Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12608000209392
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
9/04/2008
Date registered
18/04/2008
Date last updated
25/06/2010
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Acute myocardial infarction: investigating evidence-based practice to address the rural disadvantage.
Query!
Scientific title
The impact of clinical pathways on acute myocardial infarction management in rural hospitals.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
252103
0
Impact of clinical pathways on time to thrombolysis in rural hospitals.
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Acute myocardial infarction
3024
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
3174
3174
0
0
Query!
Coronary heart disease
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
A five step process over 3 months of implementing clinical pathways for AMI management in rural emergency departments.
The intervention sites will participate in the 5 step evidence-based implementation process described below. The control group will receive a hard copy of the relevant NHF guidelines. The evidence-based 5 step intervention within emergency departments to implement clinical pathways will be a combination of processes proposed by Doherty and Jones (2006) and Kinsman et al. (2007). In brief, the three month implementation process involves:
(b) Engaging clinicians
Group discussions will be held with medical and nursing staff regarding barriers and facilitators for clinical pathways whilst local clinicians will be recruited as Research Assistants. This role will involve activities such as participating in the clinical pathway development, as described below, and promoting the study amongst other staff members.
(c) Clinical pathway development
Hospital-specific clinical pathways will be developed collaboratively at each emergency department.
(d) Reminders
Reminder visits will occur twice following implementation to liaise with staff. Research Assistants will also be asked to remind medical and nursing staff about the clinical pathway.
(e) Education
Education sessions will be held during implementation to review evidence underpinning the clinical pathway. All staff will receive written material regarding thrombolytic drugs.
(f) Audit and feedback
Audit results reflecting compliance with the clinical pathway and thrombolysis administration will be communicated to staff twice during the implementation of the clinical pathway.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
2765
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Distribution of clinical guidelines without implementation of clinical pathways.
Query!
Control group
Historical
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
4060
0
Proportion of eligible patients receiving a thrombolytic drug.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
4060
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
4060
0
During treatment in the emergency department.
Door-to-needle time for thrombolysis.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
6832
0
Adherence to clinical pathway via the RE-AIM framework.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
6832
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
6832
0
During emergency department treatment.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
AMI patients meeting criteria for delivery of thrombolytic drugs.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
AMI not primary diagnosis.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Six hospitals involved - three will be randomised to intervention and three to control. Randomisation of hospitals to intervention or control will be the result of a coin toss conducted by the research team off-site and concealed from the study sites.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation by coin-tossing.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Cluster trial.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
2/06/2008
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
140
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
814
0
3550
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
815
0
3500
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
816
0
3630
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
817
0
3564
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
818
0
3350
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
3279
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
3279
0
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences
Query!
Address [1]
3279
0
Monash University
VIC 3800
Query!
Country [1]
3279
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences
Query!
Address
Monash University VIC 3800
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
2931
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
2931
0
Query!
Address [1]
2931
0
Query!
Country [1]
2931
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
5266
0
Monash University
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
5266
0
Monash University VIC 3800
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
5266
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
5266
0
14/03/2008
Query!
Approval date [1]
5266
0
02/04/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
5266
0
CF08/0532 - 2008000253
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Background People living in rural Australia are more likely to die in hospital following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI i.e. “heart attack”) than people in major cities (Moon & Phillips 2007). This disparity is partly due to lower uptake of National Heart Foundation (NHF) guidelines for the administration of thrombolytic drugs. One-third of eligible patients in rural areas do not receive this life-saving intervention (Kinsman et al. 2007). Clinical pathways are structured, locally developed multidisciplinary care plans for specific clinical problems that take into account local resources and availability of doctors. They are an important tool for linking evidence to practice and can enhance adherence to guidelines for use of thrombolytic drugs (Campbell et al.1998). Given that outcomes after AMI in rural settings are poor and that clinical pathways can improve outcomes this study trialled an evidence-based clinical pathway implementation process and its impact on AMI treatment in rural hospitals. Participants Six Victorian rural hospitals participated. Pairs of hospitals were matched according to the anticipated number of eligible patients and randomly allocated to either the intervention (n=3) or control (n=3) sites. Method The intervention sites participated in a 6 month implementation process. The 5 step evidence-based intervention involved: (1) Engaging clinicians, (2) Clinical pathway development, (3) Reminders, (4) Education, and (5) Audit and feedback. The control group received hard copies of the relevant NHF guidelines. Medical records of all patients diagnosed with AMI attending the 6 hospitals during the study period were identified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes. The records were then audited using a standardised data protocol (approximate total of 600 records across 6 sites). Data included type of AMI, gender, and age. The audit also checked whether criteria for use of a thrombolytic drug were met, and if so, whether one was administered and the time in minutes from presentation to administration. Results The implementation of the clinical pathway had no impact on process measures. Conclusion Interventions to narrow the evidence-practice gap for the management of chest pain in rural settings require further evaluation if the gap in outcomes between rural and urban settings is to be reduced.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
28511
0
Query!
Address
28511
0
Query!
Country
28511
0
Query!
Phone
28511
0
Query!
Fax
28511
0
Query!
Email
28511
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
11668
0
Leigh Kinsman
Query!
Address
11668
0
School of Rural Health
Monash University
PO Box 666
Bendigo VIC 3552
Query!
Country
11668
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
11668
0
61354409022
Query!
Fax
11668
0
61354409080
Query!
Email
11668
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
2596
0
Leigh Kinsman
Query!
Address
2596
0
Monash University
PO Box 666
Bendigo VIC 3552
Query!
Country
2596
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
2596
0
61354409022
Query!
Fax
2596
0
61354409080
Query!
Email
2596
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF