Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03409107
Registration number
NCT03409107
Ethics application status
Date submitted
8/01/2018
Date registered
24/01/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
Anemia Studies in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Erythropoiesis Via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor (PHI) Daprodustat in Non-Dialysis Subjects Evaluating Hemoglobin (Hgb) and Quality of Life (ASCEND-NHQ)
Query!
Scientific title
A 28-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-center, Study in Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (rhEPO) naïve Non-dialysis Participants With Anemia Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Effects on Quality of Life of Daprodustat Compared to Placebo
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2017-002270-39
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
205270
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anaemia
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Renal and Urogenital
0
0
0
0
Query!
Kidney disease
Query!
Renal and Urogenital
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other renal and urogenital disorders
Query!
Blood
0
0
0
0
Query!
Anaemia
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Daprodustat (GSK1278863)
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Treatment: Drugs - Iron therapy
Experimental: Daprodustat receivers - Participants will receive oral daprodustat once daily
Placebo comparator: Placebo receivers - Participants will receive oral placebo once daily
Treatment: Drugs: Daprodustat (GSK1278863)
Daprodustat will be available as 9 millimeter (mm) or 7 mm film-coated tablets. Daprodustat will be administered once daily via oral route and can be taken without regard to food.
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Daprodustat matching placebo will be available as 9 mm or 7 mm film coated tablets. Placebo will be administered once daily via oral route and can be taken without regard to food.
Treatment: Drugs: Iron therapy
Iron therapy will be administered if ferritin is \<50 Nano gram per milliliter and/or TSAT is \<15 percent.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Mean Change in Hemoglobin From Baseline and Over the Evaluation Period (Mean Over Week 24 and 28)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Blood samples were collected at given time points from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Evaluation period hemoglobin value was defined as the mean of all available post-randomization hemoglobin values (on and off-treatment) during the evaluation period (Week 24 to Week 28 inclusive). For the primary analysis, the missing post-Baseline hemoglobin values were imputed using pre-specified multiple imputations. Change from Baseline was defined as the average of post-randomization values during the evaluation period minus Baseline value. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date. Analysis was performed using the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with terms for treatment, Baseline hemoglobin, and region.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 to Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Increase of >=1.0 Grams Per Deciliter From Baseline to Evaluation Period
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Blood samples were collected at given time points for hemoglobin measurements. Evaluation period hemoglobin value was defined as the mean of all available post-randomization hemoglobin values (on and off-treatment) during the evaluation period (Week 24 to Week 28 inclusive). For the primary analysis, the missing post-Baseline hemoglobin values were imputed using pre-specified multiple imputations. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date. Percentage of participants with hemoglobin increase of \>=1.0 grams per deciliter from Baseline to evaluation period was analyzed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi-squared test. The percentage values presented has been rounded off.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 to Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire Vitality Domain Score by Traditional Scoring at Week 28
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the 8 health domains: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), Social Functioning, Bodily Pain, Mental Health, Role-Emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), Vitality, and General Perception of Health.Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). Vitality domain score ranges from 0-100; higher score indicates a better health state \& better functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as Post-Dose Visit Value at Week 28 minus Baseline. For primary analysis, the missing on-treatment Week 28 SF-36 Vitality domain scores were imputed using pre-specified multiple imputations. Baseline value was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, Baseline score, and region.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Hgb Response (Hgb in the 11-12 Grams/Deciliter Range) During Evaluation Period (Week 24 to Week 28 Inclusive)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all evaluable hemoglobin values during the evaluation period (Week 24 to Week 28 inclusive) including any evaluable unscheduled hemoglobin values that were taken during this period. Percentage of participants with Hgb response was defined as participants with mean Hgb within range (11-12 grams per deciliter during the evaluation period (Week 24 to Week 28 inclusive) and it was analyzed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi-squared test. The percentage values presented has been rounded off.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Week 24 to Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Time With Hgb Within the Target Range (11-12 Grams Per Deciliter) During Evaluation Period (Week 24 to Week 28 Inclusive) (Hodges-Lehmann Estimate)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Percentage of days for which participant's Hgb was within the target range of 11-12 grams per deciliter during the evaluation period (Week 24 to Week 28 inclusive), including any unscheduled evaluable Hgb values that were taken during this time period. Percentage of time for which Hgb was within the target range (11-12 grams per deciliter) for a participant was calculated by dividing 'the total number of days that Hgb was within range during Week 24 to 28' by 'the total number of days the participant remained on treatment during Week 24 to 28'.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Week 24 to Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Time With Hgb Within the Target Range (11-12 Grams Per Deciliter) During Evaluation Period (Week 24 to Week 28 Inclusive) (Mann-Whitney Estimate)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Percentage of days for which participant's Hgb was within the target range of 11-12 grams per deciliter during the evaluation period (Week 24 to Week 28 inclusive), including any unscheduled evaluable Hgb values that were taken during this time period. Percentage of time for which Hgb was within the target range (11-12 grams per deciliter) for a participant was calculated by dividing 'the total number of days that Hgb was within range during Week 24 to 28' by 'the total number of days the participant remained on treatment during Week 24 to 28'
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Week 24 to Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Post-randomization Hgb at Week 28
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Blood samples were collected at given time points for hemoglobin measurements. Change from Baseline in Hgb was analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) approach. Change from Baseline was calculated as Post-dose visit value minus Baseline. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Rate of Participants Permanently Stopping Randomized Treatment Due to Meeting Rescue Criteria
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The incidence rate of participants permanently stopping randomized treatment due to meeting rescue criteria is presented.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Up to Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline by Domain and Single Item Scores on the Chronic Kidney Disease -Anemia Questionnaire (CKD-AQ) Symptom Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
CKD-AQ is 21-item patient reported outcomes measure assessing symptoms \& symptom impact in participants with anemia associated with CKD.CKD-AQ identified 3 domains:1.Tired/Low Energy/Weak scale consisting of ten items;2.Chest Pain/Shortness of Breath scale consisting of four items and 3.Cognitive scale consisting of three items;Single items included: 4.Difficulty Sleeping;5.Difficulty Standing for long periods of time;6.Severity-Shortness of breath while sitting/resting;7.Time with Shortness of breath while not doing activity.Single-item measures were recorded based on 0-100 scoring with 0 is worst possible \& 100 is best possible score.Total domain score is calculated as average of items in each domain \& ranged from 0-100 where 0 is worst possible and 100 is best possible score.Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline.Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Adjusted mean \& standard error is presented.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of disease severity on a 5-point disease severity scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, or 4=very severe). A higher score indicated worse outcome. Change from Baseline was calculated as Post-Dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Functioning Domain
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following eight health domains: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), vitality, and general perception of health. Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). Physical functioning domain score ranges from 0-100; higher score indicates a better health state and better functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline of the SF-36 Individual Items in the Vitality Domain
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following eight health domains: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), vitality, and general perception of health. Individual vitality items include: 1. Did you feel full of life?, 2. Did you have a lot of energy?, 3. Did you feel worn out?, 4. Did you feel tired?. Score of each item in the vitality domain ranges from 0-100; higher score indicates better health state and better functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Number of Participants Currently Employed as Per Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Anemic Symptoms Clinical Practice Version (WPAI-ANS-CPV)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
WPAI-ANS-CPV is anemia specific questionnaire designed as self-reported quantitative assessment of social functioning related to work and regular daily activities. It contains 2 concepts-work productivity impairment measured via absenteeism(time missed from work), presenteeism(impairment at work) and regular daily activity impairment. WPAI questions (Q) were:1) currently employed,2) work time missed due to problem, 3) impairment while working due to problem, 4) overall work impairment due to problem, 5) activity impairment due to problem. WPAI generates 4 domain scores:percent (%) of work time missed(absenteeism),% of impairment while working(presenteeism),% of overall work impairment(absenteeism and presenteeism combined),% of activity impairment. Number of participants currently employed as per WPAI-ANS-CPV is presented.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Week 8, Week 12 and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline in WPAI-ANS-CPV: Percent Time Missed From Work
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
WPAI-ANS-CPV is anemia specific questionnaire designed as self-reported quantitative assessment of social functioning related to work and regular daily activities. It contains 2 concepts-work productivity impairment measured via absenteeism (time missed from work), presenteeism (impairment at work) and regular daily activity impairment. WPAI questions (Q) were: 1) currently employed, 2) work time missed due to problem, 3) impairment while working due to problem, 4)overall work impairment due to problem, 5) activity impairment due to problem. Percent work time missed due to problem was a subscale and calculated as: Q2/(Q2+Q4) for those who were currently employed. Subscale score was expressed as an impairment percentage (range: 0-100%) where higher numbers indicate greater impairment and less productivity. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, Week 12 and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline in WPAI-ANS-CPV: Mean Hours Missed From Work in the Past 7 Days
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
WPAI-ANS-CPV is anemia specific questionnaire designed as self-reported quantitative assessment of social functioning related to work and regular daily activities. It contains 2 concepts-work productivity impairment measured via absenteeism (time missed from work), presenteeism (impairment at work) and regular daily activity impairment. WPAI Qs were: 1) currently employed, 2) work time missed due to problem, 3) impairment while working due to problem, 4) overall work impairment due to problem, 5) activity impairment due to problem. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, Week 12 and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline in WPAI: Percent Impairment at Work
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
WPAI-ANS-CPV is anemia specific questionnaire designed as self-reported quantitative assessment of social functioning related to work and regular daily activities.It contains 2 concepts-work productivity impairment measured via absenteeism(time missed from work),presenteeism(impairment at work) and regular daily activity impairment.WPAI Qs were:1)currently employed,2)work time missed due to problem,3)impairment while working due to problem,4)overall work impairment due to problem,5)activity impairment due to problem. % Impairment while Working due to Problem was subscale and calculated as: Q5/10 for those who were currently employed and actually worked in past 7 days. Subscale score was expressed as an impairment percentage (range: 0-100%) where higher numbers indicate greater impairment and less productivity. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, Week 12 and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline in WPAI: Percent Overall Work Impairment
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
WPAI-ANS-CPV is anemia specific questionnaire designed as self-reported quantitative assessment of social functioning related to work and regular daily activities. It contains 2 concepts-work productivity impairment measured via absenteeism (time missed from work), presenteeism (impairment at work) and regular daily activity impairment. WPAI Qs were: 1) currently employed, 2) work time missed due to problem, 3) impairment while working due to problem, 4) overall work impairment due to problem, 5) activity impairment due to problem. Percent overall work impairment due to problem was a subscale and calculated as: Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-Q2/(Q2+Q4))×(Q5/10)\] for those who were currently employed. Subscale score was expressed as an impairment percentage (range: 0-100%) where higher numbers indicate greater impairment. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, Week 12 and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline in WPAI: Percent Regular Daily Activity Impairment
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
WPAI-ANS-CPV is anemia specific questionnaire designed as self-reported quantitative assessment of social functioning related to work and regular daily activities.It contains 2 concepts-work productivity impairment measured via absenteeism (time missed from work), presenteeism (impairment at work) and regular daily activity impairment. WPAI Qs were: 1) currently employed, 2) work time missed due to problem, 3) impairment while working due to problem, 4) overall work impairment due to problem, 5) activity impairment due to problem. Percent activity impairment due to problem was a subscale and calculated as: Q5/10 for all respondents. Subscale score was expressed as an impairment percentage (range: 0-100%) where higher numbers indicate greater impairment. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1), Week 8, Week 12 and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Health Utility Index (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-assessment questionnaire, consisting of 5 items covering 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension is measured by a 5-point Likert scale (1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, and 5: extreme problems). The responses for the five dimension together form a five-figure description of health state. Each of these five-figure health states have attached valuation (utility score), expressed as single index on a scale from 0-1, where 1 is full health and 0 is worst health. The higher the score the better the health status. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labeled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine' at the time of completion. It is a self-assessment visual analogue scale, ranging from 0=worst imaginable to 100=best. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) at Week 28
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
SBP, DBP and MAP were measured with participants in a seated position after at least a 5-minute of rest. MAP is the average BP in an individual's arteries during a single cardiac cycle. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Blood Pressure (BP) Exacerbation Event
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Percentage of participants with at least one BP event is presented. BP exacerbation is defined as: SBP exacerbation: SBP \>= 25 mmHg increase from Baseline or SBP \>= 180 mmHg; DBP exacerbation: DBP \>= 15 mmHg increase from Baseline or DBP \>= 110 mmHg. Percentage of participants with at least one BP event is presented. The percentage values presented has been rounded off.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Up to Week 28
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* >=18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.
* Have CKD, confirmed at screening: Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) CKD stages 3, 4, or 5 defined by Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula.
* Participants with Stable HemoCue Hgb from 8.5 to 10.5 at screening visit (Week -4) and from 8.5 to 10.0 g/dL at randomization (Day 1).
* Participants may receive up to one intravenous (IV) iron dose within the 8 weeks prior to screening and NO IV iron use between screening visit and randomization (Day 1).
* If needed, participant may be on stable maintenance oral iron supplementation. There should be <50% change in overall dose and no change in type of iron prescribed in the 4 weeks prior to Day 1 randomization visit.
* Male and female participants are eligible. A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) or WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance during the treatment period and for at least 4 weeks after the last dose of study treatment.
* Capable of giving signed informed consent.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Participants who are on dialysis or clinical evidence of impending need to initiate dialysis within 180 days after randomization (Day 1).
* Planned living-related or living-unrelated kidney transplant within 28 weeks after randomization (Day 1).
* Transferrin saturation (TSAT) <15 percent (Screening only).
* Ferritin <50 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Screening only).
* History of rhEPO or rhEPO analogue use within the 8 weeks prior to screening and rhEPO use between screening and randomization (Day 1).
* History of transfusion within the 8 weeks prior to screening and transfusion between screening and randomization (Day 1).
* History of bone marrow aplasia or pure red cell aplasia (PRCA).
* Participants with Megaloblastic anemia (untreated pernicious anemia and folate deficiency), thalassemia major, sickle cell disease or myelodysplastic syndrome.
* Evidence of actively bleeding gastric, duodenal, or esophageal ulcer disease or clinically significant gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding <= 8 weeks prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
* History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to excipients in the investigational product.
* Use of strong inhibitor of CYP2C8 (for example, gemfibrozil) or strong inducers of CYP2C8 (for example, rifampin/rifampicin).
* Ferric citrate use within 4 weeks prior to randomization (Day 1).
* Use of other investigational agent or device prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
* Any prior treatment with daprodustat for a treatment duration of >30 days.
* MI or acute coronary syndrome within the 8 weeks prior to screening through to randomization. (Day 1).
* Stroke or transient ischemic attack within the 8 weeks prior to screening through to randomization. (Day 1).
* Chronic Class IV heart failure, as defined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system.
* QT interval corrected by Bazett's formula (QTcB) >500 milliseconds (msec) or QTcB >530 msec in participants with bundle branch block. There is no corrected QT interval (QTc) exclusion for participants with a predominantly paced rhythm.
* Alanine transaminase (ALT) >2x upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening (Week -4).
* Bilirubin >1.5xULN at screening (Week -4).
* Current unstable liver or biliary disease per investigator assessment, generally defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis.
* History of malignancy within the 2 years prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1), or currently receiving treatment for cancer, or complex kidney cyst (for example, Bosniak Category II F, III or IV) > 3 centimeters (cm).
* Any other condition, clinical or laboratory abnormality, or examination finding that the investigator considers would put the participant at unacceptable risk, which may affect study compliance or prevent understanding of the aims or investigational procedures or possible consequences of the study.
* Current uncontrolled hypertension as determined by the investigator.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/03/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
7/10/2020
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
614
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Murdoch
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2010 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3050 - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
6150 - Murdoch
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
3065 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Córdova
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Santa Fe
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Bahia
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Espírito Santo
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
São Paulo
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Grenoble cedex 9
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Le Mans cedex 9
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Marseille cedex 5
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Melun
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Mulhouse cedex
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Nantes Cedex 1
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Nice Cedex 1
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Saint-Priest en Jarez
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Calabria
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Campania
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Emilia-Romagna
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Liguria
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Lombardia
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Veneto
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Busan
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Daegu-si
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Daegu
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Gyeonggi-do
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Guanajuato
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Jalisco
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Nuevo León
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Veracruz
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Yucatán
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Guadalajara
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Merida
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Ciechanow
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Krakow
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Olawa
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Pleszew
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Sosnowiec
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Swidnik
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Szczecin
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Tczew
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Brasov
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Bucharest
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Cluj-Napoca
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Craiova
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Deva
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Oradea
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Targu Mures
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Timisoara
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Izhevsk
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Kaliningrad
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Kemerovo
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Krasnoyarsk
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Nizhniy Novgorod
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Pyatigorsk
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Rostov-on-Don
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Ryazan
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Stavropol
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Yaroslavl
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Badalona
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Santiago de Compostela
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Kent
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Derby
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Peterborough
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Plymouth
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Shrewsbury
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Swansea
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
GlaxoSmithKline
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this multi-center study in non-dialysis participants with anemia associated with CKD is to evaluate safety, efficacy and quality of life of daprodustat compared to placebo.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03409107
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Johansen KL, Cobitz AR, Singh AK, Macdougall IC, Lopes RD, Obrador GT, Kovesdy CP, Israni R, Jha V, Okoro T, Sprys M, Jolly S, Lindsay AC, Bhatt P, Camejo RR, Keeley T, Cizman B, Wheeler DC. The ASCEND-NHQ randomized trial found positive effects of daprodustat on hemoglobin and quality of life in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2023 Jun;103(6):1180-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.02.019. Epub 2023 Mar 2. Natale P, Palmer SC, Jaure A, Hodson EM, Ruospo M, Cooper TE, Hahn D, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilisers for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD013751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013751.pub2.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
GSK Clinical Trials
Query!
Address
0
0
GlaxoSmithKline
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data (IPD) and related study documents of the eligible studies via the Data Sharing Portal. Details on GSK's data sharing criteria can be found at: https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/innovation/trials/data-transparency/
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Informed consent form (ICF), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Anonymized IPD is made available within 6 months of publication of primary, key secondary and safety results for studies in product with approved indication(s) or terminated asset(s) across all indications.
Query!
Available to whom?
Anonymized IPD is shared with researchers whose proposals are approved by an Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension may be granted, when justified, for up to 6 months.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/innovation/trials/data-transparency
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/07/NCT03409107/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/07/NCT03409107/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03409107