Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12607000073404
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
15/12/2006
Date registered
23/01/2007
Date last updated
16/11/2018
Date data sharing statement initially provided
16/11/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Caseload midwifery for women at low risk of medical complications: a randomised controlled trial
Query!
Scientific title
A randomised trial comparing One-to-One midwifery care with standard hospital maternity care for women at low risk, in order to decrease operative birth and other interventions and increase the duration of breastfeeding and women’s satisfaction with care, with no increase in costs of care
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
296626
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
COSMOS
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Maternity model of care
1565
0
Query!
Caesarean section
310449
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
1666
1666
0
0
Query!
Breast feeding
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The intervention is caseload midwifery. Women allocated to the intervention will receive antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care from a known midwife with one or two antenatal visits conducted by a ‘back-up’ midwife. The midwife will collaborate with obstetricians and other health professionals as necessary. If the woman has an extended labour, or if the primary midwife is unavailable, care will be provided by the back-up midwife. Each midwife will be allocated a group of women to care for in this way (a caseload). The intervention is from the pregnancy booking visit until 5 days after birth (approximately 6-7 months).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
1510
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
For women allocated to standard care can choose from any other care option at the particular trial site.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
2306
0
To determine whether caseload (one on one) midwifery care for women at low risk of medical complications decreases the proportion of women having a caesarean section birth, compared with women in ‘standard’ care models (19 compared with 14%).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
2306
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
2306
0
Measured at time of birth, obtained from medical record as soon as practical.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
4019
0
To test if women receiving caseload care have: decreased rates of instrumental vaginal births, obstetric analgesia, perineal trauma and induction of labour (measures from birth record).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
4019
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
4019
0
no update
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
4020
0
Decreased postnatal depression
Query!
Assessment method [2]
4020
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
4020
0
6 weeks and 6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
4021
0
Increased satisfaction with care
Query!
Assessment method [3]
4021
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
4021
0
6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
4022
0
A higher proportion of breastfeeding
Query!
Assessment method [4]
4022
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
4022
0
At 6 weeks and 6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
4023
0
Decreased smoking
Query!
Assessment method [5]
4023
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
4023
0
Obtained from pregnancy record and also at 6 weeks postpartum.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
4024
0
To test if the model is cost neutral and/or cost effective
Query!
Assessment method [6]
4024
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
4024
0
Measured at a variety of time points depending on what is measured as well as resource use data collected at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
4025
0
To test if midwives providing caseload care have decreased staff attrition and increased work satisfaction.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
4025
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
4025
0
Measured early in trial, approximatley one month after a midwife commences work in the model, and at completion of intervention or when a midwife leaves the model.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
4026
0
Other outcomes collected will include measures of perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
4026
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
4026
0
From pregnancy and birth record and at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Low-medical risk at recruitment;- English-speaking: able to speak, read and write in English;- Less than 24 completed weeks gestation at recruitment.- of childbearing age (on average 18-45 years, but women could be yournger or older than this providing all other eligibility criteria are met).
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
45
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
High medical risk including (1) obstetric history such as stillbirth or neonatal death; three or more consecutive miscarriages; previous fetal death in utero, previous preterm birth (<32 weeks); previous mid-trimester loss/cervical incompetence/cone biopsy/known uterine anomaly; previous early onset of pre-eclampsia (<32 weeks); or rhesus iso-immunisation. (2) Complications during current pregnancy such as multiple pregnancy; or fetal abnormality detected. (3) Medical conditions such as cardiac disease; essential hypertension; renal disease; pre-existing diabetes; previous gestational diabetes; epilepsy; severe asthma; substance use; significant psychiatric disorders; obesity (>35BMI) or significantly underweight.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation by phone/fax /computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Stratification for site and parity. Dynamic (adaptive) randomisation method
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/04/2007
Query!
Actual
11/04/2007
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
8/06/2010
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/06/2012
Query!
Sample size
Target
2008
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
2314
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
1811
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
1811
0
National Health and Medical Research Council project grant
Query!
Address [1]
1811
0
NHMRC
16 Marcus Clarke St
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
1811
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Government body
Query!
Name
National Health and Medical Research Council
Query!
Address
NHMRC
16 Marcus Clarke St
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
1633
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
1633
0
Nil
Query!
Address [1]
1633
0
Query!
Country [1]
1633
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
3396
0
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
3396
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
3396
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
3396
0
27/03/2007
Query!
Approval date [1]
3396
0
09/04/2007
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
3396
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
In Australia and internationally, there is concern about the growing proportion of women being delivered by caesarean section. There is evidence of increased risk of placenta accreta and percreta in subsequent pregnancies, and decreased fertility; and significant resource implications. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) of continuity of midwifery care have reported reduced caesareans, and other interventions in labour. They have also found increased satisfaction, with no statistically significant differences in perinatal morbidity or mortality. One Australian RCT comparing continuity of care (team midwifery) with standard care demonstrated a decrease in women having caesarean birth from 18% to 13%. RCTs conducted in the UK and in Australia have largely measured the effect of teams of care providers (commonly 6-12 midwives) with very few testing caseload care. We want to determine whether caseload (one on one) midwifery care decreases the proportion of women having a caesarean section birth, compared with women in ‘standard’ care models (for women at low risk of medical complications). We will also explore other outcomes such as rates of instrumental vaginal births, analgesia, perineal trauma and induction of labour; postnatal depression; satisfaction with care; the proportion breastfeeding at 6 weeks and 6 months; smoking; andthe cost of this model. A final area is about midwives: to explore how this model affects midwives.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Peer reviewed publications: McLachlan, H. L., et al. (2008) COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with one-to-one midwifery support: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 8, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-35. McLachlan, H., et al. (2008). "COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with One-to-one midwifery Support: a randomised controlled trial." BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 8. Forster, D. A., et al. (2011) Exploring implementation and sustainability of models of care: can theory help? BMC Public Health 11, 10 McLachlan, H. L., et al. (2012). "Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial." BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 119(12): 1483–1492. Davey, M.-A., et al. (2013). "Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial)." Midwifery 29(12): 1297–1302. Newton, M. S., et al. (2014) Comparing satisfaction and burnout between caseload and standard care midwives: Findings from two cross-sectional surveys conducted in Victoria, Australia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14, DOI: 10.1186/s12884-014-0426-7 Forster, D. A., et al. (2014) Individualised, flexible postnatal care: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research 14, DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0569-2 Dawson, K., et al. (2015). "Exploring midwifery students? views and experiences of caseload midwifery: A cross-sectional survey conducted in Victoria, Australia." Midwifery 31(2): e7-e15. Forster, D. A., et al. (2016) Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women’s satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 16, DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0798-y McLachlan, H. L., et al. (2016). "The effect of primary midwife-led care on women's experience of childbirth: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial." BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 123(3): 465-474.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
27444
0
Prof Helen McLachlan
Query!
Address
27444
0
La Trobe University
Bundoora, VIC, 3086
Query!
Country
27444
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
27444
0
001161394795955
Query!
Fax
27444
0
Query!
Email
27444
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
10699
0
Helen McLachlan
Query!
Address
10699
0
La Trobe University
Bundoora, VIC, 3086
Query!
Country
10699
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
10699
0
+61 3 83418500
Query!
Fax
10699
0
+61 3 83418555
Query!
Email
10699
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
1627
0
Helen McLachlan
Query!
Address
1627
0
Judith Lumley Centre
La Trobe University
Bundoora, VIC, 3086
Query!
Country
1627
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
1627
0
61 3 94795955
Query!
Fax
1627
0
+61 3 83418555
Query!
Email
1627
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF