Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12608000249358
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
13/05/2008
Date registered
15/05/2008
Date last updated
13/04/2012
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A randomised controlled trial of outpatient cervical priming for induction of labour
Query!
Scientific title
A multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing outpatient and inpatient cervical priming with intravaginal prostaglandins for induction of labour
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
560
0
National Health and Medical Research Council ID: 519236
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
OPRA
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Outpatient management of the initiation of induction of labour in pregnant woman
3142
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
3301
3301
0
0
Query!
Childbirth and postnatal care
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Cervical priming with maternal and fetal monitoring prior to induction of labour in a hospital antenatal assessment area, followed by discharge home for no more than 24 hours of pregnant women - comparison with inpatient management of priming for induction of labour (usual care) of pregnant women.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
2879
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Outpatient management and monitoring compared to inpatient management and monitoring
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
4188
0
Syntocinon usage (review of labour records of timing, amount and duration)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
4188
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
4188
0
Subsequent labour and delivery
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
4189
0
Obstetric interventions (review of labour records of caesarean section rates, instrumental delivery rates, analgesia used etc.)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
4189
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
4189
0
Subsequent labour, delivery and postnatal course (up to 6 weeks post natal)
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
4190
0
Pregnancy complication
Query!
Assessment method [3]
4190
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
4190
0
Subsequent labour, delivery and post natal course (from medical records and interview/written survey at 6 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
7081
0
Economic evaluation (discrete choice experiment plus resource usage evaluation)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
7081
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
7081
0
Subsequent labour and delivery and post natal course (up to 6 weeks postnatal)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
7082
0
Maternal satisfaction / psychosocial outcomes (EPDS, other written survey methods, interviews)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
7082
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
7082
0
Subsequent labour and delivery and postnatal course (up to 6 weeks post natal)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
7083
0
Caregiver satisfaction / psychosocial outcomes (interviews plus written questionairre)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
7083
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
7083
0
Before and after initiation of intervention
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All women of reproductive age having priming for induction of labour, where induction is clinically indicated, there is no evidence of maternal or fetal compromise and in the opinion of the referring caregiver, outpatient management and monitoring is clinically appropriate
Query!
Minimum age
Not stated
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
Not stated
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Maternal or fetal compromise. or in the opinion of the referring clinician, inpatient management and monitoring is clinically indicated
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Referral from a clinician deciding that induction is necessary during the process of antenatal care. A research officer checks eligibility and initiates randomisation from an off site randomisation centre. Randomisation is not blinded by the nature of the intervention
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation blocks stratified to site of intervention and parity
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/07/2008
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
900
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
675
0
5006
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
676
0
5000
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
677
0
5042
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
3377
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
3377
0
National Health and Medical Research Council
Query!
Address [1]
3377
0
Canberra
Query!
Country [1]
3377
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr Chris Wilkinson
Query!
Address
Women's and Children's Hospital
72 King William Rd
North Adelaide
South Australia 5006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
3021
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
3021
0
Professor Deborah Turnbull
Query!
Address [1]
3021
0
School of Psychology
University of Adelaide
North Terrace
Adelaide 5000
Query!
Country [1]
3021
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
282
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
282
0
Professor Philip Ryan
Query!
Address [1]
282
0
Department of Public Health
University of Adelaide
North Terrace
Adelaide 5000
Query!
Country [1]
282
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
283
0
Individual
Query!
Name [2]
283
0
Assoc Professor Robert Bryce
Query!
Address [2]
283
0
Clinical Director of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Centre for Perinatal Medicine
Flinders Medical Centre
Bedford Park 5042
South Australia
Query!
Country [2]
283
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [3]
284
0
Individual
Query!
Name [3]
284
0
Dr Karen Gerard
Query!
Address [3]
284
0
Reader in Health Economics
University of Southampton
Query!
Country [3]
284
0
United Kingdom
Query!
Other collaborator category [4]
285
0
Individual
Query!
Name [4]
285
0
Dr Georgina Stamp
Query!
Address [4]
285
0
Research Fellow
University of South Australia
Query!
Country [4]
285
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
5403
0
CYWHS Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
5403
0
Research Secretariat 72 King William Rd Noth Adelaide South Australia 5006
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
5403
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
5403
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
5403
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
5403
0
REC2034/2/11
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Hospital versus home based induction of labour This study aims to find out whether or not it is good practice to permit pregnant women to go home to rest after they have had induction of labour started. The study is important because it will identify potential advantages and disadvantages to this approach, so that women can make properly informed choices about their care.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Outpatient cervical priming for induction of labour: a mixed methods investigation to establish the need for and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial - Presentation at PSANZ08 Congress April 2008 Gold Coast Convention & Exhibition Centre, Queensland
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
28584
0
Query!
Address
28584
0
Query!
Country
28584
0
Query!
Phone
28584
0
Query!
Fax
28584
0
Query!
Email
28584
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
11741
0
Ms Pamela Adelson
Query!
Address
11741
0
School of Psychology
University of Adelaide
North Terrace
Adelaide 5000
Query!
Country
11741
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
11741
0
0401193809
Query!
Fax
11741
0
Query!
Email
11741
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
2669
0
Dr Chris Wilkinson
Query!
Address
2669
0
Department of Perinatal Medicine
Women's and Children's Hospital
72 King William Rd
North Adelaide 5006
South Australia
Query!
Country
2669
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
2669
0
0412 883336
Query!
Fax
2669
0
8161 7654
Query!
Email
2669
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF