Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12605000506695
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
14/09/2005
Date registered
26/09/2005
Date last updated
27/07/2012
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Improving informed consent to clinical trials: Evaluating a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II).
Query!
Scientific title
Improving informed consent: A randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II).
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
280920
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
IBIS-II DA
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Level of informed consent in women considering joining IBIS-II (i.e. women with DCIS and at elevated risk of breast cancer).
631
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
703
703
0
0
Query!
Breast
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Women considering participation in IBIS-II will be randomised to receive a decision aid (intervention group) or a blank notebook (control group). The decision aid is a booklet containing clear written and graphical information, as well as exercises to help with the process of weighing up the pros and cons of possible risk management options, including joining IBIS-II. Participants usually take approximately 2 weeks to choose whether to take part in IBIS-II, however, they can make such a decision at any point during which the trial is open for recruitment. Participation in the study involves filling out two questionnaires over a 3 month period. The study is expected to conclude mid 2009.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
612
0
None
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Women in the control group will receive a blank notebook.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
856
0
Satisfaction and difficulties with decision making (decisional conflict) measured using the validated Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
856
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
856
0
Assessed immediately after women decide whether to take part in IBIS-II.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
1717
0
General knowledge about clinical trials measured using an adapted form of an existing scale. Understanding and attitudes relating to participation in IBIS-II measured using a scale developed specifically for this study and the Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC-B) scale. Anxiety measured using a short-form of the State-Triat Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
1717
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
1717
0
Assessed immediately after women decide whether to take part in IBIS-II.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
1718
0
Clinician/recruiter attitudes to decision aids measured using a scale developed by Annete O'Connor and her group used to survery Canadian clinicians about a specific DA.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
1718
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
1718
0
Assessed at the end of the decision aid trial. The trial is expected to conclude mid 2009.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
1719
0
c) the effect of the decision aid on patient accrual to, and drop-out from, the IBIS-II trial.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
1719
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
1719
0
Assessed at the end of the decision aid trial.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
8441
0
Decisional regret and satisfaction measured with the Decisional Regret Scale and the Satisfaction with Decision Scales respectively.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
8441
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
8441
0
Assessed 12 weeks after the women have made a deicison whether or not to take pat in IBIS-II.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients who are eligible for the IBIS-II trial will be eligible for the decision aid trial. These are either women at elevated risk of breast cancer, or women who have been treated for DCIS, aged between 40 and 70 years.
Query!
Minimum age
40
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
70
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Insufficient English to read the booklet and complete questionnaires.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computer generated
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Other
Query!
Other design features
Randomised block design
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
22/01/2008
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
400
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
225
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
225
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
778
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
778
0
Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
778
0
5005 LBJ Freeway,
Suite 250
Dallas, TX 75244
Query!
Country [1]
778
0
United States of America
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Medical Psychology Research Unit, University of Sydney
Query!
Address
School of Psychology
Brennan MacCallum Building (A18)
University of Sydney NSW 2006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
644
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
644
0
ANZ BCTG
Query!
Address [1]
644
0
Department of Surgical Oncology
University of Newcastle
Calvary Mater Newcastle
Locked Bag 7
Hunter Region Mail Centre NSW 2310
Query!
Country [1]
644
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
2053
0
University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
2053
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
2053
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
2053
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
2053
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
2053
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
5114
0
Hunter New England HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
5114
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
5114
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
5114
0
Query!
Approval date [2]
5114
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
5114
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [3]
5115
0
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [3]
5115
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [3]
5115
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [3]
5115
0
Query!
Approval date [3]
5115
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [3]
5115
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [4]
5116
0
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [4]
5116
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [4]
5116
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [4]
5116
0
Query!
Approval date [4]
5116
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [4]
5116
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [5]
5117
0
Mental Health Research and Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [5]
5117
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [5]
5117
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [5]
5117
0
Query!
Approval date [5]
5117
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [5]
5117
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [6]
5118
0
Greenslopes Private Hospital HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [6]
5118
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [6]
5118
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [6]
5118
0
Query!
Approval date [6]
5118
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [6]
5118
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [7]
5119
0
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [7]
5119
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [7]
5119
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [7]
5119
0
Query!
Approval date [7]
5119
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [7]
5119
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [8]
5120
0
Northern Y Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [8]
5120
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [8]
5120
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [8]
5120
0
Query!
Approval date [8]
5120
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [8]
5120
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This trial looks at the effectiveness of a 'decision aid' as a means of improving informed consent for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II). Who is it for? You can join this study if you are a woman who has had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or if you have a strong family history of breast cancer, and are considering joining the IBIS-II trial. (This is a study evaluating the role of anastrozole - a drug designed to reduce the hormone oestrogen in the body, in order to reduce the risk of developing invasive breast cancer.) Trial details Participants will be randomly divided into two groups. One group will receive a decision aid plus the standard information sheet, and the other group will receive the standard information sheet alone. The aim of the study is to discover whether a purpose-designed decision aid will increase women's understanding, and make it easier for them to make a decision which fits with their beliefs and values. Standard information includes clear factual information about the disease. A decision aid also provides clear factual information but adds more graphs and pictures and leads the woman through a process of weighing up the pros and cons of trial participation. If this study is successful, decision aids may be used more widely to help people decide whether or not to join a clinical trial.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
36076
0
Query!
Address
36076
0
Query!
Country
36076
0
Query!
Phone
36076
0
Query!
Fax
36076
0
Query!
Email
36076
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
9801
0
Dr Ilona Juraskova
Query!
Address
9801
0
Medical Psychology Research Unit
School of Psychology
University of Sydney
Brennan McCallum Building A18
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
9801
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
9801
0
+61 2 90365275
Query!
Fax
9801
0
+61 2 90365292
Query!
Email
9801
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
729
0
Professor Phyllis Butow
Query!
Address
729
0
Medical Psychology Research Unit
School of Psychology
University of Sydney
Brennan McCallum Building A18
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
729
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
729
0
+61 2 93512859
Query!
Fax
729
0
+61 2 90365292
Query!
Email
729
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF