Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03277378
Registration number
NCT03277378
Ethics application status
Date submitted
4/09/2017
Date registered
11/09/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
Evaluating Anatomic Versus Targeted Lead Placement for Burst Stimulation Therapy During the Trial
Query!
Scientific title
Randomized, Controlled, Single Blind, Prospective, Multicenter Study Evaluating Anatomic Versus Targeted Lead Placement for BurstDR Therapy During the Trial Evaluation Period. (DELIVERY)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
SJM-CIP-10116
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
DELIVERY
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Chronic, Intractable Pain of the Trunk and/or Lower Limbs
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation
Active comparator: Group 1 (AB) - Group 1 (AB): anatomic lead placement followed by BurstDRā¢ stimulation during an initial trial evaluation period
Active comparator: Group 2 (TB) - Group 2 (TB): targeted lead placement followed by BurstDRā¢ stimulation during an initial trial evaluation period
Treatment: Devices: lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation
lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Qualification Rate for Permanent System Implant at the End of the Initial Trial Evaluation Period
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The primary endpoint is the qualification rate for permanent system implant at the end of the initial trial evaluation period.
Qualification for permanent system implant was defined by a composite where all the following conditions were met:
* = 50% patient reported pain relief (PRP) at the end of the trial evaluation
* Trial evaluation period lasted for a minimum of 3 days
* Physician recommends subject for permanent system implant
* Subject reports a willingness to pursue a permanent system implant
Subjects did not qualify for permanent system implant if they met both of the following:
* \< 50% PRP (patient reported pain relief) at the end of the trial evaluation
* Trial evaluation period lasted for a minimum of 5 days
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From pre-implant to end of initial trial evaluation period, 3 to 5 days of BurstDR stimulation
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Rate of Physician Preference for Anatomic Placement Versus Targeted Placement at the End of the Study
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The physician preference for placement of leads was noted by giving them the option of choosing which lead placement technique they preferred - anatomic or targeted lead placement technique.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From pre-implant to end of initial trial evaluation period, 3 to 5 days of BurstDR stimulation
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Patient indicated for Spinal Cord Stimulation therapy in accordance with the approved labeling.
2. Patient's pain profile indicates appropriate lead placement would be at one or more levels from T7 to T10, to achieve pain coverage.
3. Patient has a baseline score on the Numerical Rating Scale =6 over the past 24 hours for 'average overall pain'specific to the area(s) of chronic pain that will be treated with spinal cord stimulation.
4. Patient is considered by the Study Investigator as a candidate for implantation of a spinal cord stimulator system according to the system Instructions for Use.
5. Patient is >18 years of age at the time of enrollment.
6. Patient is willing to adhere to the study requirements, including compliance with and completion of all study visits.
7. Patient has signed and received a copy of the Ethical Committee/Independent Review Board approved informed consent.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Patient currently has a spinal cord stimulation system implanted.
2. Patient has previously failed a spinal cord stimulation therapy (either trial system evaluation or permanent system implant).
3. Patient has a primary diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Angina Pectoris, or Chronic Migraine.
4. Patient is scheduled to undergo an on-the-table trial evaluation (aka all-in-one procedure)
5. Patient is scheduled to be implanted with (a) surgical paddle trial lead(s).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
22/09/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
12/10/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
270
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Frankston Pain Management - Frankston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
North Shore Private Hospital - Saint Leonards
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Frankston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Saint Leonards
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Rhode Island
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
West Virginia
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Graz
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Vienna
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Duisburg
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Düsseldorf
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Gera
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Nürnberg
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Pavia
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Leiderdorp
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Velp
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Uppsala
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Abbott Medical Devices
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Prospective, multi-center, randomized, single blind study
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03277378
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Robyn Capobianco, PhD
Query!
Address
0
0
Abbott
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/78/NCT03277378/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/78/NCT03277378/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03277378