Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03104374
Registration number
NCT03104374
Ethics application status
Date submitted
4/04/2017
Date registered
7/04/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Have a History of Inadequate Response to at Least One Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (bDMARD)
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Have a History of Inadequate Response to at Least One Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (bDMARD) - SELECT - PsA 2
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2016-004152-30
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
M15-554
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
SELECT - PsA 2
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Psoriatic Arthritis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Rheumatoid arthritis
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Upadacitinib
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Experimental: Upadacitinib 15 mg - Period 1: Participants receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for 56 weeks.
Period 2: Participants will continue to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily.
Experimental: Upadacitinib 30 mg - Period 1: Participants receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for 56 weeks.
Period 2: Participants will continue to receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily.
Placebo comparator: Placebo then Upadacitinib 15 mg - Period 1: Participants receive placebo once daily for 24 weeks followed by upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for 32 weeks.
Period 2: Participants will continue to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily.
Placebo comparator: Placebo then Upadacitinib 30 mg - Period 1: Participants receive placebo once daily for 24 weeks followed by upadacitinib 30 mg once daily for 32 weeks.
Period 2: Participants will continue to receive upadacitinib 30 mg once daily.
Treatment: Drugs: Upadacitinib
Oral tablet
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Oral tablet
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria:
1. = 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count;
2. = 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and
3. = 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
* Physician global assessment of disease activity
* Patient global assessment of disease activity
* Patient assessment of pain
* Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
* High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability.
A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Static Investigator Global Assessment (sIGA) of Psoriasis of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline (sIGA 0/1) at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The sIGA is a 5 point scale ranging from 0 to 4, based on the investigator's assessment of the average elevation, erythema, and scaling of all psoriatic lesions at the current visit. A lower score indicates less severe psoriasis (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline and Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
PASI is a composite score based on the percentage of the body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis and the intensity of erythema (reddening), induration (thickening or hardening of the skin), and desquamation (peeling of the skin) of lesions assessed at 4 anatomic sites (head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities). At each location, the percentage of BSA involvement is assigned a score from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and erythema, induration, and desquamation are scored on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (very marked).
The PASI score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline and Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health).
The physical component score is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The PCS was calculated using norm-based scoring so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life; a positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire is a self-administered patient questionnaire that consists of 13 questions designed to measure the degree of fatigue experienced by participants in the previous 7 days, including physical fatigue (e.g., I feel tired), functional fatigue (e.g., trouble finishing things), emotional fatigue (e.g., frustration), and social consequences of fatigue (e.g., limits social activity). Participants respond to the questions on a scale from 0 'not at all' to 4 'very much'. The FACIT Fatigue score is computed by summing the item scores, after reversing those items that are worded in the negative direction. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges from 0 to 52, where higher scores represent less fatigue. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
A participant was classified as achieving MDA if 5 of the following 7 criteria were met:
* Tender joint count (out of 68 joints) = 1
* Swollen joint count (out of 66 joints) = 1
* PASI score = 1 (score ranges from 0 - 72) or percent BSA involved with psoriasis = 3%
* Patient's assessment of pain = 1.5 (NRS from 0 to 10)
* Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity = 2 (NRS from 0 to 10)
* HAQ-DI score = 0.5 (index score ranges from 0 to 3)
* Leeds Enthesitis Index = 1 (assesses the presence or absence of enthesitis at 3 bilateral sites, with an overall score range from 0 to 6)
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Self-Assessment of Psoriasis Symptoms (SAPS) Score at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The SAPS is an 11-item self-assessment of psoriasis symptoms that includes questions on: pain, itching, redness, scaling, flaking, bleeding, burning, stinging, tenderness, pain due to skin cracking, and joint pain. Each item is scored from 0 to 10, with 0 being least severe and 10 being most severe. The total score is generated by summing the 11 items and ranges from 0 to 110 (worst). A negative change from Baseline in the total score indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline and Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria:
1. = 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count;
2. = 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and
3. = 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
* Physician global assessment of disease activity
* Patient global assessment of disease activity
* Patient assessment of pain
* Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
* High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria:
1. = 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count;
2. = 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and
3. = 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
* Physician global assessment of disease activity
* Patient global assessment of disease activity
* Patient assessment of pain
* Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
* High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 2
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria:
1. = 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count;
2. = 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and
3. = 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
* Physician global assessment of disease activity
* Patient global assessment of disease activity
* Patient assessment of pain
* Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
* High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline and Week 2
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of PsA with symptom onset at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit and fulfillment of the Classification Criteria for PsA (CASPAR) criteria
* Participant has active disease at Baseline defined as >= 3 tender joints (based on 68 joint counts) and >= 3 swollen joints (based on 66 joint counts) at Screening and Baseline Visits
* Diagnosis of active plaque psoriasis or documented history of plaque psoriasis
* Participant has had an inadequate response (lack of efficacy after a minimum 12 week duration of therapy) or intolerance to treatment with at least 1 bDMARD.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Prior exposure to any Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor (including but not limited to ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, baricitinib, and filgotinib)
* Current treatment with > 2 non-biologic DMARDs or use of DMARDs other than methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), leflunomide (LEF), apremilast, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), bucillamine or iguratimod or use of MTX in combination with LEF at Baseline.
* History of fibromyalgia, any arthritis with onset prior to age 17 years, or current diagnosis of inflammatory joint disease other than PsA (including, but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, gout, overlap connective tissue diseases, scleroderma, polymyositis, dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus). Prior history of reactive arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis is permitted if documentation of change in diagnosis to PsA or additional diagnosis of PsA is made. Prior history of fibromyalgia is permitted if documentation of change in diagnosis to PsA or documentation that the diagnosis of fibromyalgia was made incorrectly.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/05/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
30/09/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
642
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
North Dakota
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Oost-Vlaanderen
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Genk
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Goias
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Minas Gerais
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Rio Grande Do Sul
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Sao Paulo
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Manitoba
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Providencia
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Santiago
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Vitacura Santiago
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Bruntál
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Uherské Hradište
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Bouches-du-Rhone
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Occitanie
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Tours
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Attiki
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Athens
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Szolnok
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Veszprem
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Emilia-Romagna
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Marche
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Catania
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Milan
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Aichi
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Mie
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Miyagi
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Oita
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Nagoya
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Rotterdam
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Waikato
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Nelson
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Timaru
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Lisboa
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Porto
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Viana Do Castelo
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Puerto Rico
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Ponce
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Puerto Rico
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
San Juan
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
A Coruna
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Murcia
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Bath And North East Somerset
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
London, City Of
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Luton
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
AbbVie
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The study objectives of Period 1 are to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) and 30 mg QD versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms in adults with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD). The objective of Period 2 is to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg QD and 30 mg QD in participants who have completed Period 1.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03104374
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Mease PJ, Lertratanakul A, Anderson JK, Papp K, Van den Bosch F, Tsuji S, Dokoupilova E, Keiserman M, Wang X, Zhong S, McCaskill RM, Zueger P, Pangan AL, Tillett W. Upadacitinib for psoriatic arthritis refractory to biologics: SELECT-PsA 2. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Mar;80(3):312-320. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218870. Epub 2020 Dec 3. Mease P, Kavanaugh A, Gladman D, FitzGerald O, Soriano ER, Nash P, Feng D, Lertratanakul A, Douglas K, Lippe R, Gossec L. Disease Control with Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled SELECT-PsA 1 and 2 Phase 3 Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Aug;9(4):1181-1191. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00449-6. Epub 2022 May 23. Burmester GR, Winthrop K, Blanco R, Nash P, Goupille P, Azevedo VF, Salvarani C, Rubbert-Roth A, Lesser E, Lippe R, Lertratanakul A, Mccaskill RM, Liu J, Ruderman EM. Safety Profile of Upadacitinib up to 3 Years in Psoriatic Arthritis: An Integrated Analysis of Two Pivotal Phase 3 Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Apr;9(2):521-539. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00410-z. Epub 2021 Dec 30. Nash P, Richette P, Gossec L, Marchesoni A, Ritchlin C, Kato K, McDearmon-Blondell EL, Lesser E, McCaskill R, Feng D, Anderson JK, Ruderman EM. Upadacitinib as monotherapy and in combination with non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 3;61(8):3257-3268. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab905. Strand V, Van den Bosch F, Ranza R, Leung YY, Drescher E, Zueger P, Saffore CD, Lertratanakul A, Lippe R, Nash P. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients with an Inadequate Response to Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: SELECT-PsA 2. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Dec;8(4):1827-1844. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00377-x. Epub 2021 Oct 18. Muensterman E, Engelhardt B, Gopalakrishnan S, Anderson JK, Mohamed MF. Upadacitinib pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses of efficacy and safety in psoriatic arthritis patients - Analyses of phase III clinical trials. Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Jan;15(1):267-278. doi: 10.1111/cts.13146. Epub 2021 Oct 27. Mease PJ, Lertratanakul A, Papp KA, van den Bosch FE, Tsuji S, Dokoupilova E, Keiserman MW, Bu X, Chen L, McCaskill RM, Zueger P, McDearmon-Blondell EL, Pangan AL, Tillett W. Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Biologics: 56-Week Data from the Randomized Controlled Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 Study. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Jun;8(2):903-919. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00305-z. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
AbbVie Inc.
Query!
Address
0
0
AbbVie
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Data requests can be submitted at any time and the data will be accessible for 12 months, with possible extensions considered.
Query!
Available to whom?
Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous, independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://www.abbvie.com/our-science/clinical-trials/clinical-trials-data-and-information-sharing/data-and-information-sharing-with-qualified-researchers.html
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/74/NCT03104374/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/74/NCT03104374/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Mease PJ, Lertratanakul A, Anderson JK, Papp K, Va...
[
More Details
]
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03104374