Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02928224
Registration number
NCT02928224
Ethics application status
Date submitted
16/08/2016
Date registered
10/10/2016
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Encorafenib + Cetuximab Plus or Minus Binimetinib vs. Irinotecan/Cetuximab or Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinic Acid (FA)/Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Cetuximab With a Safety Lead-in of Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab in Patients With BRAF V600E-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Query!
Scientific title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, 3-Arm Phase 3 Study of Encorafenib + Cetuximab Plus or Minus Binimetinib vs. Irinotecan/Cetuximab or Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinic Acid (FA)/Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Cetuximab With a Safety Lead-in of Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab in Patients With BRAF V600E-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
BEACON CRC
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
ARRAY-818-302
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
BEACON CRC
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
BRAF V600E-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Bowel - Back passage (rectum) or large bowel (colon)
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Encorafenib
Treatment: Drugs - Binimetinib
Treatment: Drugs - Cetuximab
Treatment: Drugs - Irinotecan
Treatment: Drugs - Folinic Acid
Treatment: Drugs - 5-Fluorouracil
Experimental: Safety Lead-in, Triplet Arm - Encorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximab.
Experimental: Doublet Arm - Encorafenib + cetuximab.
Active comparator: Control Arm - Investigator's choice of either irinotecan/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab.
Treatment: Drugs: Encorafenib
Orally, once daily.
Treatment: Drugs: Binimetinib
Orally, twice daily.
Treatment: Drugs: Cetuximab
Standard of care.
Treatment: Drugs: Irinotecan
Standard of care.
Treatment: Drugs: Folinic Acid
Standard of care.
Treatment: Drugs: 5-Fluorouracil
Standard of care.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Cycle 1 (up to 28 days)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Number of participants reporting AEs were reported in this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Modifications and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) - Interim Analysis
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Number of participants with dose interruptions, dose modifications and dose discontinuations due to AEs were reported in this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Modifications and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) - Final Analysis
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Number of participants according to incidence of dose interruptions, dose modifications and dose discontinuations due to AEs were reported in this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm - Interim Analysis
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From randomization to death due to any cause until 204 deaths were observed (maximum treatment exposure of 89.1 weeks for triplet arm and 52.4 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Primary outcome [6]
0
0
(Phase 3) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), v1.1 of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 millimeter \[mm\] short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by BICR
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented disease progression (PD) or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by BICR
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by BICR
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by BICR
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Doublet Arm vs. Control Arm
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
From randomization to death due to any cause until 204 deaths were observed (maximum treatment exposure of 89.7 weeks for doublet arm and 52.4 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Triplet Arm vs. Doublet Arm
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
From randomization to death due to any cause until 204 deaths were observed (maximum treatment exposure of 89.7 weeks for doublet arm and 89.1 weeks for triplet arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented disease progression (PD) or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by BICR
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response.
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response.
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response.
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
Query!
Assessment method [32]
0
0
Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response.
Query!
Timepoint [32]
0
0
From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [33]
0
0
(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [33]
0
0
Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response.
Query!
Timepoint [33]
0
0
From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)
Query!
Secondary outcome [34]
0
0
(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
Query!
Assessment method [34]
0
0
The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions generating 5 functional scores (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, \& social); a global health (GH) status/global quality of life scale score; 3 symptom scale scores (fatigue, pain, \& nausea \& vomiting); \& 6 standalone one-item scores that capture additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, \& diarrhea) \& perceived financial burden. All items were graded by severity experienced during previous week \& used 4-point-scale (1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: quite a bit, 4: very much). The scores were converted to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale ranging from 0-100. Higher scores indicating higher response levels (i.e., higher functioning, higher symptom severity).
Query!
Timepoint [34]
0
0
Baseline, Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 , C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [35]
0
0
(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
Query!
Assessment method [35]
0
0
FACT-C= Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), which assessed HRQoL of cancer participants \& participants with other chronic illnesses. It consists of total 36 items (27 items of general version of FACT-C and disease-specific subscale containing 9 CRC-specific items), summarized to 5 subscales: physical well-being (7 items), functional well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items); all 3 subscales range:0-28, emotional well-being (6 items) range: 0-24, colorectal cancer subscale (9 items) range: 0-36; higher subscale score= better QoL. All single-item measures range: 0= 'Not at all' to 4= 'Very much'. Table summarizes functional well-being subscale, individual questions are linearly scaled \& combined to form functional well-being subscale score (range 0-28). High score represents better QoL.
Query!
Timepoint [35]
0
0
Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [36]
0
0
(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
Query!
Assessment method [36]
0
0
The EQ-5D-5L contains 1 item for each of 5 dimensions of health-related QoL (i.e., mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression). Response options for each item varied from having no problems to moderate problems or extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L (v4.0) is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. The EQ-5D-5L is frequently used for economic evaluations of health care and has been recognized as a valid and reliable instrument for this purpose. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) is a score that is directly reported by the participant and ranges from 0 to 100 (higher is better quality health).
Query!
Timepoint [36]
0
0
Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [37]
0
0
(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
Query!
Assessment method [37]
0
0
The PGIC is a measure of participant's perceptions of change in their symptoms over time that can be used as an anchoring method to determine the minimal clinically important difference for other participant reported outcome (PROs). For this assessment, participants answered the following question: "Since starting treatment, my colorectal cancer symptoms are: (1) very much improved, (2) much improved, (3) minimally improved, (4) no change, (5) minimally worse, (6) much worse or (7) very much worse."
Query!
Timepoint [37]
0
0
Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [38]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Cetuximab
Query!
Assessment method [38]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [38]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [39]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Encorafenib
Query!
Assessment method [39]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [39]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [40]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Binimetinib
Query!
Assessment method [40]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [40]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [41]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
Query!
Assessment method [41]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [41]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [42]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Cetuximab
Query!
Assessment method [42]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [42]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [43]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Encorafenib
Query!
Assessment method [43]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [43]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [44]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Binimetinib
Query!
Assessment method [44]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [44]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [45]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
Query!
Assessment method [45]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [45]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [46]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Cetuximab
Query!
Assessment method [46]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [46]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [47]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Encorafenib
Query!
Assessment method [47]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [47]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [48]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Binimetinib
Query!
Assessment method [48]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [48]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [49]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
Query!
Assessment method [49]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [49]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [50]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Binimetinib
Query!
Assessment method [50]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [50]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [51]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Encorafenib
Query!
Assessment method [51]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [51]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [52]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Cetuximab
Query!
Assessment method [52]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [52]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [53]
0
0
(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for a Metabolite of Binimetinib
Query!
Assessment method [53]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [53]
0
0
Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [54]
0
0
(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Encorafenib
Query!
Assessment method [54]
0
0
The reported cross-arm CL/F value is a fixed-effect parameter determined from a population PK analysis. The analysis included pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register.
Query!
Timepoint [54]
0
0
2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [55]
0
0
(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Binimetinib
Query!
Assessment method [55]
0
0
The reported cross-arm CL/F value is a fixed-effect parameter determined from a population PK analysis. The analysis included pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register.
Query!
Timepoint [55]
0
0
2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [56]
0
0
(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Clearance (CL) for Cetuximab
Query!
Assessment method [56]
0
0
The reported cross-arm CL/F value is a fixed-effect parameter determined from a population PK analysis. The analysis included pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register.
Query!
Timepoint [56]
0
0
2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (each cycle of 28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [57]
0
0
Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Hematology and Coagulation Laboratory Parameters
Query!
Assessment method [57]
0
0
Clinically notable shifts was defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to more than or equal to (\>=) Grade 3 based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 where Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life threatening and Grade 5: death.
Query!
Timepoint [57]
0
0
From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [58]
0
0
Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters
Query!
Assessment method [58]
0
0
Clinically notable shifts was defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= Grade 3 based on CTCAE version 4.03 where Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life threatening and Grade 5: death.
Query!
Timepoint [58]
0
0
From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [59]
0
0
Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameters
Query!
Assessment method [59]
0
0
Clinically notable shifts was defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= Grade 3 based on CTCAE version 4.03 where Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life threatening and Grade 5: death.
Query!
Timepoint [59]
0
0
From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [60]
0
0
Phase 3: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Clinically Notable Vital Sign Abnormalities
Query!
Assessment method [60]
0
0
Newly occurring clinically notable changes was defined as participants not meeting the criterion at baseline and meeting criterion post-baseline. The criterion included: low/high systolic blood pressure (SBP): \<= 90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) with decrease from baseline of \>= 20mmHg or \>= 160mmHg with increase from baseline of \>= 20mmHg, low or high diastolic blood pressure (DBP): \<= 50mmHg with decrease from baseline of \>= 15mmHg or \>= 100mmHg with increase from baseline of \>= 15mmHg, low or high pulse: \<= 50 beats/min with decrease from baseline of \>= 15 beats/min or \>= 120 beats/min with increase from baseline of \>= 15 beats/min, low or high temperature: \<= 36 degree Celsius (deg C) or \>= 37.5 deg C.
Query!
Timepoint [60]
0
0
From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [61]
0
0
Phase 3: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Clinically Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
Query!
Assessment method [61]
0
0
Newly occurring clinically notable changes was defined as participants not meeting the criterion at baseline and meeting criterion post-baseline. The criterion included: heart rate- decrease from baseline \> 25% and to a value \< 50 and increase from baseline \> 25% and to a value \> 100. QT interval- new \> 450 (millisecond) msec, new \> 480 msec, new \> 500 msec, increase from baseline \> 30 msec and increase from baseline \> 60 msec. QTcF- new \> 450 msec, new \> 480 msec, new \> 500 msec, increase from baseline \> 30 msec and increase from baseline \> 60 msec.
Query!
Timepoint [61]
0
0
From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [62]
0
0
Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shift in Visual Acuity Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Score
Query!
Assessment method [62]
0
0
Visual acuity was measured using the Snellen visual acuity conversion chart. This was determined by establishing the smallest optotypes that could be identified correctly by the participant at a given observation distance. Snellen visual acuity was reported as a Snellen fraction (m/M) in which the numerator (m) indicated the test distance and the denominator (M) indicated the distance at which the gap of the equivalent Landolt ring subtends 1 minute of arc. The LogMAR score was calculated as - log(m/M). The maximum increase in score of \<= 0, 0 to \< 0.1, 0.1 to \< 0.2, 0.2 to \< 0.3 and \>=0.3 relative to baseline in LogMAR were reported in this endpoint.
Query!
Timepoint [62]
0
0
From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [63]
0
0
Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shifts in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) From Baseline to Maximum Grade On-treatment
Query!
Assessment method [63]
0
0
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) abnormalities were defined according to CTCAE version 4.03 where Grade 0: Non-missing value below Grade 2, Grade 2: LVEF between 40% and 50% or absolute change from baseline between -10% and \< -20%, Grade 3: LVEF between 20% and 39% or absolute change from baseline \<= -20%, Grade 4: LVEF lower than 20%. Categories with at least 1 non-zero data values showing any shift in Grade from baseline to 1 day after dose 1 (post-baseline) were reported. Participants whose grade category was unchanged (e.g. Grade 0 to Grade 0) were not reported.
Query!
Timepoint [63]
0
0
From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Key
* Age = 18 years at time of informed consent
* Histologically- or cytologically-confirmed CRC that is metastatic
* Presence of BRAFV600E in tumor tissue as previously determined by a local assay at any time prior to Screening or by the central laboratory
* Progression of disease after 1 or 2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting
* Evidence of measurable or evaluable non-measurable disease per RECIST, v1.1
* Adequate bone marrow, cardiac, kidney and liver function
* Able to take oral medications
* Female patients are either postmenopausal for at least 1 year, are surgically sterile for at least 6 weeks, or must agree to take appropriate precautions to avoid pregnancy from screening through follow-up if of childbearing potential
* Males must agree to take appropriate precautions to avoid fathering a child from screening through follow-up
Key
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Prior treatment with any RAF inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, cetuximab, panitumumab or other epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors
* Prior irinotecan hypersensitivity or toxicity that would suggest an inability to tolerate irinotecan 180 mg/m2 every 2 weeks
* Symptomatic brain metastasis or leptomeningeal disease
* History or current evidence of retinal vein occlusion or current risk factors for retinal vein occlusion (e.g., uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular hypertension, history of hyperviscosity or hypercoagulability syndromes)
* Known history of acute or chronic pancreatitis
* History of chronic inflammatory bowel disease or Crohn's disease requiring medical intervention (immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive medications or surgery) =12 months prior to randomization
* Uncontrolled blood pressure despite medical treatment
* Impaired GI function or disease that may significantly alter the absorption of encorafenib or binimetinib (e.g., ulcerative diseases, uncontrolled vomiting, malabsorption syndrome, small bowel resection with decreased intestinal absorption)
* Concurrent or previous other malignancy within 5 years of study entry, except cured basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, prostate intraepithelial neoplasm, carcinoma in-situ of the cervix, or other noninvasive or indolent malignancy
* History of thromboembolic or cerebrovascular events = 6 months prior to starting study treatment, including transient ischemic attacks, cerebrovascular accidents, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary emboli
* Concurrent neuromuscular disorder that is associated with the potential of elevated creatine (phosphor)kinase (CK) (e.g., inflammatory myopathies, muscular dystrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy)
* Residual common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) = Grade 2 toxicity from any prior anticancer therapy, with the exception of Grade 2 alopecia or Grade 2 neuropathy
* Known history of HIV infection
* Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection
* Known history of Gilbert's syndrome
* Known contraindication to receive cetuximab or irinotecan at the planned doses
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Other
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
13/10/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
10/11/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
702
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NEW South Wales (nsw)QLD,SA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
St Vincent's Clinic - Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney - Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Marsden Eye Specialists - Parramatta
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Newcastle Eye Centre - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Mater Misericordiae Limited - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Central Adelaide Local Health Network Inc. operating as Royal Adelaide Hospital - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Flinders Medical Centre - Bedford Park
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Central Adelaide Local Health Network Inc. operating as The Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woodville South
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
0
0
Monash Health Translation Precinct - Monash Health - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [10]
0
0
Austin Health - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [11]
0
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2010 - Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2150 - Parramatta
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
2300 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
4101 - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
5000 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
5042 - Bedford Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
5011 - Woodville South
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
3168 - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
0
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
0
0
3000 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
LA Pampa
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Tucumán
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
La Rioja
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Oberoesterreich
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Wien
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Luxembourg
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
WEST Vlaanderen
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Bonheiden
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Charleroi
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Edegem
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Liege
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Roeselaere
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Verviers
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Bahia
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
ES
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Minas Gerais
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
RS
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
SAO Paulo
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
SC
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
SP
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
São Paulo
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Region DE LA Araucania
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
V Region Valparaiso
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Hradec Kralove
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Olomouc
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Odense C
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Besancon Cedex
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
BREST Cedex
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Ecully
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Lyon Cedex 08
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Montpellier Cedex 5
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Nantes Cedex
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Paris Cedex 12
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Reims Cedex
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Saint Jeand De Vedas
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Toulouse Cedex 9
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Toulouse
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Villejuif Cedex
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Baden-wuerttemberg
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Bayern
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Brandenburg
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Niedersachsen
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Nordrhein-westfalen
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
North Rhine Westfalia
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Rheinland-pfalz
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Zala
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Pecs
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
NAP
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Ashkelon
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Be'er-Sheva
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Bnei Brak
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Jerusalem
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Kfar Saba
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Petah Tikva
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Tel-Hashomer
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Ancona
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Bergamo
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
BG
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Cagliari
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
CR
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Milan
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
MI
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
PD
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Bologna
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Firenze
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Modena
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Pisa
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Aichi
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Chiba
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Ishikawa
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Kanagawa
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Gyeonggi-do
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Gyeonggido
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Jeollanam-do
Query!
Country [118]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [118]
0
0
Seoul Teugbyeolsi
Query!
Country [119]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [119]
0
0
Busan
Query!
Country [120]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [120]
0
0
Incheon
Query!
Country [121]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [121]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [122]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [122]
0
0
Ciudad DE Mexico
Query!
Country [123]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [123]
0
0
Cuauhtemoc
Query!
Country [124]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [124]
0
0
Gelderland
Query!
Country [125]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [125]
0
0
Limburg
Query!
Country [126]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [126]
0
0
Noord-holland
Query!
Country [127]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [127]
0
0
Zuid-holland
Query!
Country [128]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [128]
0
0
Utrecht
Query!
Country [129]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [129]
0
0
Lommedalen
Query!
Country [130]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [130]
0
0
Oslo
Query!
Country [131]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [131]
0
0
Brzozow
Query!
Country [132]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [132]
0
0
Elblag
Query!
Country [133]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [133]
0
0
Krakow
Query!
Country [134]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [134]
0
0
Otwock
Query!
Country [135]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [135]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [136]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [136]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [137]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [137]
0
0
Kursk Region
Query!
Country [138]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [138]
0
0
Chelyabinsk
Query!
Country [139]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [139]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [140]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [140]
0
0
Obninsk
Query!
Country [141]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [141]
0
0
Sankt-Petersburg
Query!
Country [142]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [142]
0
0
Andalucia
Query!
Country [143]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [143]
0
0
Baleares
Query!
Country [144]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [144]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [145]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [145]
0
0
Cordona
Query!
Country [146]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [146]
0
0
Madrid, Communidad Delaware
Query!
Country [147]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [147]
0
0
Tarragona
Query!
Country [148]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [148]
0
0
Burgos
Query!
Country [149]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [149]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [150]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [150]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [151]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [151]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [152]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [152]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [153]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [153]
0
0
Zaragoza
Query!
Country [154]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [154]
0
0
Changhua County
Query!
Country [155]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [155]
0
0
Kaohsiung
Query!
Country [156]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [156]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [157]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [157]
0
0
Tainan
Query!
Country [158]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [158]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [159]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [159]
0
0
Taoyuan city
Query!
Country [160]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [160]
0
0
Bornova
Query!
Country [161]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [161]
0
0
Izmir, Karsiyaka
Query!
Country [162]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [162]
0
0
Kadikoy
Query!
Country [163]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [163]
0
0
Ankara
Query!
Country [164]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [164]
0
0
Bursa
Query!
Country [165]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [165]
0
0
Edirne
Query!
Country [166]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [166]
0
0
Malatya
Query!
Country [167]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [167]
0
0
Dnipropetrovska Oblast'
Query!
Country [168]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [168]
0
0
Kyivska Oblast'
Query!
Country [169]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [169]
0
0
Kyivska Oblast
Query!
Country [170]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [170]
0
0
Vinnyts'ka Oblast'
Query!
Country [171]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [171]
0
0
Zakarpats'ka Oblast'
Query!
Country [172]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [172]
0
0
Zakarpatska Oblast
Query!
Country [173]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [173]
0
0
Aberdeenshire Scotland
Query!
Country [174]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [174]
0
0
Berkshire
Query!
Country [175]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [175]
0
0
Glasglow City, Scotland
Query!
Country [176]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [176]
0
0
WEST Midlands
Query!
Country [177]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [177]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [178]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [178]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Pfizer
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [2]
0
0
Pierre Fabre Medicament
Query!
Address [2]
0
0
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [3]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [3]
0
0
Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd
Query!
Address [3]
0
0
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, 3-arm Phase 3 study to evaluate encorafenib + cetuximab plus or minus binimetinib versus Investigator's choice of either irinotecan/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab, as controls, in patients with BRAFV600E mCRC whose disease has progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting. The study contains a Safety Lead-in Phase in which the safety and tolerability of encorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximab will be assessed prior to the Phase 3 portion of the study.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02928224
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Stintzing S, Seufferlein T, Rose C, Reichenbach F, Luftner D. Encorafenib in Combination With Cetuximab After Systemic Therapy in Patients With BRAFV600E Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: German Health Technology Assessment-Driven Analyses From the BEACON CRC Study. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2022 Sep;21(3):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 May 5. Kopetz S, Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Yaeger R, Wasan H, Yoshino T, Desai J, Ciardiello F, Loupakis F, Hong YS, Steeghs N, Guren TK, Arkenau HT, Garcia-Alfonso P, Belani A, Zhang X, Tabernero J. Quality of life with encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib treatment in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes from BEACON CRC. ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100477. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100477. Epub 2022 May 30. Tabernero J, Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Yaeger R, Wasan H, Yoshino T, Desai J, Ciardiello F, Loupakis F, Hong YS, Steeghs N, Guren TK, Arkenau HT, Garcia-Alfonso P, Elez E, Gollerkeri A, Maharry K, Christy-Bittel J, Kopetz S. Encorafenib Plus Cetuximab as a New Standard of Care for Previously Treated BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Updated Survival Results and Subgroup Analyses from the BEACON Study. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 1;39(4):273-284. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02088. Kopetz S, Grothey A, Yaeger R, Van Cutsem E, Desai J, Yoshino T, Wasan H, Ciardiello F, Loupakis F, Hong YS, Steeghs N, Guren TK, Arkenau HT, Garcia-Alfonso P, Pfeiffer P, Orlov S, Lonardi S, Elez E, Kim TW, Schellens JHM, Guo C, Krishnan A, Dekervel J, Morris V, Calvo Ferrandiz A, Tarpgaard LS, Braun M, Gollerkeri A, Keir C, Maharry K, Pickard M, Christy-Bittel J, Anderson L, Sandor V, Tabernero J. Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab in BRAF V600E-Mutated Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1632-1643. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908075. Epub 2019 Sep 30. Van Cutsem E, Huijberts S, Grothey A, Yaeger R, Cuyle PJ, Elez E, Fakih M, Montagut C, Peeters M, Yoshino T, Wasan H, Desai J, Ciardiello F, Gollerkeri A, Christy-Bittel J, Maharry K, Sandor V, Schellens JHM, Kopetz S, Tabernero J. Binimetinib, Encorafenib, and Cetuximab Triplet Therapy for Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Safety Lead-In Results From the Phase III BEACON Colorectal Cancer Study. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 10;37(17):1460-1469. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02459. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Query!
Address
0
0
Pfizer
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Query!
Available to whom?
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/24/NCT02928224/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/24/NCT02928224/SAP_002.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02928224