Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12609000196246
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
11/02/2009
Date registered
20/04/2009
Date last updated
5/07/2012
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Building on success: the sustainability and national feasibility of a community pharmacy intervention to improve the management of asthma
Query!
Scientific title
Building on success: the sustainability and national feasibility of a community pharmacy intervention to improve the management of asthma
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Asthma
4304
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Respiratory
4538
4538
0
0
Query!
Asthma
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
A previous intervention study (not registered on a trials registry) saw patients with potentially suboptimal management of their asthma identified from their dispensed medication history – in particular, a high rate of provision of reliever compared with preventer medication for asthma. These patients were sent educational material from their community pharmacists and advised to seek a review of their asthma management from their general practitioner. The intervention resulted in a three-fold improvement in the management of asthma, measured by a significant shift towards more patients using preventer medications and relying less heavily on their reliever medications. There were also significant improvements in self-reported asthma control and asthma-related quality of life.
This project is examining the long-term sustainability of the previously funded asthma intervention program by performing a 12-month follow-up and data analysis. If the effects of this low-cost, high-value intervention are sustained, it is envisaged that it will significantly impact on health policy in asthma management. If the effects are not sustained, further analysis of the data will be undertaken to determine frequency of the intervention required to gain sustained improvements. In addition, patients, community pharmacists and general practitioners will be invited to participate in qualitative face-to-face interviews to determine the perceived feasibility of the community pharmacy intervention on a national scale. Identification of key barriers and enables to the implementation of the intervention will lead to an improved process if necessary, with a higher level of satisfaction among the target population.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
4035
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
N/A
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
5416
0
Feasiblity - Qualitative analysis of patients, community pharmacists and general practitioners to identify common themes regarding the barriers and enables of a national intervention program. Interviews will be conducted face-to-face, on a one-to-one basis, and will be semi-structured.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
5416
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
5416
0
The interviews will take place in March 2009.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
5417
0
Sustainability - Quantitative analysis of the patients' asthma medcations, in particular, the ratio of dispensed inhaled corticosteroids to dispensed short-acting beta-2-agonists. The data will be collected by retrospective interrogation of pharmacy dispensing data, in all previously participating pharmacies. All data was de-identified originally, but uniquely coded to enable paired data analysis in the future.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
5417
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
5417
0
The quantitive data will be collected in November 2008.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
9109
0
N/A
Query!
Assessment method [1]
9109
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
9109
0
N/A
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Participants (patients with asthma, community pharmacusts and general practitioners) must have been involved in the previous intervention study.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Participants who are deceased, patients who do not have a curent diagnosis of asthma, community pharmacists and GPs who no longer practice at least half-time.
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Screening
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Both
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/10/2008
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
4482
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
4482
0
Asthma Foundations Australia
Query!
Address [1]
4482
0
491-495 King Street
West Melbourne
Victoria 3003
Query!
Country [1]
4482
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Unit for Medication Outcomes Research and Education, School of Pharmacy, University of Tasmania
Query!
Address
University of Tasmania Churchill Avenue Sandy Bay Private Bag 26 Hobart TAS 7001
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
4042
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
4042
0
Research Services, University of Tasmania
Query!
Address [1]
4042
0
University of Tasmania Churchill Avenue Sandy Bay Private Bag 1 Hobart TAS 7001
Query!
Country [1]
4042
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
6543
0
Tasmania Social Sciences Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
6543
0
Office of Research Services University of Tasmania Private Bag 1 Hobart Tasmania 7001
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
6543
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
6543
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
6543
0
03/12/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
6543
0
H10378
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
6544
0
Tasmania Health and Medical Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
6544
0
Office of Research Services University of Tasmania Private Bag 1 Hobart Tasmania 7001
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
6544
0
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
6544
0
Query!
Approval date [2]
6544
0
03/03/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
6544
0
H9039
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
A previous intervention project saw patients with potentially suboptimal management of their asthma identified from their dispensed medication history – in particular, a high rate of provision of reliever compared with preventer medication for asthma. These patients were sent educational material from their community pharmacists and advised to seek a review of their asthma management from their general practitioner. The intervention resulted in a three-fold improvement in the management of asthma, measured by a significant shift towards more patients using preventer medications and relying less heavily on their reliever medications.1 There were also significant improvements in self-reported asthma control and asthma-related quality of life. This project is examining the long-term sustainability of the previously funded asthma intervention program by performing a 12-month follow-up and data analysis. If the effects of this low-cost, high-value intervention are sustained, it is envisaged that it will significantly impact on health policy in asthma management. If the effects are not sustained, further analysis of the data will be undertaken to determine frequency of the intervention required to gain sustained improvements. In addition, patients, community pharmacists and general practitioners will be invited to participate in qualitative face-to-face interviews to determine the perceived feasibility of the community pharmacy intervention on a national scale. Identification of key barriers and enables to the implementation of the intervention will lead to an improved process if necessary, with a higher level of satisfaction among the target population.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
29270
0
Query!
Address
29270
0
Query!
Country
29270
0
Query!
Phone
29270
0
Query!
Fax
29270
0
Query!
Email
29270
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
12517
0
Bonnie Bereznicki
Query!
Address
12517
0
Unit for Medication Outcomes Research and Education
School of Pharmacy, University of Tasmania
Churchill Avenue Sandy Bay
Private Bag 26
Hobart TAS 7001
Query!
Country
12517
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
12517
0
+61 3 62262191
Query!
Fax
12517
0
+61 3 62267627
Query!
Email
12517
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
3445
0
Bonnie Bereznicki
Query!
Address
3445
0
Unit for Medication Outcomes Research and Education
School of Pharmacy, University of Tasmania
Churchill Avenue Sandy Bay
Private Bag 26
Hobart TAS 7001
Query!
Country
3445
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
3445
0
+61 3 62262191
Query!
Fax
3445
0
+61 3 62267627
Query!
Email
3445
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF