coates T, Voskaridou E, Liew HK, Pazgal-Kobrowski I, Forni GL, Perrotta S, Khelif A, Lal A, Kattamis A, Vlachaki E, Origa R, Aydinok Y, Bejaoui M, Ho PJ, Chew LP, Bee PC, Lim SM, Lu MY, Tantiworawit A, Ganeva P, Gercheva L, Shah F, Neufeld EJ, Thompson A, Laadem A, Shetty JK, Zou J, Zhang J, Miteva D, Zinger T, Linde PG, Sherman ML, Hermine O, Porter J, Piga A; BELIEVE Investigators. A Phase 3 Trial of Luspatercept in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent beta-Thalassemia. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1219-1231. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910182.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Query!
Address
0
0
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/33/NCT02604433/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/33/NCT02604433/SAP_002.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Porter J. Beyond transfusion therapy: new therapie...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Piga A, Perrotta S, Gamberini MR, Voskaridou E, Me...
[
More Details
]
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02604433
Download to PDF