Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12607000150448
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
27/12/2006
Date registered
1/03/2007
Date last updated
1/03/2007
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Post-operative pain management following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A comparison of inter-scalene block with subacromial bursal infusion
Query!
Scientific title
A prospective randomised control trial comparing post-operative pain relief after shoulder surgery, using regional anaesthesia inter-scalene block, compared with direct shoulder joint anaesthesia using a breg pump following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of the shoulder for those patients with rotator cuff arthropathy
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Rotator cuff tear / arthropathy
1645
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
1755
1755
0
0
Query!
Other anaesthesiology
Query!
Musculoskeletal
1756
1756
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Prospective Randomised Control Trial
Patients undergoing an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by Simon McMahon with the anaesthetic given by John Hyndman at Mercy Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand will be eligible for enrolment in the study
After patients have given there consent to being in the study they will be randomised into Group 1 or 2
Randomisation will occur through a random generated number table
Group 2 (CONTROL): Those who will receive a long-acting inter-scalene block + IV/oral analgesia
Bupivacaine 0.375% 20-30mls (depending patients weight)
After patients have given their consent to being in the study they will be randomised
Patients will be asked to record their level of pain by
1. using a visual analogue scale (VAS) on paper
VAS = visual scale 100mm’s in length with no pain at the left hand side and worst pain ever experienced at the right hand side. Patients will be asked subjectively to place a mark on the line where they feel there level of pain is at there pre-operative assessment, and then 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours post-operation.
Any analgesics consumed at these times will also be recorded
Query!
Intervention code [1]
1367
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Group 1 (COMPARATOR): Those patients who will be receiving a short acting inter-scalene block and subacromial infusion (Breg) pump + IV/oral analgesia
Interscalene block dosage:
lignocaine 1.5% 20-30 mls (depending on patients weight)
Subacromial infusion pump:
50mls 0.25% Bupivicaine
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
2449
0
Level of Pain following surgery
Query!
Assessment method [1]
2449
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
2449
0
Pre-operation, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-operation
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
2450
0
Visual analogue scale
Query!
Assessment method [2]
2450
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
2450
0
Pre-operation, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-operation
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
4216
0
Other medications used
Query!
Assessment method [1]
4216
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
4216
0
Pre-operation, 4, 8 ,12, 24 and 48 hours post-operation.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. All patients with a rotator cuff tear / arthropathy at Mercy Hospital who will2. undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by Simon McMahon 3. be anaesthetised by John Hyndman4. All patients who wish to participate in the study and give consent to being in the study.
Query!
Minimum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
Not stated
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Those patients not able to give consent. Those patients who are sensitive or allergic to the medications given. Those patients who do not wish to participate and/or who do not give consent to being in the study.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation was concealed by central randomisation by phone
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/08/2006
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
50
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
396
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
396
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
1905
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
1905
0
Mercy Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
1905
0
Query!
Country [1]
1905
0
New Zealand
Query!
Funding source category [2]
1906
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [2]
1906
0
Dunedin Public Hospital
Query!
Address [2]
1906
0
Query!
Country [2]
1906
0
New Zealand
Query!
Funding source category [3]
1907
0
University
Query!
Name [3]
1907
0
University of Otago
Query!
Address [3]
1907
0
Query!
Country [3]
1907
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Nigel Hartnett
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
1720
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
1720
0
Simon McMahon
Query!
Address [1]
1720
0
Query!
Country [1]
1720
0
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [2]
1721
0
Individual
Query!
Name [2]
1721
0
John Hyndman
Query!
Address [2]
1721
0
Query!
Country [2]
1721
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
3551
0
Mercy Hospital
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
3551
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
3551
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
3551
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
3551
0
07/08/2006
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
3551
0
LRS/06/04/016
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
3552
0
Dunedin Public Hospital
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
3552
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
3552
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
3552
0
Query!
Approval date [2]
3552
0
07/08/2006
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
3552
0
LRS/06/04/016
Query!
Ethics committee name [3]
3553
0
University of Otago
Query!
Ethics committee address [3]
3553
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [3]
3553
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [3]
3553
0
Query!
Approval date [3]
3553
0
07/08/2006
Query!
Ethics approval number [3]
3553
0
LRS/06/04/016
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Rotator cuff surgery ranks in the top 3 procedures performed according to Accident Compensation Commission records. Arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery is becoming more common as surgeons skills and techniques become better.However pain relief following an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can be problematic. A number of different techniques have been described to overcome this problem. The one conventionally used is an interscalene block whereby the nerves at the base of the neck receive a local anaesthetic injection. The patient is then given IV/oral analgesics once the block has worn off. The main issues are that 1. sometimes the block does not work (ie.. does not provide pain relief/control) and 2. sometimes the patients get concerned that the block fails to resolve (ie.. they are left with a short-term almost paralysis type picture) and makes movements and sensation of the affected arm difficult for the patient.There is no accepted consensus on which technique is best, however, recently devices have become available which infuse the anaesthetic directly into the shoulder joint. The results both locally and internationally although anecdotal (no scientific paper has compared the two techniques) are promising and may lead to better and more effective pain control as well as taking away the patients concern regarding there non-functioning arm.We will be undertaking the first project to compare the traditional technique against a direct local anaesthetic infusion pump. We feel that the potential health outcomes from this new technique for pain control, may change what is now considered standard treatment. It may even become practical for use in other areas of Arthroscopy such as the knee, ankle, elbow or wrist Our hypothesis is that there is an advantage in terms of post op pain relief with the use of a Breg Pain Pump with a short acting brachial plexus block compared to a long acting brachial plexus block. We will be doing this by using a visual analogue score for the patients to see whether there is any statistical significant difference between group 1 (those who will be receiving a short acting inter-scalene block and subacromial infusion pump) compared with group 2 (those who will receive a long-acting inter-scalene block)
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
27594
0
Query!
Address
27594
0
Query!
Country
27594
0
Query!
Phone
27594
0
Query!
Fax
27594
0
Query!
Email
27594
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
10556
0
Mr. Simon McMahon
Query!
Address
10556
0
Mercy Hospital
Private Bag 1919
Dunedin
Query!
Country
10556
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
10556
0
+64 3 4672315
Query!
Fax
10556
0
Query!
Email
10556
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
1484
0
Nigel Hartnett
Query!
Address
1484
0
Orthopaedic Registrar
Orthopaedic Department
Dunedin Public Hospital
Private Bag 1921
Dunedin
Query!
Country
1484
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
1484
0
+64 3 4740999
Query!
Fax
1484
0
Query!
Email
1484
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF