Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12608000590369
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
14/08/2008
Date registered
21/11/2008
Date last updated
21/01/2014
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A comparison of continuous and one-off interscalene block for pain relief following minor shoulder surgery.
Query!
Scientific title
A comparison of continuous and one-off interscalene block for postoperative analgesia following minor shoulder surgery.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
259928
0
Nil Known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Patients requiring postoperative analgesia following minor shoulder surgery (subacromial decompression and stabilisation)
3509
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
3663
3663
0
0
Query!
Other anaesthesiology
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Interscalene block
A single operator Dr Michael Fredrickson (MF) will place all interscalene catheters (ISCs) in the operating room. Patients will be premedicated with oral acetaminophen 1 g, diclofenac SR 75 mg and omeprazole 20 mg one hour before surgery. Intravenous midazolam 2 mg, alfentanil 0.5 mg and cephazolin 1 g will be administered 5 min prior to interscalene catheter placement. Catheters will be placed following either the administration of a superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) or after the induction of general anaesthesia depending on patient preference. ISCs will be placed using a combination of ultrasound and nerve stimulation.
General anaesthesia will then be administered and ropivacaine 0.5% 0.5 mL/kg to a maximum of 30 mL will be administered through the ISC.
Continuous block patients will then receive an ambulatory infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at the end of surgery.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
3228
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Single shot patients will receive no infusion at the end of surgery.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
4567
0
Reduced pain after minor shoulder surgery, assessed by patient interrogation regarding oral analgesic consumption and pain scores using numerical rating pain score (NRPS).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
4567
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
4567
0
1-2 days post operatively.
Numerical rating pain score (NRPS) measured by Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) nurse on arrival in the PACU.
Oral analgesic requirements and pain scores (0-10) measured in the afternoon of Day 1 and Day 2 following surgery
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
5001
0
Arm numbness/weakness measured by patient numerical rating scale (0-10) on postoperative day 2 questionnaire.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
5001
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
5001
0
First 48 hours
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
7720
0
Chronic pain post shoulder surgery, assessed by written questionnaire (The DASH form, Institute for Work & Health 2006) completed by patient at 3 months post operatively.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
7720
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
7720
0
Day 90 post operatively
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients undergoing elective minor shoulder surgery under the anaesthetic care of the principal investigator.
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Patient refusal / inability to consent, age no limits
2. Allergy amide local anaesthetic (LA) drugs
3. Existing neurological disorders / neuropathy of the operative extremity
4. Infection at site of needle puncture
5. Severe respiratory disease
6. Chronic opioid therapy
7. Patients intolerant of all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
A invitation to participate in the study will be posted to patients identified from the operating list. One preoperative phone call will be made by the research assistant to assess patient’s suitability for the study. At this stage participation in this study would be discussed with the patient. Post operatively, patients will be questioned by phone for some simple data for the first 2 days following surgery. All patients will have a follow-up phone call at 10 days (5-10 mins) and they will be asked to fill out another questionnaire at 3 months.
Patients will be assigned to one of the two groups by random number generator, and assignments delivered in a sealed opaque envelope.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
A computerised random number generator will be used to assign the patient to one of the 2 groups.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
9/07/2008
Query!
Actual
9/07/2008
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
29/04/2009
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
60
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
1099
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
1099
0
Auckland
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
3682
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
3682
0
Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC)
Query!
Address [1]
3682
0
P O Box 242
Wellington 6140
Query!
Country [1]
3682
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr Michael Fredrickson
Query!
Address
Anaesthesia Institute
P O Box 109 199
Newmarket
Auckland 1149
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
3306
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
3306
0
Query!
Address [1]
3306
0
Query!
Country [1]
3306
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
5735
0
Northern X Regional Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
5735
0
Private Bag 92 522 Wellesley Street Auckland 1141
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
5735
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
5735
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
5735
0
16/06/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
5735
0
NTX/08/04/027
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Acute postoperative pain is commonly severe after major shoulder surgery - with opioids being required for several days. There is increasing evidence that poorly treated acute postoperative pain is a predictor of chronic pain and therefore chronic disability. Further, evidence exists that preventing early postoperative pain reduces the risk of chronic pain. Continuous interscalene block (CISB) has been shown to provide better analgesia and patient satisfaction than opioids for rotator cuff surgery. It has also been shown to improve patient outcome. CISB has been successfully used in Auckland for 4 years, however, anaesthetists have had to base many aspects of the technique on personal opinion rather than evidence from high quality research. Although CISB has been shown to provide better analgesia and patient satisfaction than opioids for rotator cuff repair, it is unknown whether these benefits apply to less painful procedures such as arthroscopic stabilization and arthroscopic subacromial decompression. For both procedures, randomized trials comparing CISB with traditional opioid analgesia have not been conducted. The purpose of the current study is to determine whether CISB provides better analgesia and patient satisfaction than traditional single shot interscalene block (the community standard) following minor shoulder procedures (subacromial decompression and stabilisation). If the primary hypothesis is confirmed, this study will provide evidence supporting the use of continuous interscalene block for this surgery. This may result in future patients experiencing less postoperative pain after minor shoulder surgery. Potential benefits might include a lower incidence of post shoulder surgery chronic pain.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
N/A
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
28809
0
Dr Michael Fredrickson
Query!
Address
28809
0
Anaesthesia Institute
P.O. Box 109 199
Newmarket
Auckland 1149
Query!
Country
28809
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
28809
0
+64 9 522 1117
Query!
Fax
28809
0
Query!
Email
28809
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
11966
0
Michael Fredrickson
Query!
Address
11966
0
Anaesthesia Institute
P O Box 109 199
Newmarket
Auckland 1149
Query!
Country
11966
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
11966
0
+64 9 522 1117
Query!
Fax
11966
0
+64 9 522 1127
Query!
Email
11966
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
2894
0
Michael Fredrickson
Query!
Address
2894
0
Anaesthesia Institute
P O Box 109 199
Newmarket
Auckland 1149
Query!
Country
2894
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
2894
0
+64 9 522 1117
Query!
Fax
2894
0
+64 9 522 1127
Query!
Email
2894
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF