Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12607000357459
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
29/06/2007
Date registered
4/07/2007
Date last updated
4/07/2007
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Effectiveness of Neuromuscle electrical stimulation in rehabilitation of knee osteoarthritis patients
Query!
Scientific title
A randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of exercises, electrical stimulation and education techniques on rehabilitation of knee osteoarthritis patients
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Knee osteoarthritis patients
1914
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
2005
2005
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Intervention 2 times a week for 8 weeks, 41 patients per group.
3 groups
interventions groups
Group 1: exercises (bike 10min, isometric quadriceps exercises, stretching)
Group 2: Electrical stimulation (bike 10min, isometric quadriceps exercises plus electrical stimulation, stretching)
Query!
Intervention code [1]
1860
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control Group
Group 3: Education with some devices of weight reduction, how to reduce the pain with ice or mild hot water, use of comfortable shoes and some informations about the desease.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
2829
0
Function
Query!
Assessment method [1]
2829
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
2829
0
Assessed pre and immediately post intervention
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
2830
0
Timed up and go test
Query!
Assessment method [2]
2830
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
2830
0
Assessed pre and immediately post intervention
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
2831
0
Pain
Query!
Assessment method [3]
2831
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
2831
0
Assessed pre and immediately post intervention
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
2832
0
Analogic visual scale
Query!
Assessment method [4]
2832
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
2832
0
Assessed pre and immediately post intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
4776
0
Activity of Daily Living Scale(ADL)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
4776
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
4776
0
Assessed pre and immediately post intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
4777
0
Western Ontario and
Query!
Assessment method [2]
4777
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
4777
0
Assessed pre and immediately post intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
4778
0
McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
4778
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
4778
0
Assessed pre and immediately post intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
4779
0
Short Form - 36
Query!
Assessment method [4]
4779
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
4779
0
Assessed pre and immediately post intervention
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Knee osteoarthritis (grade 2 ou more in Kelgreen Lawrence classification), knee pain,
Query!
Minimum age
50
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Knee arthroplastie, symptomatic hip osteoarthritis
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computerised sequence generation
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
the people assessing the outcomes (assessor) and the people analysing the results/data (data analyst) will be blinded
Query!
Phase
Phase 1
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/04/2007
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
123
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
2149
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
2149
0
Ambulatory of Specialities of Grajau
Query!
Address [1]
2149
0
Query!
Country [1]
2149
0
Brazil
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Aline Mizusaki Imoto
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
1950
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
1950
0
Virgínia Fernandes Moça Trevisani
Query!
Address [1]
1950
0
Query!
Country [1]
1950
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
3944
0
Federal University of São Paulo
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
3944
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
3944
0
Brazil
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
3944
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
3944
0
09/03/2007
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
3944
0
CEP 0141/07
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
purpose of the study: verify the effectivity of electrical stimulation and exercises in quadriceps exercise at knee function and pain. 1 - Hypothesis: the electrical stimulation plus exercises and only the exercises are better than educational program 2 - the group submmited to electrical stimulation is better than the group that did only exercises.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
27674
0
Query!
Address
27674
0
Query!
Country
27674
0
Query!
Phone
27674
0
Query!
Fax
27674
0
Query!
Email
27674
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
11049
0
Aline Mizusaki Imoto
Query!
Address
11049
0
Rua Pedro de Toledo 598
Query!
Country
11049
0
Brazil
Query!
Phone
11049
0
55-11-55752970
Query!
Fax
11049
0
Query!
Email
11049
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
1977
0
Maria Stella Peccin
Query!
Address
1977
0
Rua Pedro de Toledo 598
Query!
Country
1977
0
Brazil
Query!
Phone
1977
0
55-11-55752970
Query!
Fax
1977
0
Query!
Email
1977
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF