Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12609000072213
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
10/12/2008
Date registered
28/01/2009
Date last updated
28/01/2009
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparison of 0.5mg/kg and 1.0mg/kg Suxamethonium in patients undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison of 0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg Suxamethonium in patients undergoing voluntary ECT(Electroconvulsive Therapy)
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
the incidence and severity of postprocedure myalgia after ECT comparing two different doses of muscle relaxant
4114
0
Query!
patient undergoing voluntary ECT.
4115
0
Query!
compare the amount of post therapy myalgia between the two dosage groups
4116
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
4309
4309
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
comparison two doses of suxamethonium in ECT. suxamethonium is a muscle relaxant administered intravenously at the time of ECT to reduce muscle spasms. It will be administered in this way on two consecutive occasions within a week of each other at the time of ECT. On one occassion, the dosage amount of Suxamethonium administered to participants will be 1.0mg/kg
Query!
Intervention code [1]
3825
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
0.5mg/kg suxamethonium, will be adminsitered intravenously at the time of ECT to act as a muscle relaxant to reduce the amount of muscle spasms. Each dosage amount, 1.0mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg, of Suxamethonium will be administered on only one occassion each
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
5199
0
post procedure myalgia will be assessed by postprocedure questionaire completed by the patient at one hour post procedure
Query!
Assessment method [1]
5199
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
5199
0
at one hour from procedure and at 24hrs via a phone call for the 24hr assessment
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
5200
0
degree of fit modification: this is assessed by an observor who will classify how well the fit was modified. A well modified fit with minimal observed spasm is desirable and a less well modified fit with more muscle spasm is undesirable
Query!
Assessment method [2]
5200
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
5200
0
this assessment will take place at the time of the fit and the classification will take place immediately.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
5344
0
the status of myalgia in patients after the procedure. This will be achieved by asking the patient to nominate the degree of myalgia on a four point scale.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
5344
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
5344
0
one hour post procedure and at 24hr post procedure.
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
5345
0
the status of myalgia in patients after the procedure. This will be achieved by asking the patient to nominate the degree of myalgia on a four point scale.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
5345
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
5345
0
one hour post procedure and at 24hr post procedure.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
8753
0
quality of electroencephalogram (EEG) recording. The fit is monitored on the EEG, brain activity, and this is used to assess the adequacy of the fit. A poorly modified fit with significant muscle activity should result in artefact and poor quality recording whereas a well modified fit should result in a higher quality recording with less interference. This will be assessed off line by a blinded psychiatrist who will grade th equality of the recording on a four point scale. recordings will be presented to the assessor in a randomised fashion.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
8753
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
8753
0
this will occur at the completion of the study period and will be blinded.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
voluntary patients already booked independently for ECT
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
involuntary patient or patients deemed
unable to give consent
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
informed consent obtained and patient allocated randomly to receive either dose of suxamethonium then at next treatment with no other alterations they will have the other study dose that they did not receive on the previous ECT. The person enrolling the patient is unaware of which group they will be allocated to. Allocation is by way of 50 sequential numbers with random generation from a computer. . Thereafter this information is contained in sequentially numbered envelopes and the drug will be made up and given to the treating anaesthetist to administer by a second anaesthetist who is not involved in treating the patient
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
list of 50 numbers sequenced randomly by computer. Patients will be allocated to groups based on this
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/02/2009
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
50
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
4275
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
4275
0
Query!
Address [1]
4275
0
Query!
Country [1]
4275
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Peninsula Health
Query!
Address
Hastings Rd. Frankston, Victoria 3199
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
3848
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
3848
0
Query!
Address [1]
3848
0
Query!
Country [1]
3848
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
6329
0
Human Research and Ethics Committee Peninsula Health
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
6329
0
Hastings Rd Frankston, Victoria 3199
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
6329
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
6329
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
6329
0
03/12/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
6329
0
2008-50
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Patients undergoing ECT often experience postprocedure myalgia. There is also a published range of muscle relaxant doses to minimise this occurrence. It is the purpose of this study to compare the higher and lower recommended doses to see if there is a difference in postprocedure myalgia between the two doses.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
35030
0
Query!
Address
35030
0
Query!
Country
35030
0
Query!
Phone
35030
0
Query!
Fax
35030
0
Query!
Email
35030
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
12377
0
A/Prof T Loughnan
Query!
Address
12377
0
Department of Anaesthesia
Frankston Hospital
Hastings Rd
Frankston, Victoria 3199
Query!
Country
12377
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
12377
0
+61 3 97847445
Query!
Fax
12377
0
+613 97847441
Query!
Email
12377
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
3305
0
A/Prof T Loughnan
Query!
Address
3305
0
Department of Anaesthesia
Frankston Hospital
Hastings Rd
Frankston, Victoria 3199
Query!
Country
3305
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
3305
0
+613 97847445
Query!
Fax
3305
0
+613 97847441
Query!
Email
3305
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF