Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12607000395437
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
19/07/2007
Date registered
1/08/2007
Date last updated
1/08/2007
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Presentation of preventive health information: a comparison of paper versus computer
Query!
Scientific title
Population-based cancer screening: Distinguishing the influence of tailoring content and presentation via the web, compared to paper-based material, on knowledge of and attitudes to colorectal cancer screening
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Colorectal cancer screening
2186
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
2282
2282
0
0
Query!
Bowel - Back passage (rectum) or large bowel (colon)
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Baseline survey (measuring attitudes to screening and readiness to engage in screening) followed by endpoint survey approximately 2 weeks later for all intervention groups and control group. Separate interventions will occur immediately before administration of the endpoint survey: non-personalised paper-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening information; personalised paper-based CRC screening information; non-personalised web-based CRC screening information; personalised web-based CRC screening information; baseline and endpoint survey only (control). Those individuals who, in the endpoint survey, indicate they are ready to screen will be provided with a FOBT (faecal occult blood test) kit. Those that indicate that they are not ready to screen will be provided with a "request for kit" card to return within one year of the intervention.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
1895
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
3173
0
Change in screening decision stage.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
3173
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
3173
0
Measured at the endpoint survey.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
5290
0
For the intervention groups, intention to screen and tracking of decision making processes will be measured immediately following the intervention (ie as part of the intervention). Actual uptake of screening will be measured for intervention and control groups at 35 days from provision of the FOBT kit. Tracking of decision processes will not be an outcome for the control group.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
5290
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
5290
0
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Some familiarity with using a computer to search the Internet.
Query!
Minimum age
50
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
76
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Current regular CRC screening; diagnosis of colorectal cancer or polyps.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Participants will be a random sample within certain electoral areas, provided by the Australian Electoral Commission. Names will again be randomised and then divided into 5 groups by a researcher not working on the study
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Each of the 5 groups will be randomly assigned to one of four intervention groups or to control groups using computer-generated random number sequence. This will be performed by a researcher not involved with the study
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/07/2007
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
125
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
2448
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
2448
0
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Preventative Health Flagship (internal funding)
Query!
Address [1]
2448
0
Query!
Country [1]
2448
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Government body
Query!
Name
CSIRO Preventative Health Flagship
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
2220
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
2220
0
Adelaide Colorectal Cancer Collaborative
Query!
Address [1]
2220
0
Query!
Country [1]
2220
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
4302
0
CSIRO Human Nutrition
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
4302
0
Kintore Avenue Adelaide SA
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
4302
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
4302
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
4302
0
26/09/2007
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
4302
0
06/20
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary aim of the study is to investigate whether it is perceived personal relevance (through tailoring of messages to an individual's specific health beliefs concerning colorectal cancer screening), or ease of navigation (through web-based delivery) to access personally relevant material, or both factors, that has the greater effect on the decision to screen for colorectal cancer using a Faecal Occult Blood kit (FOBT). Our hypothesis is that individuals receiving tailored, web-based information are more likely to decide to screen. The study fits in with the broader aim of attempting to understand the factors that motivate people to participate in colorectal cancer screening, and can serve as a basis for providing consumer information and decision tools designed to increase participation in colorectal cancer screening technologies.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
27709
0
Query!
Address
27709
0
Query!
Country
27709
0
Query!
Phone
27709
0
Query!
Fax
27709
0
Query!
Email
27709
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
11084
0
Ms Ingrid Flight
Query!
Address
11084
0
CSIRO Human Nutrition
PO Box 10041
Kintore Avenue
Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country
11084
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
11084
0
(08) 8303 8881
Query!
Fax
11084
0
Query!
Email
11084
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
2012
0
Dr Carlene Wilson
Query!
Address
2012
0
CSIRO Human Nutrition
PO Box 10041
Kintore Avenue
Adelaide BC SA 5000
Query!
Country
2012
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
2012
0
(08) 8303 8906
Query!
Fax
2012
0
Query!
Email
2012
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF